Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Ethiopia, 398 km apart

Jijiga vs Nazrēt Air quality index (AQI) today

Nazrēt has cleaner air than Jijiga right now: AQI 36 (Good) against 78 (Moderate).

That puts them in different EPA bands, so the health advice differs today. Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Nazrēt averaged AQI 52 against 57, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. Nazrēt has more tree cover.

Jijiga

Ethiopia

AQI 78

Moderate

PM2.5
25 µg/m³1.7× WHO guideline
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 11, 02:00 local
Nazrēt

Ethiopia

AQI 36

Good

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
8 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 10, 20:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Jijiga vs Nazrēt at a glance

Nazrēt is ahead on 5 of 5 measures, and Jijiga on 0. The better figure in each row is marked.

Jijiga and Nazrēt compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
JijigaNazrēt
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.7836 (better)
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.258 (better)
Past week's averageUS AQI, 6 days.5752 (better)
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.2.5%13.6% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.86.4K51.5K (better)

Air quality today

What is the air like in Jijiga and Nazrēt right now?

Nazrēt has cleaner air than Jijiga right now: AQI 36 (Good) against 78 (Moderate). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Jijiga's PM2.5 is about 1.7× the WHO's 24-hour guideline of 15 µg/m³.

Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either.

JijigaNazrēt

25PM2.5, µg/m³8
26.1PM10, µg/m³9
9.9Nitrogen dioxide, µg/m³2.6
17Ozone, µg/m³50

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Jijiga: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

Nazrēt: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 6 days?

Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Nazrēt averaged AQI 52 against 57, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Jijiga2Nazrēt4
Average AQI
Jijiga57Nazrēt52
Worst day, AQI
Jijiga62Nazrēt63
JijigaNazrēt
50Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10
The daily numbers (6 days)
Daily air quality index for Jijiga and Nazrēt
DayJijigaNazrēt
Nov 55463
Nov 65052
Nov 75550
Nov 85752
Nov 96251
Nov 106243

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Jijiga and Nazrēt today?

Jijiga (AQI 78, Moderate): Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.

Nazrēt (AQI 36, Good): Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.

Exercise outdoors

Jijiga
Fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier.
Nazrēt
A good day to be active outside.

Windows

Jijiga
Fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution.
Nazrēt
Open them to air the house.

Masks

Jijiga
Not needed for most people.
Nazrēt
Not needed.

Air purifier

Jijiga
Worth running if you are sensitive.
Nazrēt
Not needed.

Against everywhere else

How do Jijiga and Nazrēt compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Jijiga's air is cleaner than 31% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Nazrēt's is cleaner than 73%. Within Ethiopia, that is 14% and 79% of its 30 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Jijiga
Beats 31%
Nazrēt
Beats 73%

More tree cover than…

Jijiga
Beats 5%
Nazrēt
Beats 31%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Jijiga

Satellite image of the area around Jijiga, January 2017

2017: satellite photo from January 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Nazrēt

Satellite image of the area around Nazrēt, February 2017

2017: satellite photo from February 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Jijiga or Nazrēt?

Nazrēt has more tree cover: 13.6% of the land within 2 km of its center against 2.5% around Jijiga, or about 42,726 trees against 7,854.

Jijiga2.5% of a 30% target
Nazrēt13.6% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Jijiga and Nazrēt
JijigaNazrēt
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.7.9K42.7K (better)
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.86.4K51.5K (better)
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.173K kg940K kg (better)

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Jijiga2.5% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 18, 2026
Nazrēt13.6% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 11, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Jijiga vs Nazrēt: your questions answered

Is Nazrēt cleaner than Jijiga?

On air quality, yes, right now: Nazrēt reads AQI 36 against 78, a gap of 42 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Nazrēt averaged AQI 52 against 57, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Jijiga and Nazrēt today?

In Jijiga, at AQI 78: Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. In Nazrēt, at AQI 36: Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.

Which has more trees, Jijiga or Nazrēt?

Nazrēt has more tree cover: 13.6% of the land within 2 km of its center against 2.5% around Jijiga, or about 42,726 trees against 7,854. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Jijiga and Nazrēt need?

Jijiga needs about 86,394 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Nazrēt about 51,522 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Jijiga and Nazrēt measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Jijiga vs Nazrēt comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Jijiga with somewhere else

This place

Jijiga