Air quality comparison · Democratic Republic of the Congo, 849 km apart
Kananga vs Lubumbashi Air quality index (AQI) today
Kananga has cleaner air than Lubumbashi right now: AQI 51 (Moderate) against 63 (Moderate).
Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Kananga averaged AQI 46 against 67, and it was the cleaner of the two on 5 of those days. Kananga has lost more forest since 2001. Kananga has more tree cover.
Democratic Republic of the Congo
AQI 51
Moderate
Cleaner right now
- PM2.5
- 9.4 µg/m³
- Main pollutant
- PM2.5
- Source
- Model estimate
- Reading
- Nov 10, 18:00 local
Democratic Republic of the Congo
AQI 63
Moderate
Cleaner right now
- PM2.5
- 16.7 µg/m³1.1× WHO guideline
- Main pollutant
- PM2.5
- Source
- Model estimate
- Reading
- Nov 11, 07:00 local
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Kananga51Lubumbashi63
Head to head
Kananga vs Lubumbashi at a glance
Kananga is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Lubumbashi on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Kananga | Lubumbashi | |
|---|---|---|
| Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better. | 51 (better) | 63 |
| PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³. | 9.4 (better) | 16.7 |
| Past week's averageUS AQI, 6 days. | 46 (better) | 67 |
| Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center. | 3,520 ha | 124 ha (better) |
| Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center. | 39.0% (better) | 12.0% |
| Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy. | 0 (better) | 56.5K |
Air quality today
What is the air like in Kananga and Lubumbashi right now?
Kananga has cleaner air than Lubumbashi right now: AQI 51 (Moderate) against 63 (Moderate). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.
Lubumbashi's PM2.5 is about 1.1× the WHO's 24-hour guideline of 15 µg/m³.
Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either.
KanangaLubumbashi
Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).
Kananga: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.
Lubumbashi: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.
The past week
Which had cleaner air over the past 6 days?
Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Kananga averaged AQI 46 against 67, and it was the cleaner of the two on 5 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.
- Cleaner days
- Kananga5Lubumbashi1
- Average AQI
- Kananga46Lubumbashi67
- Worst day, AQI
- Kananga54Lubumbashi91
The daily numbers (6 days)
| Day | Kananga | Lubumbashi |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | 40 | 78 |
| Nov 6 | 33 | 91 |
| Nov 7 | 54 | 63 |
| Nov 8 | 47 | 39 |
| Nov 9 | 50 | 65 |
| Nov 10 | 54 | 66 |
Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.
What it means today
Is it safe to go outside in Kananga and Lubumbashi today?
Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. Both are in the same EPA band today (Moderate), so the advice is the same.
Exercise outdoors
Fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier.
Windows
Fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution.
Masks
Not needed for most people.
Air purifier
Worth running if you are sensitive.
Against everywhere else
How do Kananga and Lubumbashi compare with the rest of the world?
Right now Kananga's air is cleaner than 61% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Lubumbashi's is cleaner than 45%. Within Democratic Republic of the Congo, that is 57% and 22% of its 38 measured places.
Cleaner air than…
- Kananga
- Beats 61%
- Lubumbashi
- Beats 45%
More tree cover than…
- Kananga
- Beats 82%
- Lubumbashi
- Beats 26%
Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which has lost more forest, Kananga or Lubumbashi?
Kananga has lost more: about 3,520 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 124 ha around Lubumbashi. 902 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.
Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.
Worst year: 2010, with 351 ha lost.
Worst year: 2014, with 21 ha lost.
| Kananga | Lubumbashi | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 3,520 ha | 124 ha (better) |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 27% | 26% (better) |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 902 ha | 124 ha (better) |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Holding steady | Too little to call |
| Main known cause | Shifting farming (74%) | Towns and roads (93%) |
Satellite timelapses
Watch both change, year by year
A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.
Kananga
2017: satellite photo from July 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 7 km north of the city center.
Lubumbashi
2017: satellite photo from August 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.
Trees
Which has more trees, Kananga or Lubumbashi?
Kananga has more tree cover: 39.0% of the land within 2 km of its center against 12.0% around Lubumbashi, or about 122,522 trees against 37,699.
The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.
| Kananga | Lubumbashi | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area. | 123K (better) | 37.7K |
| Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better. | 0 (better) | 56.5K |
| CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing. | 2.7M kg (better) | 829K kg |
Tree cover on the satellite image
The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.
Reading these numbers
How this comparison is made
Air quality index
The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.
Trees and forest
Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
More on the method on the About Airleaf page.
Frequently asked
Kananga vs Lubumbashi: your questions answered
Is Kananga cleaner than Lubumbashi?
On air quality, yes, right now: Kananga reads AQI 51 against 63, a gap of 12 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Kananga averaged AQI 46 against 67, and it was the cleaner of the two on 5 of those days.
Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Kananga and Lubumbashi today?
The advice is the same for both today. Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. Kananga reads AQI 51 and Lubumbashi reads AQI 63.
Which has lost more forest, Kananga or Lubumbashi?
Kananga has lost more: about 3,520 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 124 ha around Lubumbashi. 902 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.
Which has more trees, Kananga or Lubumbashi?
Kananga has more tree cover: 39.0% of the land within 2 km of its center against 12.0% around Lubumbashi, or about 122,522 trees against 37,699. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.
How many more trees do Kananga and Lubumbashi need?
Kananga needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Lubumbashi about 56,549 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.
Are Kananga and Lubumbashi measured the same way?
The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.
How often does the Kananga vs Lubumbashi comparison update?
The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 19, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.
Keep going
Compare them with somewhere else
Build your own
Compare Kananga with somewhere else
This place
Kananga