Skip to content
Airleaf
Air quality now: Namangan

Uzbekistan · Namangan · 2 cities

Air quality in Namangan today The AQI right now, city by city

Right now, Namangan has the cleanest air of the 2 cities we track in Namangan (AQI 49, Good), and Chust the worst (AQI 54, Moderate). Chust has the most tree cover, at 13.5% — #3 of 20 cities measured in Uzbekistan.

Every city is measured the same way, over the same 2 km around its center: the air quality right now, from ground stations where there are any, and its tree cover.

cities tracked
2
average tree cover
9.3%
Uzbekistan: 9.3%
worst air now: Chust
54
cleanest air now: Namangan
49

Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf, refreshed hourly.

Air quality today across Namangan, city by city

Current air quality and tree cover for cities in Namangan, Uzbekistan
Namangan49Good5.2%77.8K#15 of 20
Chust54Moderate13.5%51.8K#3 of 20

Air quality is the US AQI from ground monitoring stations via OpenAQ where available, otherwise the Open-Meteo / CAMS model, refreshed hourly. Tree cover is measured within 2 km of each city center from Sentinel-2 imagery; the rank compares every city measured in Uzbekistan.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

How much forest has Namangan lost?

Since 2001, Namangan has lost about 11 hectares of forest (about 15 football pitches): 3.4% of the forest it had in 2000. The biggest cause was farms, pasture and plantations (25%). About 3 hectares (28%) was deforestation: forest cleared for good for farms, mines or towns.

Forest lost since 2001
11 haabout 15 football pitches
Share of its forest
3.4%of what there was in 2000
Cleared for good
3 hadeforestation: turned into farms, mines or towns
Forest lost each year in Namangan, 2001–2025

Hectares of forest lost each year

Forest lost each year in Namangan, 2001–2025. Use the left and right arrow keys to read each year.2

Show the figures as a table
Forest lost each year in Namangan, 2001–2025
YearCleared for goodCan grow backTotal
2001under 1 ha2 ha2 ha
20021 haunder 1 ha2 ha
2003under 1 haunder 1 ha1 ha
2004under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2005under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2006under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2007under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2008under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2009under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2010under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2011under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2012under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2013under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2014under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2015under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2016under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2017under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2018under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2019under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2020under 1 haunder 1 ha1 ha
2021under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2022under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2023under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2024under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2025under 1 ha1 ha1 ha

The worst year was 2001, when about 2 hectares of forest were lost.

What is causing deforestation in Namangan?

  • Farms, pasture and plantationscleared for good25% · 3 ha
  • Storms, floods and other natural causescan grow back15% · 2 ha
  • Wildfirescan grow back10% · 1 ha

Also: towns and roads, unknown causes.

Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.

Source: Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA, Global Forest Change (GFC-2025-v1.13); causes: WRI/Google DeepMind drivers of forest loss; both CC BY 4.0, summed by Airleaf for each area. How it's measured

Other regions in Uzbekistan

Clean-air buying guides

Cleaner air at home in Namangan

Picked by tested clean-air delivery rate (CADR), noise and running cost, from independent test labels. No brand pays to be listed.

All buying guides

Your own street

Check any address in Namangan, not just the big cities.

Open the map