City report · Kyrgyzstan
Osh Air quality today
Air quality in Osh currently reads AQI 11 (Good): Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.
Air quality right now
AQI 11
Good
- PM2.5, fine particles (µg/m³)
- 1.9
- tree cover
- 11.6%
- trees in this area
- 36.4K
- more trees needed
- 57.8K
Measured across a 2 km radius around Osh, Kyrgyzstan (12.57 km²), from a satellite image of Sep 19, 2026. Lower AQI is better: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous.
Osh · AQI 11 (Good)
Osh's tree count comes to 36,442 trees across 12.57 km², 18 points below the 30% tree-cover level considered healthy for this area, so roughly 57,805 more trees would close the gap.
Air quality detail
Air quality in Osh today: AQI 11, Good
Main pollutant: PM2.5 · Observed Nov 11, 15:00 local time via Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index. Values in µg/m³.
Model estimate · no ground station nearby
Health signal
Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.
PM2.5
1.9
PM10
2.4
NO₂
2.1
O₃
74.0
SO₂
5.6
CO
156.0
- Outdoor exercise
- A good day to be active outside
- Windows
- Open them to air the house
- Mask
- Not needed
- Air purifier
- Not needed
Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Osh's daily AQI at 59 on average, from 24 on Nov 11 to an hourly peak of 109 on Nov 5.
Where Osh stands: the most polluted cities in the world right now · the cleanest
Tree cover detail
Tree cover in Osh: Critically low
11.6% tree cover against a 30% healthy-neighborhood target, across 12.57 km².
Trees in this area
36,442
Target trees
94,247
More trees needed
57,805
CO₂ if planted / yr
1,272 t
Deforestation · 2001–2025
How much forest has Osh lost?
There was very little forest around Osh in 2000, about 19 hectares, and about 2 hectares of it has been lost since. Only fairly dense woodland counts as forest in these maps, so scattered street and garden trees don't show up here.
2017: satellite photo from June 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.
Hectares of forest lost each year
Show the figures as a table
| Year | Cleared for good | Can grow back | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2002 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2003 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2004 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2005 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2006 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2007 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2008 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2009 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2010 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2011 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2012 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2013 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2014 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2015 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2016 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2017 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2018 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2019 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2020 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2021 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2022 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2023 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2024 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
| 2025 | under 1 ha | under 1 ha | under 1 ha |
What is causing deforestation around Osh?
- Towns and roadscleared for good60% · under 1 ha
- Unknown causescause unknown40% · under 1 ha
Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.
Forest gained and lost, 2000–2020
- Forest in 2000
- 370 ha
- Forest in 2020
- 589 ha
- Overall change
- +219 hamore forest than in 2000
Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Osh grew from about 370 hectares to 589 hectares, a net gain of about 219 hectares (+59%). New forest grew on about 220 hectares, while under 1 hectare was lost.
These 2000 and 2020 maps, from the University of Maryland, count any land with trees taller than 5 m as forest, including plantations and orchards. Forest that was cut or burned and had grown back by 2020 counts in both years, so the loss here is smaller than the yearly figures.
These figures cover everything within 10 km of the city center, a wider area than the report above, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.
Source: Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA, Global Forest Change (GFC-2025-v1.13); causes: WRI/Google DeepMind drivers of forest loss; both CC BY 4.0, summed by Airleaf for each area. Forest gained and lost 2000–2020: Potapov et al. 2022, UMD GLAD Global Land Cover and Land Use Change, CC BY 4.0. Images: contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data. How it's measured
In the same region
Measured cities near Osh
Same 2 km radius, same index — so they compare directly.
- Andijon47.2 km
Uzbekistan
- Tree cover
- 5%
- Air quality
- 103
- Fergana87.3 km
Uzbekistan
- Tree cover
- 11%
- Air quality
- 21
- Marg‘ilon91.0 km
Uzbekistan
- Tree cover
- 4%
- Air quality
- 21
- Namangan108.3 km
Uzbekistan
- Tree cover
- 5%
- Air quality
- 49
- Chust141.6 km
Uzbekistan
- Tree cover
- 14%
- Air quality
- 54
Also compared:Osh vs Bishkek
Build your own
Compare Osh with anywhere
This place
Osh
Use this data
Put Osh's numbers on your site
Free to embed. Updates itself as the measurement refreshes.
Frequently asked
Questions about Osh
What is the air quality (AQI) in Osh right now?
The latest reading for Osh shows an AQI of 11 (Good), observed Nov 11, 15:00 local time via Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index. The main pollutant is PM2.5. Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.
Is it safe to exercise outside in Osh today?
At AQI 11 (Good): a good day to be active outside. Windows: open them to air the house. Masks: not needed. The reading changes through the day, so check again before a long run or ride.
What has the air quality in Osh been like this week?
Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Osh's daily AQI at 59 on average, from 24 on Nov 11 to an hourly peak of 109 on Nov 5. No day averaged above 100, the level where the air turns unhealthy for sensitive groups.
How much forest has the area around Osh lost since 2001?
There was very little forest around Osh in 2000, about 19 hectares, and about 2 hectares of it has been lost since. Only fairly dense woodland counts as forest in these maps, so scattered street and garden trees don't show up here. Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Osh grew from about 370 hectares to 589 hectares, a net gain of about 219 hectares (+59%). New forest grew on about 220 hectares, while under 1 hectare was lost.
What is the tree count in Osh?
Osh has an estimated 36,442 trees across the 12.57 km² measured — 11.6% tree cover, 18 percentage points short of the 30% tree-cover target set for this area.
How many more trees does Osh need?
Osh needs roughly 57,805 more trees to close a 18-point shortfall against its 30% tree-cover target — about 1,272 t of extra CO₂ absorbed per year once grown.
How are Osh's air quality and tree cover measured?
Air quality comes from ground monitoring stations via OpenAQ where one reports nearby, and otherwise, as here, from the Open-Meteo / CAMS model, which may differ from street-level monitors. Tree cover is measured from Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search satellite imagery at 10 m detail across a 2 km radius around Osh; the tree count is an estimate derived from that cover.
See your own area
What does your neighborhood look like?
Pick any point and radius to get the same air-quality and tree-cover breakdown.
Check my address