Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Iraq, 722 km apart

Basrah vs Erbil Air quality index (AQI) today

Basrah has cleaner air than Erbil right now: AQI 53 (Moderate) against 57 (Moderate).

Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. But over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Erbil averaged AQI 57 against 152, and it was the cleaner of the two on 6 of those days. Erbil has more tree cover.

Basrah

Iraq

AQI 53

Moderate

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
8.9 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 11, 02:00 local
Erbil

Iraq

AQI 57

Moderate

PM2.5
11.5 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 10, 16:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Basrah vs Erbil at a glance

Erbil is ahead on 3 of 5 measures, and Basrah on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Basrah and Erbil compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
BasrahErbil
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.53 (better)57
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.8.9 (better)11.5
Past week's averageUS AQI, 6 days.15257 (better)
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.0.1%5.0% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.93.9K78.5K (better)

Air quality today

What is the air like in Basrah and Erbil right now?

Basrah has cleaner air than Erbil right now: AQI 53 (Moderate) against 57 (Moderate). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either.

BasrahErbil

8.9PM2.5, µg/m³11.5
130.9PM10, µg/m³5.5
13.2Nitrogen dioxide, µg/m³17.5
45Ozone, µg/m³76

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Basrah: Estimate · model corrected with 3 station cities within 145 km, e.g. Kuwait City and Al Jahra. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, corrected with 3 ground-station cities within 145 km, US EPA index.

Erbil: Estimate · model corrected with 2 station cities within 185 km, e.g. Sulaymaniyah and Silopi. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, corrected with 2 ground-station cities within 185 km, US EPA index.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 6 days?

But over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Erbil averaged AQI 57 against 152, and it was the cleaner of the two on 6 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Basrah0Erbil6
Average AQI
Basrah152Erbil57
Worst day, AQI
Basrah229Erbil76
BasrahErbil
50100150200Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10
The daily numbers (6 days)
Daily air quality index for Basrah and Erbil
DayBasrahErbil
Nov 514676
Nov 614766
Nov 722956
Nov 813853
Nov 910348
Nov 1014743

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Basrah and Erbil today?

Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. Both are in the same EPA band today (Moderate), so the advice is the same.

Exercise outdoors

Fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier.

Windows

Fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution.

Masks

Not needed for most people.

Air purifier

Worth running if you are sensitive.

Against everywhere else

How do Basrah and Erbil compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Basrah's air is cleaner than 56% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Erbil's is cleaner than 51%. Within Iraq, that is 81% and 71% of its 49 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Basrah
Beats 56%
Erbil
Beats 51%

More tree cover than…

Basrah
Beats 0%
Erbil
Beats 10%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Basrah

Satellite image of the area around Basrah, August 2017

2017: satellite photo from August 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Erbil

Satellite image of the area around Erbil, July 2017

2017: satellite photo from July 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Basrah or Erbil?

Erbil has more tree cover: 5.0% of the land within 2 km of its center against 0.1% around Basrah, or about 15,708 trees against 314.

Basrah0.1% of a 30% target
Erbil5.0% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Basrah and Erbil
BasrahErbil
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.31415.7K (better)
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.93.9K78.5K (better)
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.6.9K kg346K kg (better)

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Basrah0.1% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 16, 2026
Erbil5.0% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 17, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Basrah vs Erbil: your questions answered

Is Basrah cleaner than Erbil?

On air quality, yes, right now: Basrah reads AQI 53 against 57, a gap of 4 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. But over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, Erbil averaged AQI 57 against 152, and it was the cleaner of the two on 6 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Basrah and Erbil today?

The advice is the same for both today. Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. Basrah reads AQI 53 and Erbil reads AQI 57.

Which has more trees, Basrah or Erbil?

Erbil has more tree cover: 5.0% of the land within 2 km of its center against 0.1% around Basrah, or about 15,708 trees against 314. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Basrah and Erbil need?

Basrah needs about 93,934 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Erbil about 78,540 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Basrah and Erbil measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Basrah vs Erbil comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 16, 2026 and Sep 17, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Basrah with somewhere else

This place

Basrah