Skip to content
Airleaf

City report · KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Ladysmith Air quality today

Air quality in Ladysmith currently reads AQI 41 (Good): Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.

Air quality right now

AQI 41

Good

Main pollutant: PM2.5
PM2.5, fine particles (µg/m³)
6.1
tree cover
29.2%
trees in this area
91.7K
more trees needed
2.5K

Measured across a 2 km radius around uMnambithi, South Africa (12.57 km²), from a satellite image of Sep 24, 2026. Lower AQI is better: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous.

Ladysmith · AQI 41 (Good)

Dark green marks tree cover detected inside the study radius.Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, captured Sep 24, 2026

Ladysmith's tree count comes to 91,735 trees across 12.57 km², 1 points below the 30% tree-cover level considered healthy for this area, so roughly 2,513 more trees would close the gap.

Air quality detail

Air quality in Ladysmith today: AQI 41, Good

Main pollutant: PM2.5 · Observed Nov 11, 08:00 local time via Open-Meteo / CAMS, corrected with 4 ground-station cities within 185 km, US EPA index. Values in µg/m³.

Estimate · model corrected with 4 station cities within 185 km, e.g. Pietermaritzburg and KwaDukuza

Health signal

Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.

PM2.5

6.1

PM10

6.6

NO₂

1.4

O₃

99.0

SO₂

5.4

CO

146.0

Outdoor exercise
A good day to be active outside
Windows
Open them to air the house
Mask
Not needed
Air purifier
Not needed

Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Ladysmith's daily AQI at 37 on average, from 5 on Nov 8 to an hourly peak of 74 on Nov 10.

Last 7 daysavg 37 · peak 74
Nov 5: AQI 50 (peak 67)Nov 6: AQI 45 (peak 58)Nov 7: AQI 37 (peak 55)Nov 8: AQI 5 (peak 14)Nov 9: AQI 26 (peak 56)Nov 10: AQI 48 (peak 74)Nov 11: AQI 48 (peak 53)
Nov 5Nov 11

Where Ladysmith stands: the most polluted cities in the world right now · the cleanest

Tree cover detail

Tree cover in Ladysmith: Below target

29.2% tree cover against a 30% healthy-neighborhood target, across 12.57 km².

1 points below target

Trees in this area

91,735

Target trees

94,248

More trees needed

2,513

CO₂ if planted / yr

55.3 t

Deforestation · 2001–2025

How much forest has Ladysmith lost?

Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Ladysmith has lost about 5 hectares of forest (about 7 football pitches): 2.3% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it (89%) was deforestation, forest cleared for good, mainly for towns and roads.

Satellite image of the area around Ladysmith, July 2017

2017: satellite photo from July 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Forest lost since 2001
5 haabout 7 football pitches
Share of its forest
2.3%of what there was in 2000
Cleared for good
4 hadeforestation: turned into farms, mines or towns

The worst year was 2009, when about 2 hectares of forest were lost.

Forest lost each year around Ladysmith, 2001–2025

Hectares of forest lost each year

Forest lost each year around Ladysmith, 2001–2025. Use the left and right arrow keys to read each year.2.2

Show the figures as a table
Forest lost each year around Ladysmith, 2001–2025
YearCleared for goodCan grow backTotal
2001under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2002under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2003under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2004under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2005under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2006under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2007under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2008under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
20092 haunder 1 ha2 ha
2010under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2011under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2012under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2013under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2014under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2015under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2016under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2017under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2018under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2019under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2020under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2021under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2022under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2023under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2024under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
2025under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha

What is causing deforestation around Ladysmith?

  • Towns and roadscleared for good53% · 3 ha
  • Farms, pasture and plantationscleared for good34% · 2 ha
  • Unknown causescause unknown8.5% · under 1 ha

Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.

Forest gained and lost, 2000–2020

Forest in 2000
1,540 ha
Forest in 2020
1,570 ha
Overall change
+30 hamore forest than in 2000

Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Ladysmith stayed about the same size, at about 1,570 hectares: new forest grew on about 45 hectares, and about 15 hectares were lost.

These 2000 and 2020 maps, from the University of Maryland, count any land with trees taller than 5 m as forest, including plantations and orchards. Forest that was cut or burned and had grown back by 2020 counts in both years, so the loss here is smaller than the yearly figures.

These figures cover everything within 10 km of the city center, a wider area than the report above, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Source: Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA, Global Forest Change (GFC-2025-v1.13); causes: WRI/Google DeepMind drivers of forest loss; both CC BY 4.0, summed by Airleaf for each area. Forest gained and lost 2000–2020: Potapov et al. 2022, UMD GLAD Global Land Cover and Land Use Change, CC BY 4.0. Images: contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data. How it's measured

In the same region

Measured cities near Ladysmith

Same 2 km radius, same index — so they compare directly.

  • Newcastle

    South Africa

    90.3 km
    Tree cover
    13%
    Air quality
    49
  • Pietermaritzburg

    South Africa

    131.9 km
    Tree cover
    36%
    Air quality
    69
  • Vryheid

    South Africa

    132.5 km
    Tree cover
    33%
    Air quality
    13
  • 151.0 km
    Tree cover
    10%
    Air quality
    19
  • Mpumalanga

    South Africa

    162.4 km
    Tree cover
    24%
    Air quality
    117
  • KwaDukuza

    South Africa

    170.1 km
    Tree cover
    44%
    Air quality
    31

Build your own

Compare Ladysmith with anywhere

This place

Ladysmith

Use this data

Put Ladysmith's numbers on your site

Free to embed. Updates itself as the measurement refreshes.

Ladysmith air quality (AQI) and tree cover — measured by Airleaf
HTML
Markdown

Frequently asked

Questions about Ladysmith

What is the air quality (AQI) in Ladysmith right now?

The latest reading for Ladysmith shows an AQI of 41 (Good), observed Nov 11, 08:00 local time via Open-Meteo / CAMS, corrected with 4 ground-station cities within 185 km, US EPA index. The main pollutant is PM2.5. Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.

Is it safe to exercise outside in Ladysmith today?

At AQI 41 (Good): a good day to be active outside. Windows: open them to air the house. Masks: not needed. The reading changes through the day, so check again before a long run or ride.

What has the air quality in Ladysmith been like this week?

Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Ladysmith's daily AQI at 37 on average, from 5 on Nov 8 to an hourly peak of 74 on Nov 10. No day averaged above 100, the level where the air turns unhealthy for sensitive groups.

How much forest has the area around Ladysmith lost since 2001?

Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Ladysmith has lost about 5 hectares of forest (about 7 football pitches): 2.3% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it (89%) was deforestation, forest cleared for good, mainly for towns and roads. Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Ladysmith stayed about the same size, at about 1,570 hectares: new forest grew on about 45 hectares, and about 15 hectares were lost.

What is the tree count in Ladysmith?

Ladysmith has an estimated 91,735 trees across the 12.57 km² measured — 29.2% tree cover, 1 percentage points short of the 30% tree-cover target set for this area.

How many more trees does Ladysmith need?

Ladysmith needs roughly 2,513 more trees to close a 1-point shortfall against its 30% tree-cover target — about 55.3 t of extra CO₂ absorbed per year once grown.

How are Ladysmith's air quality and tree cover measured?

Air quality comes from ground monitoring stations via OpenAQ where one reports nearby, and otherwise, as here, from the Open-Meteo / CAMS model, which may differ from street-level monitors. Tree cover is measured from Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search satellite imagery at 10 m detail across a 2 km radius around uMnambithi; the tree count is an estimate derived from that cover.

See your own area

What does your neighborhood look like?

Pick any point and radius to get the same air-quality and tree-cover breakdown.

Check my address