Air quality comparison · Myanmar, 245.4 mi (395 km) apart
Mawlamyine vs Nay Pyi Taw Air quality index (AQI) today
Mawlamyine has cleaner air than Nay Pyi Taw right now: AQI 9 (Good) against 19 (Good).
Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. But over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Nay Pyi Taw averaged AQI 46 against 55, and it was the cleaner of the two on 6 of those days. Mawlamyine has lost more forest since 2001. Nay Pyi Taw has more tree cover.
Myanmar
AQI 9
Good
Cleaner right now
- PM2.5
- 1.5 µg/m³
- Main pollutant
- PM2.5
- Source
- Model estimate
- Reading
- Nov 11, 04:30 local
Myanmar
AQI 19
Good
Cleaner right now
- PM2.5
- 3.6 µg/m³
- Main pollutant
- PM2.5
- Source
- Model estimate
- Reading
- Nov 11, 15:30 local
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Mawlamyine9Nay Pyi Taw19
Head to head
Mawlamyine vs Nay Pyi Taw at a glance
Nay Pyi Taw is ahead on 3 of 6 measures, and Mawlamyine on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Mawlamyine | Nay Pyi Taw | |
|---|---|---|
| Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better. | 9 (better) | 19 |
| PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³. | 1.5 (better) | 3.6 |
| Past week's averageUS AQI, 7 days. | 55 | 46 (better) |
| Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center. | 252 ha | 71 ha (better) |
| Tree coverWithin 1.2 mi (2 km) of the center. | 40.5% | 64.2% (better) |
| Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy. | 0 | 0 |
Air quality today
What is the air like in Mawlamyine and Nay Pyi Taw right now?
Mawlamyine has cleaner air than Nay Pyi Taw right now: AQI 9 (Good) against 19 (Good). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.
Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either.
MawlamyineNay Pyi Taw
Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).
Mawlamyine: Estimate · model corrected with 3 station cities within 115.0 mi (185 km), e.g. Yangon and Yangon. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, corrected with 3 ground-station cities within 185 km, US EPA index.
Nay Pyi Taw: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.
The past week
Which had cleaner air over the past 7 days?
But over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Nay Pyi Taw averaged AQI 46 against 55, and it was the cleaner of the two on 6 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.
- Cleaner days
- Mawlamyine1Nay Pyi Taw6
- Average AQI
- Mawlamyine55Nay Pyi Taw46
- Worst day, AQI
- Mawlamyine67Nay Pyi Taw63
The daily numbers (7 days)
| Day | Mawlamyine | Nay Pyi Taw |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | 62 | 50 |
| Nov 6 | 63 | 60 |
| Nov 7 | 67 | 63 |
| Nov 8 | 63 | 41 |
| Nov 9 | 55 | 40 |
| Nov 10 | 37 | 39 |
| Nov 11 | 37 | 27 |
Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.
What it means today
Is it safe to go outside in Mawlamyine and Nay Pyi Taw today?
Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Both are in the same EPA band today (Good), so the advice is the same.
Exercise outdoors
A good day to be active outside.
Windows
Open them to air the house.
Masks
Not needed.
Air purifier
Not needed.
Against everywhere else
How do Mawlamyine and Nay Pyi Taw compare with the rest of the world?
Right now Mawlamyine's air is cleaner than 97% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Nay Pyi Taw's is cleaner than 90%. Within Myanmar, that is 84% and 50% of its 33 measured places.
Cleaner air than…
- Mawlamyine
- Beats 97%
- Nay Pyi Taw
- Beats 90%
More tree cover than…
- Mawlamyine
- Beats 84%
- Nay Pyi Taw
- Beats 98%
Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which has lost more forest, Mawlamyine or Nay Pyi Taw?
Mawlamyine has lost more: about 252 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 71 ha around Nay Pyi Taw. 251 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.
Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.
Worst year: 2018, with 29 ha lost.
Worst year: 2006, with 15 ha lost.
| Mawlamyine | Nay Pyi Taw | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 252 ha | 71 ha (better) |
| Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000. | 23% | 15% (better) |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | 251 ha | 70 ha (better) |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Too little to call | Too little to call |
| Main known cause | Farms, pasture and plantations (59%) | Towns and roads (63%) |
Satellite timelapses
Watch both change, year by year
A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.
Mawlamyine
2017: satellite photo from February 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 7 km southeast of the city center.
Nay Pyi Taw
2017: satellite photo from February 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.
Trees
Which has more trees, Mawlamyine or Nay Pyi Taw?
Nay Pyi Taw has more tree cover: 64.2% of the land within 1.2 mi (2 km) of its center against 40.5% around Mawlamyine, or about 200,278 trees against 85,374.
The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.
| Mawlamyine | Nay Pyi Taw | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area. | 85.4K | 200K (better) |
| Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better. | 0 | 0 |
| CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing. | 1.9M kg | 4.4M kg (better) |
Tree cover on the satellite image
The same 1.2 mi (2 km) radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.
Reading these numbers
How this comparison is made
Air quality index
The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.
Trees and forest
Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 1.2 mi (2 km) of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
More on the method on the About Airleaf page.
Frequently asked
Mawlamyine vs Nay Pyi Taw: your questions answered
Is Mawlamyine cleaner than Nay Pyi Taw?
On air quality, yes, right now: Mawlamyine reads AQI 9 against 19, a gap of 10 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. But over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Nay Pyi Taw averaged AQI 46 against 55, and it was the cleaner of the two on 6 of those days.
Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Mawlamyine and Nay Pyi Taw today?
The advice is the same for both today. Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Mawlamyine reads AQI 9 and Nay Pyi Taw reads AQI 19.
Which has lost more forest, Mawlamyine or Nay Pyi Taw?
Mawlamyine has lost more: about 252 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 71 ha around Nay Pyi Taw. 251 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.
Which has more trees, Mawlamyine or Nay Pyi Taw?
Nay Pyi Taw has more tree cover: 64.2% of the land within 1.2 mi (2 km) of its center against 40.5% around Mawlamyine, or about 200,278 trees against 85,374. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.
How many more trees do Mawlamyine and Nay Pyi Taw need?
Mawlamyine needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Nay Pyi Taw about 0 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.
Are Mawlamyine and Nay Pyi Taw measured the same way?
The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.
How often does the Mawlamyine vs Nay Pyi Taw comparison update?
The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 13, 2026 and Sep 13, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.
Keep going
Compare them with somewhere else
Build your own
Compare Mawlamyine with somewhere else
This place
Mawlamyine