Skip to content
Airleaf

City report · Kwilu, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Kikwit Air quality today

Air quality in Kikwit currently reads AQI 47 (Good): Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.

AQI 47

Air quality right now

Good

Main pollutant: PM2.5
PM2.5, fine particles (µg/m³)
7.3
tree cover
43.6%
trees in this area
137K
more trees needed
0

Measured across a 2 km radius around Kikwit, Democratic Republic of the Congo (12.57 km²), from a satellite image of Sep 25, 2026. Lower AQI is better: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous.

Dark green marks tree cover detected inside the study radius.Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, captured Sep 25, 2026

Kikwit's tree count comes to 136,699 trees across 12.54 km² of land, already at or above the 30% tree-cover level considered healthy for this area.

Air quality detail

Air quality in Kikwit today: AQI 47, Good

Main pollutant: PM2.5 · Observed Nov 11, 09:00 local time via Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index. Values in µg/m³.

Model estimate · no ground station nearby

Health signal

Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.

PM2.5

7.3

PM10

7.5

NO₂

0.7

O₃

53.0

SO₂

0.4

CO

205.0

Outdoor exercise
A good day to be active outside
Windows
Open them to air the house
Mask
Not needed
Air purifier
Not needed

Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Kikwit's daily AQI at 50 on average, from 45 on Nov 9 to an hourly peak of 87 on Nov 9.

Last 7 daysavg 50 · peak 87
Nov 5: AQI 58 (peak 78)Nov 6: AQI 55 (peak 81)Nov 7: AQI 49 (peak 79)Nov 8: AQI 49 (peak 64)Nov 9: AQI 45 (peak 87)Nov 10: AQI 45 (peak 86)Nov 11: AQI 51 (peak 54)
Nov 5Nov 11

Where Kikwit stands: the most polluted cities in the world right now · the cleanest

Tree cover detail

Tree cover in Kikwit: Healthy tree cover

43.6% tree cover against a 30% healthy-neighborhood target, across 12.54 km² of land.

Target reached

Trees in this area

136,699

Target trees

136,699

More trees needed

0

CO₂ if planted / yr

0 kg

Deforestation · 2001–2025

How much forest has Kikwit lost?

Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Kikwit has lost about 1,980 hectares of forest (about 2,800 football pitches): 10% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it was lost to shifting farming, so much of it can grow back. About 788 hectares (40%) was deforestation: forest cleared for good for farms, mines or towns.

Satellite image of the area around Kikwit, July 2017

2017: satellite photo from July 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 7 km northeast of the city center.

Forest lost since 2001
1,980 haabout 2,800 football pitches
Share of its forest
10%of what there was in 2000
Cleared for good
788 hadeforestation: turned into farms, mines or towns

Forest loss has stayed about the same: about 122 hectares a year in 2021–2025, against 118 hectares a year in 2016–2020. The worst year was 2021, when about 255 hectares of forest were lost.

Forest lost each year around Kikwit, 2001–2025

Hectares of forest lost each year

Forest lost each year around Kikwit, 2001–2025. Use the left and right arrow keys to read each year.255

Show the figures as a table
Forest lost each year around Kikwit, 2001–2025
YearCleared for goodCan grow backTotal
200119 ha12 ha31 ha
20023 ha1 ha5 ha
200346 ha17 ha63 ha
20045 ha2 ha7 ha
200514 ha8 ha23 ha
200630 ha24 ha54 ha
200774 ha30 ha104 ha
2008under 1 haunder 1 haunder 1 ha
20091 ha1 ha2 ha
201062 ha47 ha109 ha
201114 ha12 ha26 ha
201252 ha64 ha116 ha
201336 ha89 ha125 ha
201430 ha52 ha81 ha
201514 ha21 ha36 ha
201628 ha66 ha94 ha
201736 ha114 ha150 ha
201815 ha62 ha77 ha
201948 ha70 ha118 ha
202084 ha67 ha151 ha
202145 ha210 ha255 ha
202225 ha48 ha73 ha
202313 ha27 ha40 ha
202426 ha30 ha56 ha
202568 ha120 ha188 ha

What is causing deforestation around Kikwit?

  • Shifting farmingcan grow back60% · 1,190 ha
  • Farms, pasture and plantationscleared for good25% · 486 ha
  • Towns and roadscleared for good15% · 302 ha

Also: unknown causes.

Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.

Forest gained and lost, 2000–2020

Forest in 2000
6,490 ha
Forest in 2020
6,010 ha
Overall change
−477 haless forest than in 2000

Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Kikwit shrank from about 6,490 hectares to 6,010 hectares, a net loss of about 477 hectares (−7.4%). New forest grew on about 483 hectares, but 960 hectares were lost.

These 2000 and 2020 maps, from the University of Maryland, count any land with trees taller than 5 m as forest, including plantations and orchards. Forest that was cut or burned and had grown back by 2020 counts in both years, so the loss here is smaller than the yearly figures.

These figures cover everything within 10 km of the city center, a wider area than the report above, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Source: Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA, Global Forest Change (GFC-2025-v1.13); causes: WRI/Google DeepMind drivers of forest loss; both CC BY 4.0, summed by Airleaf for each area. Forest gained and lost 2000–2020: Potapov et al. 2022, UMD GLAD Global Land Cover and Land Use Change, CC BY 4.0. Images: contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data. How it's measured

In the same region

Measured cities near Kikwit

Same 2 km radius, same index — so they compare directly.

  • Ilebo

    Democratic Republic of the Congo

    211.5 km
    Tree cover
    34%
    Air quality
    15
  • Bandundu Province

    Democratic Republic of the Congo

    249.2 km
    Tree cover
    28%
    Air quality
    46
  • Tshikapa

    Democratic Republic of the Congo

    267.5 km
    Tree cover
    36%
    Air quality
    34
  • Chitato

    Angola

    338.7 km
    Tree cover
    33%
    Air quality
    37
  • Dundo

    Angola

    340.2 km
    Tree cover
    30%
    Air quality
    51
  • Masina

    Democratic Republic of the Congo

    386.5 km
    Tree cover
    21%
    Air quality
    93

Build your own

Compare Kikwit with anywhere

This place

Kikwit

Use this data

Put Kikwit's numbers on your site

Free to embed. Updates itself as the measurement refreshes.

Kikwit air quality (AQI) and tree cover — measured by Airleaf
HTML
Markdown

Frequently asked

Questions about Kikwit

What is the air quality (AQI) in Kikwit right now?

The latest reading for Kikwit shows an AQI of 47 (Good), observed Nov 11, 09:00 local time via Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index. The main pollutant is PM2.5. Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.

Is it safe to exercise outside in Kikwit today?

At AQI 47 (Good): a good day to be active outside. Windows: open them to air the house. Masks: not needed. The reading changes through the day, so check again before a long run or ride.

What has the air quality in Kikwit been like this week?

Over the last 7 days, the CAMS air-quality model put Kikwit's daily AQI at 50 on average, from 45 on Nov 9 to an hourly peak of 87 on Nov 9. No day averaged above 100, the level where the air turns unhealthy for sensitive groups.

How much forest has the area around Kikwit lost since 2001?

Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Kikwit has lost about 1,980 hectares of forest (about 2,800 football pitches): 10% of the forest it had in 2000. Most of it was lost to shifting farming, so much of it can grow back. About 788 hectares (40%) was deforestation: forest cleared for good for farms, mines or towns. Forest loss has stayed about the same: about 122 hectares a year in 2021–2025, against 118 hectares a year in 2016–2020. Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Kikwit shrank from about 6,490 hectares to 6,010 hectares, a net loss of about 477 hectares (−7.4%). New forest grew on about 483 hectares, but 960 hectares were lost.

What is the tree count in Kikwit?

Kikwit has an estimated 136,699 trees across the 12.54 km² of land measured — 43.6% tree cover, already past the 30% tree-cover target set for this area.

How many more trees does Kikwit need?

Kikwit has already reached its tree-cover target, so no additional trees are needed to close the gap.

How are Kikwit's air quality and tree cover measured?

Air quality comes from ground monitoring stations via OpenAQ where one reports nearby, and otherwise, as here, from the Open-Meteo / CAMS model, which may differ from street-level monitors. Tree cover is measured from Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search satellite imagery at 10 m detail across a 2 km radius around Kikwit; the tree count is an estimate derived from that cover.

See your own area

What does your neighborhood look like?

Pick any point and radius to get the same air-quality and tree-cover breakdown.

Check my address