Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Democratic Republic of the Congo, 748 km apart

Lubumbashi vs Mbuji-Mayi Air quality index (AQI) today

Mbuji-Mayi has cleaner air than Lubumbashi right now: AQI 32 (Good) against 63 (Moderate).

That puts them in different EPA bands, so the health advice differs today. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Mbuji-Mayi averaged AQI 52 against 66, and it was the cleaner of the two on 6 of those days. Lubumbashi has lost more forest since 2001. Mbuji-Mayi has more tree cover.

Lubumbashi

Democratic Republic of the Congo

AQI 63

Moderate

PM2.5
16.7 µg/m³1.1× WHO guideline
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 11, 07:00 local
Mbuji-Mayi

Democratic Republic of the Congo

AQI 32

Good

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
5.3 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 11, 07:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Lubumbashi vs Mbuji-Mayi at a glance

Mbuji-Mayi is ahead on 6 of 6 measures, and Lubumbashi on 0. The better figure in each row is marked.

Lubumbashi and Mbuji-Mayi compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
LubumbashiMbuji-Mayi
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.6332 (better)
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.16.75.3 (better)
Past week's averageUS AQI, 7 days.6652 (better)
Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center.124 ha25 ha (better)
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.12.0%26.8% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.56.5K10.1K (better)

Air quality today

What is the air like in Lubumbashi and Mbuji-Mayi right now?

Mbuji-Mayi has cleaner air than Lubumbashi right now: AQI 32 (Good) against 63 (Moderate). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Lubumbashi's PM2.5 is about 1.1× the WHO's 24-hour guideline of 15 µg/m³.

Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either.

LubumbashiMbuji-Mayi

16.7PM2.5, µg/m³5.3
18.5PM10, µg/m³5.6
2.2Nitrogen dioxide, µg/m³1.4
63Ozone, µg/m³40

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Lubumbashi: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

Mbuji-Mayi: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 7 days?

Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Mbuji-Mayi averaged AQI 52 against 66, and it was the cleaner of the two on 6 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Lubumbashi1Mbuji-Mayi6
Average AQI
Lubumbashi66Mbuji-Mayi52
Worst day, AQI
Lubumbashi91Mbuji-Mayi63
LubumbashiMbuji-Mayi
50Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10Nov 11
The daily numbers (7 days)
Daily air quality index for Lubumbashi and Mbuji-Mayi
DayLubumbashiMbuji-Mayi
Nov 57863
Nov 69132
Nov 76361
Nov 83948
Nov 96560
Nov 106655
Nov 116345

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Lubumbashi and Mbuji-Mayi today?

Lubumbashi (AQI 63, Moderate): Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.

Mbuji-Mayi (AQI 32, Good): Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.

Exercise outdoors

Lubumbashi
Fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier.
Mbuji-Mayi
A good day to be active outside.

Windows

Lubumbashi
Fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution.
Mbuji-Mayi
Open them to air the house.

Masks

Lubumbashi
Not needed for most people.
Mbuji-Mayi
Not needed.

Air purifier

Lubumbashi
Worth running if you are sensitive.
Mbuji-Mayi
Not needed.

Against everywhere else

How do Lubumbashi and Mbuji-Mayi compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Lubumbashi's air is cleaner than 45% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Mbuji-Mayi's is cleaner than 78%. Within Democratic Republic of the Congo, that is 22% and 92% of its 38 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Lubumbashi
Beats 45%
Mbuji-Mayi
Beats 78%

More tree cover than…

Lubumbashi
Beats 26%
Mbuji-Mayi
Beats 62%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which has lost more forest, Lubumbashi or Mbuji-Mayi?

Lubumbashi has lost more: about 124 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 25 ha around Mbuji-Mayi. 124 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Lubumbashi
20012025

Worst year: 2014, with 21 ha lost.

Mbuji-Mayi
20012025

Worst year: 2004, with 6 ha lost.

Forest loss around Lubumbashi and Mbuji-Mayi, 2001 to 2025
LubumbashiMbuji-Mayi
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.124 ha25 ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.26%15% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.124 ha25 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Too little to callToo little to call
Main known causeTowns and roads (93%)Farms, pasture and plantations (74%)

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Lubumbashi

Satellite image of the area around Lubumbashi, August 2017

2017: satellite photo from August 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Mbuji-Mayi

Satellite image of the area around Mbuji-Mayi, July 2017

2017: satellite photo from July 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Lubumbashi or Mbuji-Mayi?

Mbuji-Mayi has more tree cover: 26.8% of the land within 2 km of its center against 12.0% around Lubumbashi, or about 84,195 trees against 37,699.

Lubumbashi12.0% of a 30% target
Mbuji-Mayi26.8% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Lubumbashi and Mbuji-Mayi
LubumbashiMbuji-Mayi
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.37.7K84.2K (better)
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.56.5K10.1K (better)
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.829K kg1.9M kg (better)

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Lubumbashi12.0% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 18, 2026
Mbuji-Mayi26.8% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 9, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Lubumbashi vs Mbuji-Mayi: your questions answered

Is Mbuji-Mayi cleaner than Lubumbashi?

On air quality, yes, right now: Mbuji-Mayi reads AQI 32 against 63, a gap of 31 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Mbuji-Mayi averaged AQI 52 against 66, and it was the cleaner of the two on 6 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Lubumbashi and Mbuji-Mayi today?

In Lubumbashi, at AQI 63: Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. In Mbuji-Mayi, at AQI 32: Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.

Which has lost more forest, Lubumbashi or Mbuji-Mayi?

Lubumbashi has lost more: about 124 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 25 ha around Mbuji-Mayi. 124 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Which has more trees, Lubumbashi or Mbuji-Mayi?

Mbuji-Mayi has more tree cover: 26.8% of the land within 2 km of its center against 12.0% around Lubumbashi, or about 84,195 trees against 37,699. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Lubumbashi and Mbuji-Mayi need?

Lubumbashi needs about 56,549 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Mbuji-Mayi about 10,053 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Lubumbashi and Mbuji-Mayi measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Lubumbashi vs Mbuji-Mayi comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 9, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Lubumbashi with somewhere else

This place

Lubumbashi