Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Australia, 944 km apart

Brisbane vs Canberra Air quality index (AQI) today

Canberra has cleaner air than Brisbane right now: AQI 8 (Good) against 11 (Good).

Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Canberra averaged AQI 20 against 48, and it was the cleaner of the two on 7 of those days. Canberra has lost more forest since 2001. Canberra has more tree cover.

Brisbane

Australia

AQI 11

Good

PM2.5
2 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Ground station
Reading
Nov 12, 02:00 local
Canberra

Australia

AQI 8

Good

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
1.5 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Ground station
Reading
Nov 12, 03:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Brisbane vs Canberra at a glance

Canberra is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Brisbane on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

Brisbane and Canberra compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
BrisbaneCanberra
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.118 (better)
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.21.5 (better)
Past week's averageUS AQI, 7 days.4820 (better)
Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center.178 ha (better)1,290 ha
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.20.0%42.2% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.26.8K0 (better)

Air quality today

What is the air like in Brisbane and Canberra right now?

Canberra has cleaner air than Brisbane right now: AQI 8 (Good) against 11 (Good). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Both readings come from nearby ground stations.

BrisbaneCanberra

2PM2.5, µg/m³1.5

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Brisbane: Ground station · 99ElizabethSt, 3.4 km away · median of 2 stations. Data: OpenAQ · AirGradient, cardboardpig, EJ on M.

Canberra: Ground station · Wanniassa, 13.8 km away. Data: OpenAQ · AirGradient, Darkmyre.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 7 days?

Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Canberra averaged AQI 20 against 48, and it was the cleaner of the two on 7 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Brisbane0Canberra7
Average AQI
Brisbane48Canberra20
Worst day, AQI
Brisbane57Canberra33
BrisbaneCanberra
50Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10Nov 11
The daily numbers (7 days)
Daily air quality index for Brisbane and Canberra
DayBrisbaneCanberra
Nov 54613
Nov 64933
Nov 75716
Nov 85011
Nov 94015
Nov 105427
Nov 114226

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Brisbane and Canberra today?

Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Both are in the same EPA band today (Good), so the advice is the same.

Exercise outdoors

A good day to be active outside.

Windows

Open them to air the house.

Masks

Not needed.

Air purifier

Not needed.

Against everywhere else

How do Brisbane and Canberra compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Brisbane's air is cleaner than 95% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Canberra's is cleaner than 97%. Within Australia, that is 80% and 85% of its 21 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Brisbane
Beats 95%
Canberra
Beats 97%

More tree cover than…

Brisbane
Beats 47%
Canberra
Beats 86%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which has lost more forest, Brisbane or Canberra?

Canberra has lost more: about 1,290 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 178 ha around Brisbane. 1,000 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Brisbane
20012025

Worst year: 2007, with 33 ha lost.

Canberra
20012025

Worst year: 2003, with 599 ha lost.

Forest loss around Brisbane and Canberra, 2001 to 2025
BrisbaneCanberra
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.178 ha (better)1,290 ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.4.1% (better)39%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.163 ha (better)1,000 ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Too little to callToo little to call
Main known causeTowns and roads (92%)Towns and roads (42%)

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Brisbane

Satellite image of the area around Brisbane, August 2017

2017: satellite photo from August 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Canberra

Satellite image of the area around Canberra, January 2017

2017: satellite photo from January 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Brisbane or Canberra?

Canberra has more tree cover: 42.2% of the land within 2 km of its center against 20.0% around Brisbane, or about 106,988 trees against 53,658.

Brisbane20.0% of a 30% target
Canberra42.2% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Brisbane and Canberra
BrisbaneCanberra
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.53.7K107K (better)
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.26.8K0 (better)
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.1.2M kg2.4M kg (better)

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Brisbane20.0% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 26, 2026
Canberra42.2% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Mar 14, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Brisbane vs Canberra: your questions answered

Is Canberra cleaner than Brisbane?

On air quality, yes, right now: Canberra reads AQI 8 against 11, a gap of 3 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Canberra averaged AQI 20 against 48, and it was the cleaner of the two on 7 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Brisbane and Canberra today?

The advice is the same for both today. Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Brisbane reads AQI 11 and Canberra reads AQI 8.

Which has lost more forest, Brisbane or Canberra?

Canberra has lost more: about 1,290 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 178 ha around Brisbane. 1,000 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Which has more trees, Brisbane or Canberra?

Canberra has more tree cover: 42.2% of the land within 2 km of its center against 20.0% around Brisbane, or about 106,988 trees against 53,658. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Brisbane and Canberra need?

Brisbane needs about 26,829 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Canberra about 0 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Brisbane and Canberra measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings come from nearby ground stations. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Brisbane vs Canberra comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 26, 2026 and Mar 14, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Brisbane with somewhere else

This place

Brisbane