Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Democratic Republic of the Congo, 938 km apart

Kinshasa vs Mbuji-Mayi Air quality index (AQI) today

Mbuji-Mayi has cleaner air than Kinshasa right now: AQI 32 (Good) against 121 (Unhealthy for sensitive groups).

That puts them in different EPA bands, so the health advice differs today. Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Mbuji-Mayi averaged AQI 53 against 58, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. Kinshasa has lost more forest since 2001. Mbuji-Mayi has more tree cover.

Kinshasa

Democratic Republic of the Congo

AQI 121

Unhealthy for sensitive groups

PM2.5
43.8 µg/m³2.9× WHO guideline
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Ground station
Reading
Nov 11, 19:00 local
Mbuji-Mayi

Democratic Republic of the Congo

AQI 32

Good

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
5.3 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 11, 07:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Kinshasa vs Mbuji-Mayi at a glance

Mbuji-Mayi is ahead on 6 of 6 measures, and Kinshasa on 0. The better figure in each row is marked.

Kinshasa and Mbuji-Mayi compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
KinshasaMbuji-Mayi
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.12132 (better)
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.43.85.3 (better)
Past week's averageUS AQI, 6 days.5853 (better)
Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center.100 ha25 ha (better)
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.1.0%26.8% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.106K10.1K (better)

Air quality today

What is the air like in Kinshasa and Mbuji-Mayi right now?

Mbuji-Mayi has cleaner air than Kinshasa right now: AQI 32 (Good) against 121 (Unhealthy for sensitive groups). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Kinshasa's PM2.5 is about 2.9× the WHO's 24-hour guideline of 15 µg/m³.

Kinshasa is read from a nearby ground station and Mbuji-Mayi is a model estimate, so the two are not quite like for like.

KinshasaMbuji-Mayi

43.8PM2.5, µg/m³5.3

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Kinshasa: Ground station · WASARU / KINAQ Huilleries, 2.1 km away · median of 3 stations. Data: OpenAQ · AirGradient, KINAQ Huilleries.

Mbuji-Mayi: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 6 days?

Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Mbuji-Mayi averaged AQI 53 against 58, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Kinshasa2Mbuji-Mayi4
Average AQI
Kinshasa58Mbuji-Mayi53
Worst day, AQI
Kinshasa70Mbuji-Mayi63
KinshasaMbuji-Mayi
50Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10
The daily numbers (6 days)
Daily air quality index for Kinshasa and Mbuji-Mayi
DayKinshasaMbuji-Mayi
Nov 55863
Nov 64832
Nov 74761
Nov 86048
Nov 96460
Nov 107055

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Kinshasa and Mbuji-Mayi today?

Kinshasa (AQI 121, Unhealthy for sensitive groups): Sensitive groups should limit long or intense outdoor activity.

Mbuji-Mayi (AQI 32, Good): Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.

Exercise outdoors

Kinshasa
Children, older adults and people with asthma or heart disease should cut down long or hard exercise.
Mbuji-Mayi
A good day to be active outside.

Windows

Kinshasa
Close them to keep the outside air out.
Mbuji-Mayi
Open them to air the house.

Masks

Kinshasa
Sensitive groups: an N95 outdoors.
Mbuji-Mayi
Not needed.

Air purifier

Kinshasa
Run one, especially in bedrooms.
Mbuji-Mayi
Not needed.

Against everywhere else

How do Kinshasa and Mbuji-Mayi compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Kinshasa's air is cleaner than 16% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Mbuji-Mayi's is cleaner than 77%. Within Democratic Republic of the Congo, that is 0% and 92% of its 38 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Kinshasa
Beats 16%
Mbuji-Mayi
Beats 77%

More tree cover than…

Kinshasa
Beats 2%
Mbuji-Mayi
Beats 62%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which has lost more forest, Kinshasa or Mbuji-Mayi?

Kinshasa has lost more: about 100 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 25 ha around Mbuji-Mayi. 66 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Kinshasa
20012025

Worst year: 2023, with 29 ha lost.

Mbuji-Mayi
20012025

Worst year: 2004, with 6 ha lost.

Forest loss around Kinshasa and Mbuji-Mayi, 2001 to 2025
KinshasaMbuji-Mayi
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.100 ha25 ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.9.5% (better)15%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.66 ha25 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Too little to callToo little to call
Main known causeTowns and roads (64%)Farms, pasture and plantations (74%)

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Kinshasa

Satellite image of the area around Kinshasa, July 2017

2017: satellite photo from July 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 7 km west of the city center.

Mbuji-Mayi

Satellite image of the area around Mbuji-Mayi, July 2017

2017: satellite photo from July 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Kinshasa or Mbuji-Mayi?

Mbuji-Mayi has more tree cover: 26.8% of the land within 2 km of its center against 1.0% around Kinshasa, or about 84,195 trees against 3,129.

Kinshasa1.0% of a 35% target
Mbuji-Mayi26.8% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Kinshasa and Mbuji-Mayi
KinshasaMbuji-Mayi
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.3.1K84.2K (better)
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.106K10.1K (better)
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.68.8K kg1.9M kg (better)

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Kinshasa1.0% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 15, 2026
Mbuji-Mayi26.8% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 9, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Kinshasa vs Mbuji-Mayi: your questions answered

Is Mbuji-Mayi cleaner than Kinshasa?

On air quality, yes, right now: Mbuji-Mayi reads AQI 32 against 121, a gap of 89 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Mbuji-Mayi averaged AQI 53 against 58, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Kinshasa and Mbuji-Mayi today?

In Kinshasa, at AQI 121: Sensitive groups should limit long or intense outdoor activity. In Mbuji-Mayi, at AQI 32: Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.

Which has lost more forest, Kinshasa or Mbuji-Mayi?

Kinshasa has lost more: about 100 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 25 ha around Mbuji-Mayi. 66 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Which has more trees, Kinshasa or Mbuji-Mayi?

Mbuji-Mayi has more tree cover: 26.8% of the land within 2 km of its center against 1.0% around Kinshasa, or about 84,195 trees against 3,129. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Kinshasa and Mbuji-Mayi need?

Kinshasa needs about 106,387 more to reach its canopy target of 35%, and Mbuji-Mayi about 10,053 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Kinshasa and Mbuji-Mayi measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Kinshasa is read from a nearby ground station and Mbuji-Mayi is a model estimate, so the two are not quite like for like. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Kinshasa vs Mbuji-Mayi comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 15, 2026 and Sep 9, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Kinshasa with somewhere else

This place

Kinshasa