Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · United States, 203.8 mi (328 km) apart

New York vs Washington Air quality index (AQI) today

Washington has cleaner air than New York right now: AQI 64 (Moderate) against 84 (Moderate).

Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Washington averaged AQI 38 against 45, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. Washington has lost more forest since 2001. Washington has more tree cover.

New York

United States

AQI 84

Moderate

PM2.5
6.5 µg/m³
Main pollutant
NO₂
Source
Ground station
Reading
Nov 11, 10:00 local
Washington

United States

AQI 64

Moderate

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
16 µg/m³1.1× WHO guideline
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Ground station
Reading
Nov 11, 10:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

New York vs Washington at a glance

New York and Washington are level, each ahead on 3 of 6 measures. The better figure in each row is marked.

New York and Washington compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
New YorkWashington
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.8464 (better)
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.6.5 (better)16
Past week's averageUS AQI, 7 days.4538 (better)
Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center.94 acres (38 ha) (better)291 acres (118 ha)
Tree coverWithin 1.2 mi (2 km) of the center.14.9%18.6% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.24.5K (better)30.5K

Air quality today

What is the air like in New York and Washington right now?

Washington has cleaner air than New York right now: AQI 64 (Moderate) against 84 (Moderate). NO₂ is setting the index in New York, and PM2.5 in Washington.

Washington's PM2.5 is about 1.1× the WHO's 24-hour guideline of 15 µg/m³.

Both readings come from nearby ground stations.

New YorkWashington

6.5PM2.5, µg/m³16
161.8Nitrogen dioxide, µg/m³58.9

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

New York: Ground station · Jersey City FH, 2.5 mi (4.1 km) away · median of 6 stations. Data: OpenAQ · AirNow.

Washington: Ground station · King Greenleaf Rec C, 1.9 mi (3 km) away · median of 7 stations. Data: OpenAQ · AirNow.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 7 days?

Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Washington averaged AQI 38 against 45, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
New York3Washington4
Average AQI
New York45Washington38
Worst day, AQI
New York58Washington60
New YorkWashington
50Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10Nov 11
The daily numbers (7 days)
Daily air quality index for New York and Washington
DayNew YorkWashington
Nov 55335
Nov 65830
Nov 75027
Nov 82830
Nov 93627
Nov 104860
Nov 114357

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in New York and Washington today?

Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. Both are in the same EPA band today (Moderate), so the advice is the same.

Exercise outdoors

Fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier.

Windows

Fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution.

Masks

Not needed for most people.

Air purifier

Worth running if you are sensitive.

Against everywhere else

How do New York and Washington compare with the rest of the world?

Right now New York's air is cleaner than 29% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Washington's is cleaner than 44%. Within United States, that is 6% and 17% of its 308 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

New York
Beats 29%
Washington
Beats 44%

More tree cover than…

New York
Beats 34%
Washington
Beats 43%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which has lost more forest, New York or Washington?

Washington has lost more: about 291 acres (118 ha) of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 94 acres (38 ha) around New York. 259 acres (105 ha) of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

New York
20012025

Worst year: 2023, with 28 acres (11 ha) lost.

Washington
20012025

Worst year: 2012, with 30 acres (12 ha) lost.

Forest loss around New York and Washington, 2001 to 2025
New YorkWashington
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.94 acres (38 ha) (better)291 acres (118 ha)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.3.6%1.4% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.83 acres (33 ha) (better)259 acres (105 ha)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Too little to callToo little to call
Main known causeTowns and roads (87%)Towns and roads (89%)

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

New York

Satellite image of the area around New York, July 2017

2017: satellite photo from July 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Washington

Satellite image of the area around Washington, July 2017

2017: satellite photo from July 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, New York or Washington?

Washington has more tree cover: 18.6% of the land within 1.2 mi (2 km) of its center against 14.9% around New York, or about 49,727 trees against 24,154.

New York14.9% of a 30% target
Washington18.6% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for New York and Washington
New YorkWashington
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.24.2K49.7K (better)
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.24.5K (better)30.5K
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.531K kg1.1M kg (better)

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 1.2 mi (2 km) radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

New York14.9% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 8, 2026
Washington18.6% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 9, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 1.2 mi (2 km) of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

New York vs Washington: your questions answered

Is Washington cleaner than New York?

On air quality, yes, right now: Washington reads AQI 64 against 84, a gap of 20 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Washington averaged AQI 38 against 45, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in New York and Washington today?

The advice is the same for both today. Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. New York reads AQI 84 and Washington reads AQI 64.

Which has lost more forest, New York or Washington?

Washington has lost more: about 291 acres (118 ha) of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 94 acres (38 ha) around New York. 259 acres (105 ha) of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Which has more trees, New York or Washington?

Washington has more tree cover: 18.6% of the land within 1.2 mi (2 km) of its center against 14.9% around New York, or about 49,727 trees against 24,154. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do New York and Washington need?

New York needs about 24,478 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Washington about 30,478 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are New York and Washington measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings come from nearby ground stations. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the New York vs Washington comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 8, 2026 and Sep 9, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare New York with somewhere else

This place

New York