Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · South Korea, 330 km apart

Busan vs Seoul Air quality index (AQI) today

Busan has cleaner air than Seoul right now: AQI 71 (Moderate) against 90 (Moderate).

Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Busan averaged AQI 52 against 66, and it was the cleaner of the two on 6 of those days. Busan has lost more forest since 2001. Seoul has more tree cover.

Busan

South Korea

AQI 71

Moderate

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
20 µg/m³1.3× WHO guideline
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Ground station
Reading
Nov 12, 01:00 local
Seoul

South Korea

AQI 90

Moderate

PM2.5
30 µg/m³2.0× WHO guideline
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Ground station
Reading
Nov 12, 01:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Busan vs Seoul at a glance

Busan is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and Seoul on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Busan and Seoul compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
BusanSeoul
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.71 (better)90
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.20 (better)30
Past week's averageUS AQI, 6 days.52 (better)66
Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center.91 ha14 ha (better)
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.19.6%20.3% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.26.3K (better)30.3K

Air quality today

What is the air like in Busan and Seoul right now?

Busan has cleaner air than Seoul right now: AQI 71 (Moderate) against 90 (Moderate). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Busan's PM2.5 is about 1.3× the WHO's 24-hour guideline of 15 µg/m³. Seoul's PM2.5 is about 2.0× the WHO's 24-hour guideline of 15 µg/m³.

Both readings come from nearby ground stations.

BusanSeoul

20PM2.5, µg/m³30
36PM10, µg/m³45
52.5Nitrogen dioxide, µg/m³84.5
10.6Ozone, µg/m³2.2

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Busan: Ground station · 광복동, 200 m away · median of 17 stations. Data: OpenAQ · Korea Air Ministry of Environment, Korea Environment Corporation · AirKorea.

Seoul: Ground station · 중구, 300 m away · median of 25 stations. Data: OpenAQ · Korea Air Ministry of Environment, Korea Environment Corporation · AirKorea.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 6 days?

Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Busan averaged AQI 52 against 66, and it was the cleaner of the two on 6 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Busan6Seoul0
Average AQI
Busan52Seoul66
Worst day, AQI
Busan59Seoul92
BusanSeoul
50Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10
The daily numbers (6 days)
Daily air quality index for Busan and Seoul
DayBusanSeoul
Nov 55392
Nov 64952
Nov 74754
Nov 85968
Nov 95558
Nov 104769

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Busan and Seoul today?

Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. Both are in the same EPA band today (Moderate), so the advice is the same.

Exercise outdoors

Fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier.

Windows

Fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution.

Masks

Not needed for most people.

Air purifier

Worth running if you are sensitive.

Against everywhere else

How do Busan and Seoul compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Busan's air is cleaner than 37% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Seoul's is cleaner than 26%. Within South Korea, that is 64% and 24% of its 56 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Busan
Beats 37%
Seoul
Beats 26%

More tree cover than…

Busan
Beats 46%
Seoul
Beats 48%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which has lost more forest, Busan or Seoul?

Busan has lost more: about 91 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 14 ha around Seoul. 74 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Busan
20012025

Worst year: 2004, with 18 ha lost.

Seoul
20012025

Worst year: 2023, with 2 ha lost.

Forest loss around Busan and Seoul, 2001 to 2025
BusanSeoul
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.91 ha14 ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.1.6%under 1% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.74 ha7 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Too little to callToo little to call
Main known causeTowns and roads (81%)Towns and roads (53%)

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Busan

Satellite image of the area around Busan, September 2017

2017: satellite photo from September 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Seoul

Satellite image of the area around Seoul, June 2017

2017: satellite photo from June 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Busan or Seoul?

Seoul has more tree cover: 20.3% of the land within 2 km of its center against 19.6% around Busan, or about 63,328 trees against 49,568.

Busan19.6% of a 30% target
Seoul20.3% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Busan and Seoul
BusanSeoul
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.49.6K63.3K (better)
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.26.3K (better)30.3K
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.1.1M kg1.4M kg (better)

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Busan19.6% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 12, 2026
Seoul20.3% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 18, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Busan vs Seoul: your questions answered

Is Busan cleaner than Seoul?

On air quality, yes, right now: Busan reads AQI 71 against 90, a gap of 19 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Busan averaged AQI 52 against 66, and it was the cleaner of the two on 6 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Busan and Seoul today?

The advice is the same for both today. Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. Busan reads AQI 71 and Seoul reads AQI 90.

Which has lost more forest, Busan or Seoul?

Busan has lost more: about 91 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 14 ha around Seoul. 74 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Which has more trees, Busan or Seoul?

Seoul has more tree cover: 20.3% of the land within 2 km of its center against 19.6% around Busan, or about 63,328 trees against 49,568. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Busan and Seoul need?

Busan needs about 26,301 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Seoul about 30,260 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Busan and Seoul measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings come from nearby ground stations. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Busan vs Seoul comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 12, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Busan with somewhere else

This place

Busan