Air quality comparison · Myanmar, 392.1 mi (631 km) apart
Mandalay vs Mawlamyine Air quality index (AQI) today
Mawlamyine has cleaner air than Mandalay right now: AQI 9 (Good) against 37 (Good).
Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Mawlamyine averaged AQI 55 against 66, and it was the cleaner of the two on 5 of those days. Mawlamyine has lost more forest since 2001. Mawlamyine has more tree cover.
Myanmar
AQI 37
Good
Cleaner right now
- PM2.5
- 5.7 µg/m³
- Main pollutant
- PM2.5
- Source
- Model estimate
- Reading
- Nov 11, 05:30 local
Myanmar
AQI 9
Good
Cleaner right now
- PM2.5
- 1.5 µg/m³
- Main pollutant
- PM2.5
- Source
- Model estimate
- Reading
- Nov 11, 04:30 local
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
Mandalay37Mawlamyine9
Head to head
Mandalay vs Mawlamyine at a glance
Mawlamyine is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Mandalay on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.
| Mandalay | Mawlamyine | |
|---|---|---|
| Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better. | 37 | 9 (better) |
| PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³. | 5.7 | 1.5 (better) |
| Past week's averageUS AQI, 7 days. | 66 | 55 (better) |
| Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center. | 3 ha (better) | 252 ha |
| Tree coverWithin 1.2 mi (2 km) of the center. | 26.5% | 40.5% (better) |
| Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy. | 10.8K | 0 (better) |
Air quality today
What is the air like in Mandalay and Mawlamyine right now?
Mawlamyine has cleaner air than Mandalay right now: AQI 9 (Good) against 37 (Good). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.
Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either.
MandalayMawlamyine
Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).
Mandalay: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.
Mawlamyine: Estimate · model corrected with 3 station cities within 115.0 mi (185 km), e.g. Yangon and Yangon. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, corrected with 3 ground-station cities within 185 km, US EPA index.
The past week
Which had cleaner air over the past 7 days?
Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Mawlamyine averaged AQI 55 against 66, and it was the cleaner of the two on 5 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.
- Cleaner days
- Mandalay2Mawlamyine5
- Average AQI
- Mandalay66Mawlamyine55
- Worst day, AQI
- Mandalay95Mawlamyine67
The daily numbers (7 days)
| Day | Mandalay | Mawlamyine |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | 85 | 62 |
| Nov 6 | 95 | 63 |
| Nov 7 | 86 | 67 |
| Nov 8 | 59 | 63 |
| Nov 9 | 49 | 55 |
| Nov 10 | 39 | 37 |
| Nov 11 | 49 | 37 |
Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.
What it means today
Is it safe to go outside in Mandalay and Mawlamyine today?
Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Both are in the same EPA band today (Good), so the advice is the same.
Exercise outdoors
A good day to be active outside.
Windows
Open them to air the house.
Masks
Not needed.
Air purifier
Not needed.
Against everywhere else
How do Mandalay and Mawlamyine compare with the rest of the world?
Right now Mandalay's air is cleaner than 72% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Mawlamyine's is cleaner than 97%. Within Myanmar, that is 13% and 72% of its 33 measured places.
Cleaner air than…
- Mandalay
- Beats 72%
- Mawlamyine
- Beats 97%
More tree cover than…
- Mandalay
- Beats 61%
- Mawlamyine
- Beats 84%
Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.
Deforestation · 2001–2025
Which has lost more forest, Mandalay or Mawlamyine?
Mawlamyine has lost more: about 252 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 3 ha around Mandalay. 251 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.
Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.
Worst year: 2001, with 1 ha lost.
Worst year: 2018, with 29 ha lost.
| Mandalay | Mawlamyine | |
|---|---|---|
| Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged. | 3 ha (better) | 252 ha |
| Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns. | under 1 ha (better) | 251 ha |
| Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before. | Too little to call | Too little to call |
| Main known cause | Towns and roads (21%) | Farms, pasture and plantations (59%) |
Satellite timelapses
Watch both change, year by year
A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.
Mandalay
2017: satellite photo from February 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.
Mawlamyine
2017: satellite photo from February 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 7 km southeast of the city center.
Trees
Which has more trees, Mandalay or Mawlamyine?
Mawlamyine has more tree cover: 40.5% of the land within 1.2 mi (2 km) of its center against 26.5% around Mandalay, or about 85,374 trees against 82,003.
The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.
| Mandalay | Mawlamyine | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area. | 82.0K | 85.4K (better) |
| Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better. | 10.8K | 0 (better) |
| CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing. | 1.8M kg | 1.9M kg (better) |
Tree cover on the satellite image
The same 1.2 mi (2 km) radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.
Reading these numbers
How this comparison is made
Air quality index
The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.
Trees and forest
Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 1.2 mi (2 km) of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
More on the method on the About Airleaf page.
Frequently asked
Mandalay vs Mawlamyine: your questions answered
Is Mawlamyine cleaner than Mandalay?
On air quality, yes, right now: Mawlamyine reads AQI 9 against 37, a gap of 28 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Mawlamyine averaged AQI 55 against 66, and it was the cleaner of the two on 5 of those days.
Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Mandalay and Mawlamyine today?
The advice is the same for both today. Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Mandalay reads AQI 37 and Mawlamyine reads AQI 9.
Which has lost more forest, Mandalay or Mawlamyine?
Mawlamyine has lost more: about 252 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 3 ha around Mandalay. 251 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.
Which has more trees, Mandalay or Mawlamyine?
Mawlamyine has more tree cover: 40.5% of the land within 1.2 mi (2 km) of its center against 26.5% around Mandalay, or about 85,374 trees against 82,003. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.
How many more trees do Mandalay and Mawlamyine need?
Mandalay needs about 10,831 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Mawlamyine about 0 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.
Are Mandalay and Mawlamyine measured the same way?
The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.
How often does the Mandalay vs Mawlamyine comparison update?
The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 16, 2026 and Sep 13, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.
Keep going
Compare them with somewhere else
Build your own
Compare Mandalay with somewhere else
This place
Mandalay