Skip to content
Airleaf
Air quality now: Lhasa

China · Tibet · 4 cities

Air quality in Tibet today The AQI right now, city by city

Right now, Lhoka has the cleanest air of the 4 cities we track in Tibet (AQI 8, Good), and Doilungdêqên the worst (AQI 33, Good). Nyingchi has the most tree cover, at 26.0% — #212 of 639 cities measured in China.

Every city is measured the same way, over the same 2 km around its center: the air quality right now, from ground stations where there are any, and its tree cover.

AQI 21

Average right now

Good

US EPA index, across 4 cities
cities tracked
4
average tree cover
12.1%
China: 22.9%
worst air now: Doilungdêqên
33
cleanest air now: Lhoka
8

Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf, refreshed hourly.

Tibet · average AQI 21

Air quality today across Tibet, city by city

Current air quality and tree cover for cities in Tibet, China
Lhasa33Good14.2%45.3K#447 of 639
Lhoka8Good6.0%75.3K#623 of 639
Nyingchi9Good26.0%12.2K#212 of 639
Doilungdêqên33Good2.3%84.3K#638 of 639

Air quality is the US AQI from ground monitoring stations via OpenAQ where available, otherwise the Open-Meteo / CAMS model, refreshed hourly. Tree cover is measured within 2 km of each city center from Sentinel-2 imagery; the rank compares every city measured in China.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

How much forest has Tibet lost?

Since 2001, Tibet has lost about 38,600 hectares of forest (about 54,000 football pitches): 1.4% of the forest it had in 2000. The biggest cause was logging (36%), after which forest can grow back. About 4,750 hectares (12%) was deforestation: forest cleared for good for farms, mines or towns.

Forest lost since 2001
38,600 haabout 54,000 football pitches
Share of its forest
1.4%of what there was in 2000
Cleared for good
4,750 hadeforestation: turned into farms, mines or towns
Forest lost each year in Tibet, 2001–2025

Hectares of forest lost each year

Forest lost each year in Tibet, 2001–2025. Use the left and right arrow keys to read each year.3.68K

Show the figures as a table
Forest lost each year in Tibet, 2001–2025
YearCleared for goodCan grow backTotal
200193 ha1,650 ha1,740 ha
200272 ha1,410 ha1,480 ha
200377 ha2,170 ha2,240 ha
2004131 ha1,630 ha1,760 ha
200589 ha1,930 ha2,020 ha
2006105 ha1,690 ha1,790 ha
2007158 ha3,520 ha3,680 ha
2008120 ha1,780 ha1,900 ha
2009148 ha1,790 ha1,940 ha
2010147 ha994 ha1,140 ha
201179 ha650 ha729 ha
201285 ha1,170 ha1,260 ha
201368 ha404 ha472 ha
201459 ha253 ha311 ha
201527 ha127 ha154 ha
2016250 ha915 ha1,170 ha
2017200 ha2,370 ha2,570 ha
2018179 ha1,410 ha1,590 ha
2019182 ha1,120 ha1,300 ha
2020261 ha958 ha1,220 ha
2021387 ha1,410 ha1,800 ha
2022480 ha723 ha1,200 ha
2023502 ha572 ha1,070 ha
2024456 ha852 ha1,310 ha
2025395 ha2,330 ha2,720 ha

Forest loss has stayed about the same: about 1,620 hectares a year in 2021–2025, against 1,570 hectares a year in 2016–2020. The worst year was 2007, when about 3,680 hectares of forest were lost.

What is causing deforestation in Tibet?

  • Loggingcan grow back36% · 13,800 ha
  • Storms, floods and other natural causescan grow back26% · 10,200 ha
  • Wildfirescan grow back16% · 6,280 ha

Also: towns and roads, mining and energy, farms, pasture and plantations, shifting farming, unknown causes.

Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.

Source: Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA, Global Forest Change (GFC-2025-v1.13); causes: WRI/Google DeepMind drivers of forest loss; both CC BY 4.0, summed by Airleaf for each area. How it's measured

Other provinces in China

Clean-air buying guides

Cleaner air at home in Tibet

Picked by tested clean-air delivery rate (CADR), noise and running cost, from independent test labels. No brand pays to be listed.

All buying guides

Your own street

Check any address in Tibet, not just the big cities.

Open the map