Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Kazakhstan, 1006 km apart

Aktobe vs Astana Air quality index (AQI) today

Aktobe has cleaner air than Astana right now: AQI 13 (Good) against 44 (Good).

Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Aktobe averaged AQI 44 against 52, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. Astana has lost more forest since 2001. Astana has more tree cover.

Aktobe

Kazakhstan

AQI 13

Good

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
1.4 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 11, 14:00 local
Astana

Kazakhstan

AQI 44

Good

PM2.5
7.1 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 11, 15:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Aktobe vs Astana at a glance

Aktobe is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and Astana on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.

Aktobe and Astana compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
AktobeAstana
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.13 (better)44
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.1.4 (better)7.1
Past week's averageUS AQI, 7 days.44 (better)52
Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center.under 1 ha (better)5 ha
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.9.1%17.3% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.65.5K39.8K (better)

Air quality today

What is the air like in Aktobe and Astana right now?

Aktobe has cleaner air than Astana right now: AQI 13 (Good) against 44 (Good). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either.

AktobeAstana

1.4PM2.5, µg/m³7.1
1.5PM10, µg/m³7.8
4.2Nitrogen dioxide, µg/m³13.5
25Ozone, µg/m³44

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Aktobe: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

Astana: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 7 days?

Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Aktobe averaged AQI 44 against 52, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Aktobe4Astana3
Average AQI
Aktobe44Astana52
Worst day, AQI
Aktobe66Astana83
AktobeAstana
50Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10Nov 11
The daily numbers (7 days)
Daily air quality index for Aktobe and Astana
DayAktobeAstana
Nov 55246
Nov 62142
Nov 73854
Nov 86683
Nov 94633
Nov 104133
Nov 114271

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Aktobe and Astana today?

Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Both are in the same EPA band today (Good), so the advice is the same.

Exercise outdoors

A good day to be active outside.

Windows

Open them to air the house.

Masks

Not needed.

Air purifier

Not needed.

Against everywhere else

How do Aktobe and Astana compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Aktobe's air is cleaner than 94% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Astana's is cleaner than 66%. Within Kazakhstan, that is 59% and 18% of its 23 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Aktobe
Beats 94%
Astana
Beats 66%

More tree cover than…

Aktobe
Beats 19%
Astana
Beats 40%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which has lost more forest, Aktobe or Astana?

Astana has lost more: about 5 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against under 1 ha around Aktobe. 4 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Aktobe
20012025

Worst year: 2009, with under 1 ha lost.

Astana
20012025

Worst year: 2012, with 3 ha lost.

Forest loss around Aktobe and Astana, 2001 to 2025
AktobeAstana
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.under 1 ha (better)5 ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.under 1% (better)2.6%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.under 1 ha (better)4 ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Too little to callToo little to call
Main known causeNot classifiedTowns and roads (68%)

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Aktobe

Satellite image of the area around Aktobe, August 2017

2017: satellite photo from August 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Astana

Satellite image of the area around Astana, September 2017

2017: satellite photo from September 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Aktobe or Astana?

Astana has more tree cover: 17.3% of the land within 2 km of its center against 9.1% around Aktobe, or about 54,241 trees against 28,531.

Aktobe9.1% of a 30% target
Astana17.3% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Aktobe and Astana
AktobeAstana
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.28.5K54.2K (better)
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.65.5K39.8K (better)
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.628K kg1.2M kg (better)

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Aktobe9.1% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 18, 2026
Astana17.3% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 8, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Aktobe vs Astana: your questions answered

Is Aktobe cleaner than Astana?

On air quality, yes, right now: Aktobe reads AQI 13 against 44, a gap of 31 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Aktobe averaged AQI 44 against 52, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Aktobe and Astana today?

The advice is the same for both today. Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Aktobe reads AQI 13 and Astana reads AQI 44.

Which has lost more forest, Aktobe or Astana?

Astana has lost more: about 5 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against under 1 ha around Aktobe. 4 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Which has more trees, Aktobe or Astana?

Astana has more tree cover: 17.3% of the land within 2 km of its center against 9.1% around Aktobe, or about 54,241 trees against 28,531. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Aktobe and Astana need?

Aktobe needs about 65,528 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Astana about 39,818 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Aktobe and Astana measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Aktobe vs Astana comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 8, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Aktobe with somewhere else

This place

Aktobe