Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Canada, 25 km apart

Coquitlam vs Vancouver Air quality index (AQI) today

Coquitlam has cleaner air than Vancouver right now: AQI 19 (Good) against 24 (Good).

Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. But over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Vancouver averaged AQI 48 against 50, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. Coquitlam has lost more forest since 2001. Coquitlam has more tree cover.

Coquitlam

Canada

AQI 19

Good

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
3.4 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Ground station
Reading
Nov 11, 08:00 local
Vancouver

Canada

AQI 24

Good

PM2.5
3.8 µg/m³
Main pollutant
Ozone
Source
Ground station
Reading
Nov 11, 08:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Coquitlam vs Vancouver at a glance

Coquitlam is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and Vancouver on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Coquitlam and Vancouver compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
CoquitlamVancouver
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.19 (better)24
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.3.4 (better)3.8
Past week's averageUS AQI, 6 days.5048 (better)
Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center.1,200 ha272 ha (better)
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.42.1% (better)23.8%
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.0 (better)12.8K

Air quality today

What is the air like in Coquitlam and Vancouver right now?

Coquitlam has cleaner air than Vancouver right now: AQI 19 (Good) against 24 (Good). PM2.5 is setting the index in Coquitlam, and Ozone in Vancouver.

Both readings come from nearby ground stations.

CoquitlamVancouver

3.4PM2.5, µg/m³3.8
10PM10, µg/m³7
16.6Nitrogen dioxide, µg/m³27.2
15.7Ozone, µg/m³53

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Coquitlam: Ground station · Pitt Meadows, 6.9 km away · median of 3 stations. Data: OpenAQ · AirNow.

Vancouver: Ground station · Mahon Park, 5.3 km away · median of 4 stations. Data: OpenAQ · AirNow.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 6 days?

But over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Vancouver averaged AQI 48 against 50, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Coquitlam2Vancouver4
Average AQI
Coquitlam50Vancouver48
Worst day, AQI
Coquitlam59Vancouver60
CoquitlamVancouver
50Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10
The daily numbers (6 days)
Daily air quality index for Coquitlam and Vancouver
DayCoquitlamVancouver
Nov 55952
Nov 64240
Nov 74847
Nov 83944
Nov 95960
Nov 105244

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Coquitlam and Vancouver today?

Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Both are in the same EPA band today (Good), so the advice is the same.

Exercise outdoors

A good day to be active outside.

Windows

Open them to air the house.

Masks

Not needed.

Air purifier

Not needed.

Against everywhere else

How do Coquitlam and Vancouver compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Coquitlam's air is cleaner than 89% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Vancouver's is cleaner than 85%. Within Canada, that is 64% and 50% of its 59 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Coquitlam
Beats 89%
Vancouver
Beats 85%

More tree cover than…

Coquitlam
Beats 86%
Vancouver
Beats 55%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which has lost more forest, Coquitlam or Vancouver?

Coquitlam has lost more: about 1,200 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 272 ha around Vancouver. 1,030 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Coquitlam
20012025

Worst year: 2008, with 126 ha lost.

Vancouver
20012025

Worst year: 2006, with 26 ha lost.

Forest loss around Coquitlam and Vancouver, 2001 to 2025
CoquitlamVancouver
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.1,200 ha272 ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.7.2%3.7% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.1,030 ha249 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Too little to callToo little to call
Main known causeTowns and roads (60%)Towns and roads (91%)

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Coquitlam

Satellite image of the area around Coquitlam, July 2017

2017: satellite photo from July 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 4 km east of the city center.

Vancouver

Satellite image of the area around Vancouver, July 2017

2017: satellite photo from July 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Coquitlam or Vancouver?

Coquitlam has more tree cover: 42.1% of the land within 2 km of its center against 23.8% around Vancouver, or about 132,129 trees against 49,049.

Coquitlam42.1% of a 30% target
Vancouver23.8% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Coquitlam and Vancouver
CoquitlamVancouver
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.132K (better)49.0K
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.0 (better)12.8K
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.2.9M kg (better)1.1M kg

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Coquitlam42.1% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 11, 2026
Vancouver23.8% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 6, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Coquitlam vs Vancouver: your questions answered

Is Coquitlam cleaner than Vancouver?

On air quality, yes, right now: Coquitlam reads AQI 19 against 24, a gap of 5 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. But over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Vancouver averaged AQI 48 against 50, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Coquitlam and Vancouver today?

The advice is the same for both today. Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Coquitlam reads AQI 19 and Vancouver reads AQI 24.

Which has lost more forest, Coquitlam or Vancouver?

Coquitlam has lost more: about 1,200 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 272 ha around Vancouver. 1,030 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Which has more trees, Coquitlam or Vancouver?

Coquitlam has more tree cover: 42.1% of the land within 2 km of its center against 23.8% around Vancouver, or about 132,129 trees against 49,049. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Coquitlam and Vancouver need?

Coquitlam needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Vancouver about 12,777 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Why can two places 25 km apart read differently?

Air changes over short distances with traffic, industry, wind and hills, and each reading comes from the nearest ground stations or, where there are none, from a regional model. A gap of a few points between neighbors is within normal variation, while a gap that crosses an EPA band is worth noticing.

Are Coquitlam and Vancouver measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings come from nearby ground stations. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Coquitlam vs Vancouver comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 11, 2026 and Sep 6, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Coquitlam with somewhere else

This place

Coquitlam