Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Mozambique, 758 km apart

Chimoio vs Nampula Air quality index (AQI) today

Chimoio has cleaner air than Nampula right now: AQI 25 (Good) against 26 (Good).

Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. But over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Nampula averaged AQI 39 against 51, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. Chimoio has lost more forest since 2001. Chimoio has more tree cover.

Chimoio

Mozambique

AQI 25

Good

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
4.5 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 10, 11:00 local
Nampula

Mozambique

AQI 26

Good

PM2.5
4.5 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 11, 10:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Chimoio vs Nampula at a glance

Chimoio is ahead on 3 of 6 measures, and Nampula on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Chimoio and Nampula compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
ChimoioNampula
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.25 (better)26
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.4.54.5
Past week's averageUS AQI, 6 days.5139 (better)
Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center.575 ha113 ha (better)
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.15.6% (better)7.3%
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.45.2K (better)71.3K

Air quality today

What is the air like in Chimoio and Nampula right now?

Chimoio has cleaner air than Nampula right now: AQI 25 (Good) against 26 (Good). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either.

ChimoioNampula

4.5PM2.5, µg/m³4.5
6PM10, µg/m³6.1
0.2Nitrogen dioxide, µg/m³0.2
60Ozone, µg/m³74

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Chimoio: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

Nampula: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 6 days?

But over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Nampula averaged AQI 39 against 51, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Chimoio2Nampula4
Average AQI
Chimoio51Nampula39
Worst day, AQI
Chimoio69Nampula52
ChimoioNampula
50Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10
The daily numbers (6 days)
Daily air quality index for Chimoio and Nampula
DayChimoioNampula
Nov 55752
Nov 65925
Nov 76936
Nov 86536
Nov 92852
Nov 103034

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Chimoio and Nampula today?

Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Both are in the same EPA band today (Good), so the advice is the same.

Exercise outdoors

A good day to be active outside.

Windows

Open them to air the house.

Masks

Not needed.

Air purifier

Not needed.

Against everywhere else

How do Chimoio and Nampula compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Chimoio's air is cleaner than 85% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Nampula's is cleaner than 84%. Within Mozambique, that is 94% and 88% of its 17 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Chimoio
Beats 85%
Nampula
Beats 84%

More tree cover than…

Chimoio
Beats 36%
Nampula
Beats 15%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which has lost more forest, Chimoio or Nampula?

Chimoio has lost more: about 575 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 113 ha around Nampula. 574 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Chimoio
20012025

Worst year: 2006, with 62 ha lost.

Nampula
20012025

Worst year: 2010, with 20 ha lost.

Forest loss around Chimoio and Nampula, 2001 to 2025
ChimoioNampula
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.575 ha113 ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.20% (better)53%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.574 ha113 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Too little to callToo little to call
Main known causeFarms, pasture and plantations (90%)Towns and roads (69%)

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Chimoio

Satellite image of the area around Chimoio, September 2017

2017: satellite photo from September 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 6 km east of the city center.

Nampula

Satellite image of the area around Nampula, November 2017

2017: satellite photo from November 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Chimoio or Nampula?

Chimoio has more tree cover: 15.6% of the land within 2 km of its center against 7.3% around Nampula, or about 49,009 trees against 22,934.

Chimoio15.6% of a 30% target
Nampula7.3% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Chimoio and Nampula
ChimoioNampula
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.49.0K (better)22.9K
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.45.2K (better)71.3K
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.1.1M kg (better)505K kg

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Chimoio15.6% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 14, 2026
Nampula7.3% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 18, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Chimoio vs Nampula: your questions answered

Is Chimoio cleaner than Nampula?

On air quality, yes, right now: Chimoio reads AQI 25 against 26, a gap of 1 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. But over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Nampula averaged AQI 39 against 51, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Chimoio and Nampula today?

The advice is the same for both today. Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Chimoio reads AQI 25 and Nampula reads AQI 26.

Which has lost more forest, Chimoio or Nampula?

Chimoio has lost more: about 575 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 113 ha around Nampula. 574 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Which has more trees, Chimoio or Nampula?

Chimoio has more tree cover: 15.6% of the land within 2 km of its center against 7.3% around Nampula, or about 49,009 trees against 22,934. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Chimoio and Nampula need?

Chimoio needs about 45,239 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Nampula about 71,314 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Chimoio and Nampula measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Chimoio vs Nampula comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 14, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Chimoio with somewhere else

This place

Chimoio