Deforestation · 10 km around the city · 2001–2025
Deforestation around Belgrade
Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Belgrade has lost about 460 hectares of forest (about 640 football pitches): 11% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it was lost to logging, so much of it can grow back. About 45 hectares (9.8%) was deforestation: forest cleared for good for farms, mines or towns.
- Forest in 2000
- 4,310 hawithin 10 km of the centre
- Forest lost since 2001
- 460 ha11% of it, about 640 football pitches
- Cleared for good
- 45 hadeforestation, 9.8% of the loss
- Worst year
- 201671 ha lost
Satellite timelapse
2017: satellite photo from August 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 5 km north-east of the city centre.
Satellite photos of the same 5 × 5 km area, one per year, all taken in the same season so the colours compare. You can see forest being cleared and towns spreading, though not single trees. Download the before/after image (free to reuse with credit to Airleaf).
Year by year
Forest lost around Belgrade, year by year
The worst year was 2016, when about 71 hectares of forest were lost.
Hectares of forest lost each year
Show the figures as a table
| Year | Cleared for good | Can grow back | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 1 ha | 33 ha | 35 ha |
| 2002 | under 1 ha | 1 ha | 2 ha |
| 2003 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | 2 ha |
| 2004 | 7 ha | 41 ha | 47 ha |
| 2005 | 2 ha | 6 ha | 8 ha |
| 2006 | 2 ha | 26 ha | 28 ha |
| 2007 | 4 ha | 7 ha | 11 ha |
| 2008 | 4 ha | 47 ha | 50 ha |
| 2009 | 3 ha | 23 ha | 25 ha |
| 2010 | 3 ha | 28 ha | 30 ha |
| 2011 | 2 ha | 18 ha | 20 ha |
| 2012 | under 1 ha | 7 ha | 8 ha |
| 2013 | under 1 ha | 3 ha | 3 ha |
| 2014 | under 1 ha | 20 ha | 21 ha |
| 2015 | 3 ha | 9 ha | 12 ha |
| 2016 | under 1 ha | 71 ha | 71 ha |
| 2017 | 2 ha | 25 ha | 27 ha |
| 2018 | 2 ha | under 1 ha | 2 ha |
| 2019 | 2 ha | under 1 ha | 2 ha |
| 2020 | 2 ha | under 1 ha | 2 ha |
| 2021 | under 1 ha | 17 ha | 18 ha |
| 2022 | 1 ha | 7 ha | 9 ha |
| 2023 | 2 ha | 19 ha | 20 ha |
| 2024 | 1 ha | 1 ha | 3 ha |
| 2025 | 1 ha | 4 ha | 5 ha |
Forest gained and lost, 2000–2020
- Forest in 2000
- 6,660 ha
- Forest in 2020
- 6,730 ha
- Overall change
- +74 hamore forest than in 2000
Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Belgrade stayed about the same size, at about 6,730 hectares: new forest grew on about 383 hectares, and about 309 hectares were lost.
These 2000 and 2020 maps, from the University of Maryland, count any land with trees taller than 5 m as forest, including plantations and orchards. Forest that was cut or burned and had grown back by 2020 counts in both years, so the loss here is smaller than the yearly figures.
Causes
What is causing deforestation around Belgrade?
- 9.8%cleared for good (deforestation)
- 88%can grow back (fire, logging, storms)
- 2.2%cause unknown
- Logging88% · 405 ha
Can grow back. Trees cut for timber or paper. The land usually stays forest and grows back.
- Towns and roads9.8% · 45 ha
Cleared for good. Forest replaced by houses, buildings and roads.
- Unknown causes2.3% · 11 ha
Cause unknown. The satellites saw the trees go, but not why.
Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.
Nearby cities losing forest
| City | Forest lost (10 km) | Share of its forest | Cleared for good |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina | 319 ha | 2.3% | 201 ha |
| Pristina, Kosovo | 449 ha | 5.7% | 60 ha |
| Tirana, Albania | 582 ha | 11% | 171 ha |
Use this data
Put Belgrade's forest loss on your site
Free to embed, with a link back to the full figures.
Frequently asked
Questions about deforestation around Belgrade
How much forest has Belgrade lost since 2001?
Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Belgrade has lost about 460 hectares of forest (about 640 football pitches): 11% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it was lost to logging, so much of it can grow back. About 45 hectares (9.8%) was deforestation: forest cleared for good for farms, mines or towns.
What is causing deforestation around Belgrade?
The main causes of forest loss since 2001 are logging (88%), towns and roads (9.8%). About 45 hectares was deforestation, meaning forest cleared for good for farms, mines or towns. Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.
What was the worst year for forest loss around Belgrade?
The worst year was 2016, when about 71 hectares of forest were lost.
Is the forest around Belgrade growing or shrinking?
Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Belgrade stayed about the same size, at about 6,730 hectares: new forest grew on about 383 hectares, and about 309 hectares were lost. These 2000 and 2020 maps, from the University of Maryland, count any land with trees taller than 5 m as forest, including plantations and orchards. Forest that was cut or burned and had grown back by 2020 counts in both years, so the loss here is smaller than the yearly figures.
Can I see satellite images of Belgrade over the years?
Yes. The timelapse at the top of this page has a satellite photo for every year from 2017 to 2026 of a 5 × 5 km area near Belgrade, where the most forest was lost. Press play to watch it change, or turn on "Show cleared forest" to see exactly where trees were lost.
How is forest loss measured?
We use satellite maps from the University of Maryland (Hansen and colleagues) that show, for every 30 × 30 m patch of land on Earth, the year its trees were cut down, burned or died, from 2001 to 2025. We add up those patches within 10 km of the centre of Belgrade, counting only places that were at least 30% covered by trees in 2000. The cause of each loss comes from a map made by the World Resources Institute and Google DeepMind. All figures are estimates.