Skip to content
Airleaf

City report · Pará, Brazil

Castanhal Air quality today

Air quality in Castanhal currently reads AQI 52 (Moderate): Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.

Air quality right now

AQI 52

Moderate

Main pollutant: PM2.5
PM2.5, fine particles (µg/m³)
10.3
tree cover
9.6%
trees in this area
30.2K
more trees needed
64.1K

Measured across a 2 km radius around Centro, Castanhal - PA, Brazil (12.57 km²), from a satellite image of Oct 31, 2026. Lower AQI is better: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous.

Castanhal · AQI 52 (Moderate)

Dark green marks tree cover detected inside the study radius.Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, captured Oct 31, 2026

Castanhal's tree count comes to 30,159 trees across 12.57 km², 20 points below the 30% tree-cover level considered healthy for this area, so roughly 64,088 more trees would close the gap.

Air quality detail

Air quality in Castanhal today: AQI 52, Moderate

Main pollutant: PM2.5 · Observed Nov 10, 21:00 local time via Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index. Values in µg/m³.

Model estimate · no ground station nearby

Health signal

Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.

PM2.5

10.3

PM10

12.2

NO₂

8.0

O₃

20.0

SO₂

1.3

CO

131.0

Outdoor exercise
Fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier
Windows
Fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution
Mask
Not needed for most people
Air purifier
Worth running if you are sensitive

Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Castanhal's daily AQI at 40 on average, from 28 on Nov 4 to an hourly peak of 57 on Nov 8.

Last 7 daysavg 40 · peak 57
Nov 4: AQI 28 (peak 37)Nov 5: AQI 38 (peak 48)Nov 6: AQI 44 (peak 55)Nov 7: AQI 46 (peak 54)Nov 8: AQI 43 (peak 57)Nov 9: AQI 42 (peak 55)Nov 10: AQI 38 (peak 52)
Nov 4Nov 10

Where Castanhal stands: the most polluted cities in the world right now · the cleanest

Tree cover detail

Tree cover in Castanhal: Critically low

9.6% tree cover against a 30% healthy-neighborhood target, across 12.57 km².

20 points below target

Trees in this area

30,159

Target trees

94,247

More trees needed

64,088

CO₂ if planted / yr

1,410 t

Deforestation · 2001–2025

How much forest has Castanhal lost?

Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Castanhal has lost about 7,730 hectares of forest (about 11,000 football pitches): 39% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it (97%) was deforestation, forest cleared for good, mainly for farms, pasture and plantations.

Satellite image of the area around Castanhal, July 2017

2017: satellite photo from July 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 7 km south of the city center.

Forest lost since 2001
7,730 haabout 11,000 football pitches
Share of its forest
39%of what there was in 2000
Cleared for good
7,500 hadeforestation: turned into farms, mines or towns

Forest loss is slowing down: about 217 hectares a year in 2021–2025, down from 360 hectares a year in 2016–2020. The worst year was 2018, when about 591 hectares of forest were lost.

Forest lost each year around Castanhal, 2001–2025

Hectares of forest lost each year

Forest lost each year around Castanhal, 2001–2025. Use the left and right arrow keys to read each year.591

Show the figures as a table
Forest lost each year around Castanhal, 2001–2025
YearCleared for goodCan grow backTotal
2001379 ha10 ha389 ha
2002189 haunder 1 ha189 ha
2003342 ha5 ha347 ha
2004282 ha2 ha284 ha
2005285 ha2 ha287 ha
2006349 haunder 1 ha349 ha
2007384 ha1 ha385 ha
2008344 ha1 ha345 ha
2009269 ha7 ha276 ha
2010242 ha15 ha257 ha
2011349 ha38 ha387 ha
2012108 ha3 ha111 ha
2013385 ha10 ha395 ha
2014401 ha2 ha403 ha
2015447 ha1 ha448 ha
2016333 ha7 ha340 ha
2017348 ha4 ha352 ha
2018480 ha111 ha591 ha
2019246 ha11 ha257 ha
2020258 haunder 1 ha258 ha
2021129 ha1 ha130 ha
2022224 ha1 ha225 ha
2023261 ha2 ha263 ha
2024261 ha2 ha263 ha
2025203 haunder 1 ha203 ha

What is causing deforestation around Castanhal?

  • Farms, pasture and plantationscleared for good88% · 6,810 ha
  • Towns and roadscleared for good7.2% · 557 ha
  • Shifting farmingcan grow back1.8% · 140 ha

Also: mining and energy, logging, unknown causes.

Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.

Forest gained and lost, 2000–2020

Forest in 2000
9,980 ha
Forest in 2020
8,580 ha
Overall change
−1,410 haless forest than in 2000

Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Castanhal shrank from about 9,980 hectares to 8,580 hectares, a net loss of about 1,410 hectares (−14%). New forest grew on about 793 hectares, but 2,200 hectares were lost.

These 2000 and 2020 maps, from the University of Maryland, count any land with trees taller than 5 m as forest, including plantations and orchards. Forest that was cut or burned and had grown back by 2020 counts in both years, so the loss here is smaller than the yearly figures.

These figures cover everything within 10 km of the city center, a wider area than the report above, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Source: Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA, Global Forest Change (GFC-2025-v1.13); causes: WRI/Google DeepMind drivers of forest loss; both CC BY 4.0, summed by Airleaf for each area. Forest gained and lost 2000–2020: Potapov et al. 2022, UMD GLAD Global Land Cover and Land Use Change, CC BY 4.0. Images: contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data. How it's measured

In the same region

Measured cities near Castanhal

Same 2 km radius, same index — so they compare directly.

  • 50.2 km
    Tree cover
    27%
    Air quality
    61
  • Belém

    Brazil

    66.7 km
    Tree cover
    8%
    Air quality
    52
  • Barcarena

    Brazil

    81.2 km
    Tree cover
    64%
    Air quality
    44
  • 116.3 km
    Tree cover
    43%
    Air quality
    52
  • Bragança

    Brazil

    131.8 km
    Tree cover
    41%
    Air quality
    34
  • 199.6 km
    Tree cover
    10%
    Air quality
    59

Build your own

Compare Castanhal with anywhere

This place

Castanhal

Use this data

Put Castanhal's numbers on your site

Free to embed. Updates itself as the measurement refreshes.

Castanhal air quality (AQI) and tree cover — measured by Airleaf
HTML
Markdown

Frequently asked

Questions about Castanhal

What is the air quality (AQI) in Castanhal right now?

The latest reading for Castanhal shows an AQI of 52 (Moderate), observed Nov 10, 21:00 local time via Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index. The main pollutant is PM2.5. Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.

Is it safe to exercise outside in Castanhal today?

At AQI 52 (Moderate): fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier. Windows: fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution. Masks: not needed for most people. The reading changes through the day, so check again before a long run or ride.

What has the air quality in Castanhal been like this week?

Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Castanhal's daily AQI at 40 on average, from 28 on Nov 4 to an hourly peak of 57 on Nov 8. No day averaged above 100, the level where the air turns unhealthy for sensitive groups.

How much forest has the area around Castanhal lost since 2001?

Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Castanhal has lost about 7,730 hectares of forest (about 11,000 football pitches): 39% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it (97%) was deforestation, forest cleared for good, mainly for farms, pasture and plantations. Forest loss is slowing down: about 217 hectares a year in 2021–2025, down from 360 hectares a year in 2016–2020. Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Castanhal shrank from about 9,980 hectares to 8,580 hectares, a net loss of about 1,410 hectares (−14%). New forest grew on about 793 hectares, but 2,200 hectares were lost.

What is the tree count in Castanhal?

Castanhal has an estimated 30,159 trees across the 12.57 km² measured — 9.6% tree cover, 20 percentage points short of the 30% tree-cover target set for this area.

How many more trees does Castanhal need?

Castanhal needs roughly 64,088 more trees to close a 20-point shortfall against its 30% tree-cover target — about 1,410 t of extra CO₂ absorbed per year once grown.

How are Castanhal's air quality and tree cover measured?

Air quality comes from ground monitoring stations via OpenAQ where one reports nearby, and otherwise, as here, from the Open-Meteo / CAMS model, which may differ from street-level monitors. Tree cover is measured from Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search satellite imagery at 10 m detail across a 2 km radius around Centro; the tree count is an estimate derived from that cover.

See your own area

What does your neighborhood look like?

Pick any point and radius to get the same air-quality and tree-cover breakdown.

Check my address