Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Kenya, 728 km apart

Kakamega vs Mombasa Air quality index (AQI) today

Mombasa has cleaner air than Kakamega right now: AQI 43 (Good) against 47 (Good).

Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Mombasa averaged AQI 53 against 73, and it was the cleaner of the two on 7 of those days. Mombasa has lost more forest since 2001. Kakamega has more tree cover.

Kakamega

Kenya

AQI 47

Good

PM2.5
7.1 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 10, 12:00 local
Mombasa

Kenya

AQI 43

Good

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
7.7 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 10, 22:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Kakamega vs Mombasa at a glance

Kakamega is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and Mombasa on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Kakamega and Mombasa compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
KakamegaMombasa
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.4743 (better)
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.7.1 (better)7.7
Past week's averageUS AQI, 7 days.7353 (better)
Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center.483 ha (better)804 ha
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.53.4% (better)11.9%
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.0 (better)47.9K

Air quality today

What is the air like in Kakamega and Mombasa right now?

Mombasa has cleaner air than Kakamega right now: AQI 43 (Good) against 47 (Good). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either.

KakamegaMombasa

7.1PM2.5, µg/m³7.7
6.7PM10, µg/m³11.4
0.6Nitrogen dioxide, µg/m³4.2
76Ozone, µg/m³25

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Kakamega: Estimate · model corrected with 3 station cities within 245 km, e.g. Mukono and Kampala. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, corrected with 3 ground-station cities within 245 km, US EPA index.

Mombasa: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 7 days?

Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Mombasa averaged AQI 53 against 73, and it was the cleaner of the two on 7 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Kakamega0Mombasa7
Average AQI
Kakamega73Mombasa53
Worst day, AQI
Kakamega84Mombasa57
KakamegaMombasa
50Nov 4Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10
The daily numbers (7 days)
Daily air quality index for Kakamega and Mombasa
DayKakamegaMombasa
Nov 48457
Nov 57147
Nov 66251
Nov 77453
Nov 87657
Nov 96753
Nov 108052

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Kakamega and Mombasa today?

Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Both are in the same EPA band today (Good), so the advice is the same.

Exercise outdoors

A good day to be active outside.

Windows

Open them to air the house.

Masks

Not needed.

Air purifier

Not needed.

Against everywhere else

How do Kakamega and Mombasa compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Kakamega's air is cleaner than 64% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Mombasa's is cleaner than 67%. Within Kenya, that is 76% and 84% of its 26 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Kakamega
Beats 64%
Mombasa
Beats 67%

More tree cover than…

Kakamega
Beats 94%
Mombasa
Beats 26%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which has lost more forest, Kakamega or Mombasa?

Mombasa has lost more: about 804 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 483 ha around Kakamega. 797 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Kakamega
20012025

Worst year: 2018, with 82 ha lost.

Mombasa
20012025

Worst year: 2008, with 174 ha lost.

Forest loss around Kakamega and Mombasa, 2001 to 2025
KakamegaMombasa
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.483 ha (better)804 ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.9.5% (better)28%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.348 ha (better)797 ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Too little to callToo little to call
Main known causeFarms, pasture and plantations (62%)Towns and roads (86%)

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Kakamega

Satellite image of the area around Kakamega, March 2017

2017: satellite photo from March 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 6 km northeast of the city center.

Mombasa

Satellite image of the area around Mombasa, November 2018

2018: satellite photo from November 2018 of a 5 × 5 km area about 5 km southwest of the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Kakamega or Mombasa?

Kakamega has more tree cover: 53.4% of the land within 2 km of its center against 11.9% around Mombasa, or about 167,761 trees against 31,478.

Kakamega53.4% of a 30% target
Mombasa11.9% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Kakamega and Mombasa
KakamegaMombasa
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.168K (better)31.5K
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.0 (better)47.9K
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.3.7M kg (better)693K kg

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Kakamega53.4% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 12, 2026
Mombasa11.9% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 8, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Kakamega vs Mombasa: your questions answered

Is Mombasa cleaner than Kakamega?

On air quality, yes, right now: Mombasa reads AQI 43 against 47, a gap of 4 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Mombasa averaged AQI 53 against 73, and it was the cleaner of the two on 7 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Kakamega and Mombasa today?

The advice is the same for both today. Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Kakamega reads AQI 47 and Mombasa reads AQI 43.

Which has lost more forest, Kakamega or Mombasa?

Mombasa has lost more: about 804 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 483 ha around Kakamega. 797 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Which has more trees, Kakamega or Mombasa?

Kakamega has more tree cover: 53.4% of the land within 2 km of its center against 11.9% around Mombasa, or about 167,761 trees against 31,478. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Kakamega and Mombasa need?

Kakamega needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Mombasa about 47,878 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Kakamega and Mombasa measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Kakamega vs Mombasa comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 12, 2026 and Sep 8, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Kakamega with somewhere else

This place

Kakamega