City report · Shan State, Myanmar
Mu-se Air quality today
Air quality in Mu-se currently reads AQI 69 (Moderate): Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.
Air quality right now
AQI 69
Moderate
- PM2.5, fine particles (µg/m³)
- 19.9
- tree cover
- 18.2%
- trees in this area
- 55.6K
- more trees needed
- 36.0K
Measured across a 1.2 mi (2 km) radius around Muse, Myanmar (Burma) (4.9 sq mi), from a satellite image of Sep 15, 2026. Lower AQI is better: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous.
Mu-se · AQI 69 (Moderate)
Mu-se's tree count comes to 55,576 trees across 4.7 sq mi (12.22 km²) of land, 12 points below the 30% tree-cover level considered healthy for this area, so roughly 36,033 more trees would close the gap.
Air quality detail
Air quality in Mu-se today: AQI 69, Moderate
Main pollutant: PM2.5 · Observed Nov 10, 22:30 local time via Open-Meteo / CAMS, corrected with 4 ground-station cities within 225 km, US EPA index. Values in µg/m³.
Estimate · model corrected with 4 station cities within 139.8 mi (225 km), e.g. Baoshan and Baoshan
Health signal
Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.
PM2.5
19.9
PM10
7.1
NO₂
7.9
O₃
23.0
SO₂
2.7
CO
332.0
- Outdoor exercise
- Fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier
- Windows
- Fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution
- Mask
- Not needed for most people
- Air purifier
- Worth running if you are sensitive
Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Mu-se's daily AQI at 47 on average, from 12 on Nov 10 to an hourly peak of 98 on Nov 5.
Where Mu-se stands: the most polluted cities in the world right now · the cleanest
Tree cover detail
Tree cover in Mu-se: Below target
18.2% tree cover against a 30% healthy-neighborhood target, across 4.7 sq mi (12.22 km²) of land.
Trees in this area
55,576
Target trees
91,609
More trees needed
36,033
CO₂ if planted / yr
792.7 t
Deforestation · 2001–2025
How much forest has Mu-se lost?
Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Mu-se has lost about 3,150 hectares of forest (about 4,400 football pitches): 29% of the forest it had in 2000. The biggest cause was shifting farming (33%), after which forest can grow back. About 1,250 hectares (40%) was deforestation: forest cleared for good for farms, mines or towns.

2017: satellite photo from February 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 6 km southeast of the city center.
- Forest lost since 2001
- 3,150 haabout 4,400 football pitches
- Share of its forest
- 29%of what there was in 2000
- Cleared for good
- 1,250 hadeforestation: turned into farms, mines or towns
Forest loss has stayed about the same: about 110 hectares a year in 2021–2025, against 124 hectares a year in 2016–2020. The worst year was 2012, when about 356 hectares of forest were lost.
Hectares of forest lost each year
Show the figures as a table
| Year | Cleared for good | Can grow back | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 3 ha | 6 ha | 9 ha |
| 2002 | 8 ha | 26 ha | 34 ha |
| 2003 | 21 ha | 16 ha | 37 ha |
| 2004 | 16 ha | 22 ha | 38 ha |
| 2005 | 28 ha | 34 ha | 61 ha |
| 2006 | 15 ha | 52 ha | 67 ha |
| 2007 | 95 ha | 172 ha | 267 ha |
| 2008 | 23 ha | 30 ha | 52 ha |
| 2009 | 85 ha | 74 ha | 159 ha |
| 2010 | 68 ha | 38 ha | 106 ha |
| 2011 | 78 ha | 129 ha | 207 ha |
| 2012 | 158 ha | 198 ha | 356 ha |
| 2013 | 75 ha | 115 ha | 190 ha |
| 2014 | 114 ha | 175 ha | 289 ha |
| 2015 | 42 ha | 63 ha | 105 ha |
| 2016 | 50 ha | 55 ha | 105 ha |
| 2017 | 40 ha | 82 ha | 121 ha |
| 2018 | 35 ha | 49 ha | 84 ha |
| 2019 | 49 ha | 128 ha | 177 ha |
| 2020 | 38 ha | 94 ha | 132 ha |
| 2021 | 36 ha | 79 ha | 115 ha |
| 2022 | 34 ha | 68 ha | 102 ha |
| 2023 | 46 ha | 89 ha | 135 ha |
| 2024 | 37 ha | 49 ha | 87 ha |
| 2025 | 53 ha | 58 ha | 111 ha |
What is causing deforestation around Mu-se?
- Shifting farmingcan grow back33% · 1,050 ha
- Loggingcan grow back27% · 849 ha
- Farms, pasture and plantationscleared for good21% · 662 ha
Also: towns and roads, mining and energy, unknown causes.
Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.
Forest gained and lost, 2000–2020
- Forest in 2000
- 14,600 ha
- Forest in 2020
- 13,900 ha
- Overall change
- −694 haless forest than in 2000
Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Mu-se shrank from about 14,600 hectares to 13,900 hectares, a net loss of about 694 hectares (−4.8%). New forest grew on about 1,220 hectares, but 1,910 hectares were lost.
These 2000 and 2020 maps, from the University of Maryland, count any land with trees taller than 5 m as forest, including plantations and orchards. Forest that was cut or burned and had grown back by 2020 counts in both years, so the loss here is smaller than the yearly figures.
These figures cover everything within 10 km of the city center, a wider area than the report above, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.
Source: Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA, Global Forest Change (GFC-2025-v1.13); causes: WRI/Google DeepMind drivers of forest loss; both CC BY 4.0, summed by Airleaf for each area. Forest gained and lost 2000–2020: Potapov et al. 2022, UMD GLAD Global Land Cover and Land Use Change, CC BY 4.0. Images: contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data. How it's measured
In the same region
Measured cities near Mu-se
Same 2 km radius, same index — so they compare directly.
- Longling County103.3 km
China
- Tree cover
- 57%
- Air quality
- 69
- Lashio119.0 km
Myanmar
- Tree cover
- 31%
- Air quality
- 13
- Tengyue127.0 km
China
- Tree cover
- 19%
- Air quality
- 93
- Baoshan, Yunnan178.3 km
China
- Tree cover
- 18%
- Air quality
- 17
- Lincang223.3 km
China
- Tree cover
- 15%
- Air quality
- 67
- Lushui224.8 km
China
- Tree cover
- 58%
- Air quality
- 55
Build your own
Compare Mu-se with anywhere
This place
Mu-se
Use this data
Put Mu-se's numbers on your site
Free to embed. Updates itself as the measurement refreshes.
Frequently asked
Questions about Mu-se
What is the air quality (AQI) in Mu-se right now?
The latest reading for Mu-se shows an AQI of 69 (Moderate), observed Nov 10, 22:30 local time via Open-Meteo / CAMS, corrected with 4 ground-station cities within 225 km, US EPA index. The main pollutant is PM2.5. Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.
Is it safe to exercise outside in Mu-se today?
At AQI 69 (Moderate): fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier. Windows: fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution. Masks: not needed for most people. The reading changes through the day, so check again before a long run or ride.
What has the air quality in Mu-se been like this week?
Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Mu-se's daily AQI at 47 on average, from 12 on Nov 10 to an hourly peak of 98 on Nov 5. No day averaged above 100, the level where the air turns unhealthy for sensitive groups.
How much forest has the area around Mu-se lost since 2001?
Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Mu-se has lost about 3,150 hectares of forest (about 4,400 football pitches): 29% of the forest it had in 2000. The biggest cause was shifting farming (33%), after which forest can grow back. About 1,250 hectares (40%) was deforestation: forest cleared for good for farms, mines or towns. Forest loss has stayed about the same: about 110 hectares a year in 2021–2025, against 124 hectares a year in 2016–2020. Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Mu-se shrank from about 14,600 hectares to 13,900 hectares, a net loss of about 694 hectares (−4.8%). New forest grew on about 1,220 hectares, but 1,910 hectares were lost.
What is the tree count in Mu-se?
Mu-se has an estimated 55,576 trees across the 4.7 sq mi (12.22 km²) of land measured — 18.2% tree cover, 12 percentage points short of the 30% tree-cover target set for this area.
How many more trees does Mu-se need?
Mu-se needs roughly 36,033 more trees to close a 12-point shortfall against its 30% tree-cover target — about 792.7 t of extra CO₂ absorbed per year once grown.
How are Mu-se's air quality and tree cover measured?
Air quality comes from ground monitoring stations via OpenAQ where one reports nearby, and otherwise, as here, from the Open-Meteo / CAMS model, which may differ from street-level monitors. Tree cover is measured from Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search satellite imagery at 10 m detail across a 1.2 mi (2 km) radius around Muse; the tree count is an estimate derived from that cover.
See your own area
What does your neighborhood look like?
Pick any point and radius to get the same air-quality and tree-cover breakdown.
Check my address
