Skip to content
Airleaf

City report · Hainan, China

Nada Air quality today

Air quality in Nada currently reads AQI 77 (Moderate): Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.

AQI 77

Air quality right now

Moderate

Main pollutant: PM2.5
PM2.5, fine particles (µg/m³)
23.0
tree cover
28.0%
trees in this area
88.0K
more trees needed
6.3K

Measured across a 2 km radius around Danzhou, Hainan, China (12.57 km²), from a satellite image of Jun 22, 2026. Lower AQI is better: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous.

Dark green marks tree cover detected inside the study radius.Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, captured Jun 22, 2026

Nada's tree count comes to 87,965 trees across 12.57 km², 2 points below the 30% tree-cover level considered healthy for this area, so roughly 6,283 more trees would close the gap.

Air quality detail

Air quality in Nada today: AQI 77, Moderate

Main pollutant: PM2.5 · Observed Nov 12, 01:00 local time via World Air Quality Index Project ground stations, US EPA index. Values in µg/m³.

Ground station · Danzhou (儋州), 200 m away · median of 2 stations

Health signal

Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.

PM2.5

23.0

PM10

38.9

NO₂

—

O₃

—

SO₂

—

CO

—

Data: World Air Quality Index Project, Hainan Environmental Protection Agency (海南省国土环境资源厅)

Outdoor exercise
Fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier
Windows
Fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution
Mask
Not needed for most people
Air purifier
Worth running if you are sensitive

Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Nada's daily AQI at 50 on average, from 35 on Nov 8 to an hourly peak of 74 on Nov 10.

Last 7 days · model estimateavg 50 · peak 74
Nov 5: AQI 47 (peak 56)Nov 6: AQI 45 (peak 51)Nov 7: AQI 43 (peak 55)Nov 8: AQI 35 (peak 49)Nov 9: AQI 42 (peak 69)Nov 10: AQI 69 (peak 74)Nov 11: AQI 66 (peak 67)
Nov 5Nov 11

Where Nada stands: the most polluted cities in the world right now · the cleanest

Tree cover detail

Tree cover in Nada: Below target

28.0% tree cover against a 30% healthy-neighborhood target, across 12.57 km².

2 points below target

Trees in this area

87,965

Target trees

94,248

More trees needed

6,283

CO₂ if planted / yr

138.2 t

Deforestation · 2001–2025

How much forest has Nada lost?

Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Nada has lost about 5,050 hectares of forest (about 7,100 football pitches): 30% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it (94%) was deforestation, forest cleared for good, mainly for farms, pasture and plantations.

Satellite image of the area around Nada, April 2017

2017: satellite photo from April 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 7 km west of the city center.

Forest lost since 2001
5,050 haabout 7,100 football pitches
Share of its forest
30%of what there was in 2000
Cleared for good
4,760 hadeforestation: turned into farms, mines or towns

Forest loss is slowing down: about 220 hectares a year in 2021–2025, down from 299 hectares a year in 2016–2020. The worst year was 2016, when about 523 hectares of forest were lost.

Forest lost each year around Nada, 2001–2025

Hectares of forest lost each year

Forest lost each year around Nada, 2001–2025. Use the left and right arrow keys to read each year.523

Show the figures as a table
Forest lost each year around Nada, 2001–2025
YearCleared for goodCan grow backTotal
2001167 ha5 ha172 ha
200272 haunder 1 ha73 ha
2003100 ha3 ha103 ha
2004244 ha31 ha275 ha
2005119 ha14 ha133 ha
2006126 ha7 ha133 ha
2007101 ha5 ha106 ha
2008147 ha9 ha156 ha
2009133 ha13 ha146 ha
2010191 ha17 ha208 ha
2011425 ha37 ha462 ha
2012165 ha8 ha173 ha
201362 ha1 ha63 ha
201496 ha1 ha97 ha
2015142 ha11 ha153 ha
2016510 ha13 ha523 ha
2017359 ha22 ha381 ha
2018274 ha10 ha284 ha
2019165 ha1 ha166 ha
2020127 ha14 ha141 ha
2021192 ha25 ha217 ha
2022119 ha5 ha124 ha
2023118 ha15 ha133 ha
2024244 ha4 ha248 ha
2025361 ha15 ha376 ha

What is causing deforestation around Nada?

  • Farms, pasture and plantationscleared for good83% · 4,200 ha
  • Towns and roadscleared for good11% · 559 ha
  • Loggingcan grow back5.7% · 288 ha

Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.

Forest gained and lost, 2000–2020

Forest in 2000
23,000 ha
Forest in 2020
23,600 ha
Overall change
+638 hamore forest than in 2000

Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Nada grew from about 23,000 hectares to 23,600 hectares, a net gain of about 638 hectares (+2.8%). New forest grew on about 2,110 hectares, while 1,470 hectares were lost.

These 2000 and 2020 maps, from the University of Maryland, count any land with trees taller than 5 m as forest, including plantations and orchards. Forest that was cut or burned and had grown back by 2020 counts in both years, so the loss here is smaller than the yearly figures.

These figures cover everything within 10 km of the city center, a wider area than the report above, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Source: Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA, Global Forest Change (GFC-2025-v1.13); causes: WRI/Google DeepMind drivers of forest loss; both CC BY 4.0, summed by Airleaf for each area. Forest gained and lost 2000–2020: Potapov et al. 2022, UMD GLAD Global Land Cover and Land Use Change, CC BY 4.0. Images: contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data. How it's measured

In the same region

Measured cities near Nada

Same 2 km radius, same index — so they compare directly.

  • 82.6 km
    Tree cover
    70%
    Air quality
    51
  • 97.9 km
    Tree cover
    34%
    Air quality
    79
  • Haikou

    China

    98.5 km
    Tree cover
    23%
    Air quality
    69
  • Basuo

    China

    106.6 km
    Tree cover
    21%
    Air quality
    61
  • Wanning

    China

    116.6 km
    Tree cover
    35%
    Air quality
    69
  • 128.3 km
    Tree cover
    65%
    Air quality
    64

Build your own

Compare Nada with anywhere

This place

Nada

Use this data

Put Nada's numbers on your site

Free to embed. Updates itself as the measurement refreshes.

Nada air quality (AQI) and tree cover — measured by Airleaf
HTML
Markdown

Frequently asked

Questions about Nada

What is the air quality (AQI) in Nada right now?

The latest reading for Nada shows an AQI of 77 (Moderate), measured Nov 12, 01:00 local time by 2 ground monitoring stations via OpenAQ (the median of their readings; the nearest is Danzhou (儋州), 200 m away). The main pollutant is PM2.5. Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.

Is it safe to exercise outside in Nada today?

At AQI 77 (Moderate): fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier. Windows: fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution. Masks: not needed for most people. The reading changes through the day, so check again before a long run or ride.

What has the air quality in Nada been like this week?

Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Nada's daily AQI at 50 on average, from 35 on Nov 8 to an hourly peak of 74 on Nov 10. No day averaged above 100, the level where the air turns unhealthy for sensitive groups.

How much forest has the area around Nada lost since 2001?

Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Nada has lost about 5,050 hectares of forest (about 7,100 football pitches): 30% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it (94%) was deforestation, forest cleared for good, mainly for farms, pasture and plantations. Forest loss is slowing down: about 220 hectares a year in 2021–2025, down from 299 hectares a year in 2016–2020. Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Nada grew from about 23,000 hectares to 23,600 hectares, a net gain of about 638 hectares (+2.8%). New forest grew on about 2,110 hectares, while 1,470 hectares were lost.

What is the tree count in Nada?

Nada has an estimated 87,965 trees across the 12.57 km² measured — 28.0% tree cover, 2 percentage points short of the 30% tree-cover target set for this area.

How many more trees does Nada need?

Nada needs roughly 6,283 more trees to close a 2-point shortfall against its 30% tree-cover target — about 138.2 t of extra CO₂ absorbed per year once grown.

How are Nada's air quality and tree cover measured?

Air quality is measured by ground monitoring stations near Danzhou, via OpenAQ; the 7-day trend is the Open-Meteo / CAMS model's estimate. Tree cover is measured from Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search satellite imagery at 10 m detail across a 2 km radius around Danzhou; the tree count is an estimate derived from that cover.

See your own area

What does your neighborhood look like?

Pick any point and radius to get the same air-quality and tree-cover breakdown.

Check my address