Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Zambia, 275 km apart

Lusaka vs Ndola Air quality index (AQI) today

Ndola has cleaner air than Lusaka right now: AQI 58 (Moderate) against 86 (Moderate).

Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Ndola averaged AQI 67 against 68, and it was the cleaner of the two on 3 of those days. Ndola has lost more forest since 2001. Ndola has more tree cover.

Lusaka

Zambia

AQI 86

Moderate

PM2.5
27.8 µg/m³1.9× WHO guideline
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Ground station
Reading
Nov 11, 20:00 local
Ndola

Zambia

AQI 58

Moderate

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
11.8 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 11, 08:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Lusaka vs Ndola at a glance

Ndola is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Lusaka on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

Lusaka and Ndola compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
LusakaNdola
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.8658 (better)
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.27.811.8 (better)
Past week's averageUS AQI, 6 days.6867 (better)
Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center.8 ha (better)2,860 ha
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.13.3%22.8% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.52.5K22.6K (better)

Air quality today

What is the air like in Lusaka and Ndola right now?

Ndola has cleaner air than Lusaka right now: AQI 58 (Moderate) against 86 (Moderate). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Lusaka's PM2.5 is about 1.9× the WHO's 24-hour guideline of 15 µg/m³.

Lusaka is read from a nearby ground station and Ndola is a model estimate, so the two are not quite like for like.

LusakaNdola

27.8PM2.5, µg/m³11.8

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Lusaka: Ground station · Zambia Outdoor Demo, 14.4 km away. Data: OpenAQ · AirGradient, Communities Against Pollution (CAP).

Ndola: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 6 days?

Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Ndola averaged AQI 67 against 68, and it was the cleaner of the two on 3 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Lusaka3Ndola3
Average AQI
Lusaka68Ndola67
Worst day, AQI
Lusaka82Ndola79
LusakaNdola
50Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10
The daily numbers (6 days)
Daily air quality index for Lusaka and Ndola
DayLusakaNdola
Nov 56164
Nov 66479
Nov 78274
Nov 87959
Nov 97871
Nov 104655

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Lusaka and Ndola today?

Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. Both are in the same EPA band today (Moderate), so the advice is the same.

Exercise outdoors

Fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier.

Windows

Fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution.

Masks

Not needed for most people.

Air purifier

Worth running if you are sensitive.

Against everywhere else

How do Lusaka and Ndola compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Lusaka's air is cleaner than 27% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Ndola's is cleaner than 49%. Within Zambia, that is 18% and 47% of its 18 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Lusaka
Beats 27%
Ndola
Beats 49%

More tree cover than…

Lusaka
Beats 30%
Ndola
Beats 53%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which has lost more forest, Lusaka or Ndola?

Ndola has lost more: about 2,860 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 8 ha around Lusaka. 278 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Lusaka
20012025

Worst year: 2009, with 4 ha lost.

Ndola
20012025

Worst year: 2012, with 1,150 ha lost.

Forest loss around Lusaka and Ndola, 2001 to 2025
LusakaNdola
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.8 ha (better)2,860 ha
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.8 ha (better)278 ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Too little to callToo little to call
Main known causeTowns and roads (100%)Logging (90%)

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Lusaka

Satellite image of the area around Lusaka, September 2017

2017: satellite photo from September 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Ndola

Satellite image of the area around Ndola, September 2017

2017: satellite photo from September 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 5 km west of the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Lusaka or Ndola?

Ndola has more tree cover: 22.8% of the land within 2 km of its center against 13.3% around Lusaka, or about 71,628 trees against 41,783.

Lusaka13.3% of a 30% target
Ndola22.8% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Lusaka and Ndola
LusakaNdola
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.41.8K71.6K (better)
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.52.5K22.6K (better)
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.919K kg1.6M kg (better)

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Lusaka13.3% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 17, 2026
Ndola22.8% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 17, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Lusaka vs Ndola: your questions answered

Is Ndola cleaner than Lusaka?

On air quality, yes, right now: Ndola reads AQI 58 against 86, a gap of 28 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Ndola averaged AQI 67 against 68, and it was the cleaner of the two on 3 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Lusaka and Ndola today?

The advice is the same for both today. Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. Lusaka reads AQI 86 and Ndola reads AQI 58.

Which has lost more forest, Lusaka or Ndola?

Ndola has lost more: about 2,860 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 8 ha around Lusaka. 278 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Which has more trees, Lusaka or Ndola?

Ndola has more tree cover: 22.8% of the land within 2 km of its center against 13.3% around Lusaka, or about 71,628 trees against 41,783. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Lusaka and Ndola need?

Lusaka needs about 52,465 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Ndola about 22,619 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Lusaka and Ndola measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Lusaka is read from a nearby ground station and Ndola is a model estimate, so the two are not quite like for like. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Lusaka vs Ndola comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 17, 2026 and Sep 17, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Lusaka with somewhere else

This place

Lusaka