City report · Gauteng, South Africa
Vanderbijlpark Air quality today
Air quality in Vanderbijlpark currently reads AQI 71 (Moderate): Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.
AQI 71
Air quality right now
Moderate
- PM2.5, fine particles (µg/m³)
- 19.8
- tree cover
- 21.9%
- trees in this area
- 68.8K
- more trees needed
- 25.4K
Measured across a 2 km radius around Vanderbijlpark S. E. 1, Vanderbijlpark, 1911, South Africa (12.57 km²), from a satellite image of Sep 22, 2026. Lower AQI is better: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous.
Vanderbijlpark · AQI 71 (Moderate)
Vanderbijlpark's tree count comes to 68,801 trees across 12.57 km², 8 points below the 30% tree-cover level considered healthy for this area, so roughly 25,447 more trees would close the gap.
Air quality detail
Air quality in Vanderbijlpark today: AQI 71, Moderate
Main pollutant: PM2.5 · Observed Nov 11, 19:00 local time via OpenAQ ground stations, US EPA index. Values in µg/m³.
Ground station · Sebokeng, 13.8 km away · median of 3 stations
Health signal
Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.
PM2.5
19.8
PM10
54.7
NO₂
39.1
O₃
73.5
SO₂
27.4
CO
137.5
Data: OpenAQ · South Africa, South African Air Quality Information System (SAAQIS)
- Outdoor exercise
- Fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier
- Windows
- Fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution
- Mask
- Not needed for most people
- Air purifier
- Worth running if you are sensitive
Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Vanderbijlpark's daily AQI at 74 on average, from 45 on Nov 9 to an hourly peak of 153 on Nov 11.
Where Vanderbijlpark stands: the most polluted cities in the world right now · the cleanest
Tree cover detail
Tree cover in Vanderbijlpark: Below target
21.9% tree cover against a 30% healthy-neighborhood target, across 12.57 km².
Trees in this area
68,801
Target trees
94,248
More trees needed
25,447
CO₂ if planted / yr
559.8 t
Deforestation · 2001–2025
How much forest has Vanderbijlpark lost?
There was very little forest around Vanderbijlpark in 2000, about 18 hectares, and about 3 hectares of it has been lost since. Only fairly dense woodland counts as forest in these maps, so scattered street and garden trees don't show up here.
2017: satellite photo from July 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.
The worst year was 2003, when about 1 hectare of forest were lost.
Hectares of forest lost each year
Show the figures as a table
| Year | Cleared for good | Can grow back | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2002 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2003 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | 1 ha |
| 2004 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2005 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2006 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2007 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2008 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2009 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2010 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2011 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2012 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2013 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2014 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2015 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2016 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2017 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2018 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2019 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2020 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2021 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2022 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2023 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2024 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2025 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
What is causing deforestation around Vanderbijlpark?
- Towns and roadscleared for good48% · 1 ha
- Farms, pasture and plantationscleared for good8% · under 1 ha
- Unknown causescause unknown44% · 1 ha
Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.
Forest gained and lost, 2000–2020
- Forest in 2000
- 430 ha
- Forest in 2020
- 459 ha
- Overall change
- +29 hamore forest than in 2000
Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Vanderbijlpark grew from about 430 hectares to 459 hectares, a net gain of about 29 hectares (+6.7%). New forest grew on about 42 hectares, while 13 hectares were lost.
These 2000 and 2020 maps, from the University of Maryland, count any land with trees taller than 5 m as forest, including plantations and orchards. Forest that was cut or burned and had grown back by 2020 counts in both years, so the loss here is smaller than the yearly figures.
These figures cover everything within 10 km of the city center, a wider area than the report above, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.
Source: Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA, Global Forest Change (GFC-2025-v1.13); causes: WRI/Google DeepMind drivers of forest loss; both CC BY 4.0, summed by Airleaf for each area. Forest gained and lost 2000–2020: Potapov et al. 2022, UMD GLAD Global Land Cover and Land Use Change, CC BY 4.0. Images: contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data. How it's measured
In the same region
Measured cities near Vanderbijlpark
Same 2 km radius, same index — so they compare directly.
- Evaton19.9 km
South Africa
- Tree cover
- 3%
- Air quality
- 133
- Westonaria47.5 km
South Africa
- Tree cover
- 9%
- Air quality
- 38
- Tokoza48.7 km
South Africa
- Tree cover
- 7%
- Air quality
- 78
- Soweto49.4 km
South Africa
- Tree cover
- 6%
- Air quality
- 37
- Carletonville58.6 km
South Africa
- Tree cover
- 23%
- Air quality
- 31
- Randfontein60.2 km
South Africa
- Tree cover
- 14%
- Air quality
- 47
Build your own
Compare Vanderbijlpark with anywhere
This place
Vanderbijlpark
Use this data
Put Vanderbijlpark's numbers on your site
Free to embed. Updates itself as the measurement refreshes.
Frequently asked
Questions about Vanderbijlpark
What is the air quality (AQI) in Vanderbijlpark right now?
The latest reading for Vanderbijlpark shows an AQI of 71 (Moderate), measured Nov 11, 19:00 local time by 3 ground monitoring stations via OpenAQ (the median of their readings; the nearest is Sebokeng, 13.8 km away). The main pollutant is PM2.5. Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.
Is it safe to exercise outside in Vanderbijlpark today?
At AQI 71 (Moderate): fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier. Windows: fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution. Masks: not needed for most people. The reading changes through the day, so check again before a long run or ride.
What has the air quality in Vanderbijlpark been like this week?
Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Vanderbijlpark's daily AQI at 74 on average, from 45 on Nov 9 to an hourly peak of 153 on Nov 11. On 1 of those days the average was above 100, unhealthy for sensitive groups.
How much forest has the area around Vanderbijlpark lost since 2001?
There was very little forest around Vanderbijlpark in 2000, about 18 hectares, and about 3 hectares of it has been lost since. Only fairly dense woodland counts as forest in these maps, so scattered street and garden trees don't show up here. Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Vanderbijlpark grew from about 430 hectares to 459 hectares, a net gain of about 29 hectares (+6.7%). New forest grew on about 42 hectares, while 13 hectares were lost.
What is the tree count in Vanderbijlpark?
Vanderbijlpark has an estimated 68,801 trees across the 12.57 km² measured — 21.9% tree cover, 8 percentage points short of the 30% tree-cover target set for this area.
How many more trees does Vanderbijlpark need?
Vanderbijlpark needs roughly 25,447 more trees to close a 8-point shortfall against its 30% tree-cover target — about 559.8 t of extra CO₂ absorbed per year once grown.
How are Vanderbijlpark's air quality and tree cover measured?
Air quality is measured by ground monitoring stations near Vanderbijlpark S. E. 1, via OpenAQ; the 7-day trend is the Open-Meteo / CAMS model's estimate. Tree cover is measured from Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search satellite imagery at 10 m detail across a 2 km radius around Vanderbijlpark S. E. 1; the tree count is an estimate derived from that cover.
See your own area
What does your neighborhood look like?
Pick any point and radius to get the same air-quality and tree-cover breakdown.
Check my address