Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Mozambique, 705 km apart

Beira vs Nampula Air quality index (AQI) today

Nampula has cleaner air than Beira right now: AQI 26 (Good) against 27 (Good).

Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Nampula averaged AQI 39 against 46, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. Beira has lost more forest since 2001. Beira has more tree cover.

Beira

Mozambique

AQI 27

Good

PM2.5
5.6 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 10, 19:00 local
Nampula

Mozambique

AQI 26

Good

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
4.5 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 11, 10:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Beira vs Nampula at a glance

Nampula is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and Beira on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Beira and Nampula compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
BeiraNampula
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.2726 (better)
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.5.64.5 (better)
Past week's averageUS AQI, 6 days.4639 (better)
Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center.334 ha113 ha (better)
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.7.6% (better)7.3%
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.32.6K (better)71.3K

Air quality today

What is the air like in Beira and Nampula right now?

Nampula has cleaner air than Beira right now: AQI 26 (Good) against 27 (Good). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either.

BeiraNampula

5.6PM2.5, µg/m³4.5
8.6PM10, µg/m³6.1
0.5Nitrogen dioxide, µg/m³0.2
61Ozone, µg/m³74

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Beira: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

Nampula: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 6 days?

Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Nampula averaged AQI 39 against 46, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Beira2Nampula4
Average AQI
Beira46Nampula39
Worst day, AQI
Beira56Nampula52
BeiraNampula
50Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10
The daily numbers (6 days)
Daily air quality index for Beira and Nampula
DayBeiraNampula
Nov 55652
Nov 65225
Nov 75336
Nov 85636
Nov 93652
Nov 102234

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Beira and Nampula today?

Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Both are in the same EPA band today (Good), so the advice is the same.

Exercise outdoors

A good day to be active outside.

Windows

Open them to air the house.

Masks

Not needed.

Air purifier

Not needed.

Against everywhere else

How do Beira and Nampula compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Beira's air is cleaner than 83% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Nampula's is cleaner than 84%. Within Mozambique, that is 81% and 88% of its 17 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Beira
Beats 83%
Nampula
Beats 84%

More tree cover than…

Beira
Beats 15%
Nampula
Beats 15%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which has lost more forest, Beira or Nampula?

Beira has lost more: about 334 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 113 ha around Nampula. 43 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Beira
20012025

Worst year: 2019, with 185 ha lost.

Nampula
20012025

Worst year: 2010, with 20 ha lost.

Forest loss around Beira and Nampula, 2001 to 2025
BeiraNampula
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.334 ha113 ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.17% (better)53%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.43 ha (better)113 ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Slowing downToo little to call
Main known causeStorms, floods and other natural causes (56%)Towns and roads (69%)

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Beira

Satellite image of the area around Beira, July 2017

2017: satellite photo from July 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 7 km northwest of the city center.

Nampula

Satellite image of the area around Nampula, November 2017

2017: satellite photo from November 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Beira or Nampula?

Beira has more tree cover: 7.6% of the land within 2 km of its center against 7.3% around Nampula, or about 11,055 trees against 22,934.

Beira7.6% of a 30% target
Nampula7.3% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Beira and Nampula
BeiraNampula
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.11.1K22.9K (better)
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.32.6K (better)71.3K
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.243K kg505K kg (better)

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Beira7.6% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 16, 2026
Nampula7.3% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 18, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Beira vs Nampula: your questions answered

Is Nampula cleaner than Beira?

On air quality, yes, right now: Nampula reads AQI 26 against 27, a gap of 1 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Nampula averaged AQI 39 against 46, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Beira and Nampula today?

The advice is the same for both today. Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Beira reads AQI 27 and Nampula reads AQI 26.

Which has lost more forest, Beira or Nampula?

Beira has lost more: about 334 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 113 ha around Nampula. 43 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Which has more trees, Beira or Nampula?

Beira has more tree cover: 7.6% of the land within 2 km of its center against 7.3% around Nampula, or about 11,055 trees against 22,934. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Beira and Nampula need?

Beira needs about 32,582 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Nampula about 71,314 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Beira and Nampula measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Beira vs Nampula comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 16, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Beira with somewhere else

This place

Beira