Deforestation · 10 km around the city · 2001–2025
Deforestation around Wellington
Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Wellington has lost about 689 hectares of forest (about 970 football pitches): 6.6% of the forest it had in 2000. The biggest cause was logging (43%), after which forest can grow back. About 255 hectares (37%) was deforestation: forest cleared for good for farms, mines or towns.
- Forest in 2000
- 10,400 hawithin 10 km of the centre
- Forest lost since 2001
- 689 ha6.6% of it, about 970 football pitches
- Cleared for good
- 255 hadeforestation, 37% of the loss
- Worst year
- 201892 ha lost
Satellite timelapse
2018: satellite photo from March 2018 of a 5 × 5 km area about 6 km north-west of the city centre.
Satellite photos of the same 5 × 5 km area, one per year, all taken in the same season so the colours compare. You can see forest being cleared and towns spreading, though not single trees. Download the before/after image (free to reuse with credit to Airleaf).
Year by year
Forest lost around Wellington, year by year
The worst year was 2018, when about 92 hectares of forest were lost, mostly to wildfires.
Hectares of forest lost each year
Show the figures as a table
| Year | Cleared for good | Can grow back | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 6 ha | 13 ha | 19 ha |
| 2002 | 6 ha | 1 ha | 7 ha |
| 2003 | 10 ha | 2 ha | 12 ha |
| 2004 | 14 ha | 4 ha | 17 ha |
| 2005 | 12 ha | 20 ha | 32 ha |
| 2006 | 7 ha | 62 ha | 69 ha |
| 2007 | 14 ha | 42 ha | 56 ha |
| 2008 | 6 ha | 6 ha | 12 ha |
| 2009 | 7 ha | 28 ha | 35 ha |
| 2010 | 5 ha | 19 ha | 24 ha |
| 2011 | 14 ha | 2 ha | 17 ha |
| 2012 | 4 ha | 2 ha | 6 ha |
| 2013 | 10 ha | 6 ha | 16 ha |
| 2014 | 5 ha | 5 ha | 10 ha |
| 2015 | 9 ha | 2 ha | 11 ha |
| 2016 | 18 ha | 7 ha | 25 ha |
| 2017 | 39 ha | 15 ha | 54 ha |
| 2018 | 26 ha | 66 ha | 92 ha |
| 2019 | 7 ha | 19 ha | 26 ha |
| 2020 | 13 ha | 34 ha | 47 ha |
| 2021 | 4 ha | 23 ha | 27 ha |
| 2022 | 10 ha | 31 ha | 41 ha |
| 2023 | 3 ha | 20 ha | 23 ha |
| 2024 | 2 ha | 6 ha | 7 ha |
| 2025 | 5 ha | 1 ha | 6 ha |
Forest gained and lost, 2000–2020
- Forest in 2000
- 9,390 ha
- Forest in 2020
- 9,430 ha
- Overall change
- +41 hamore forest than in 2000
Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Wellington stayed about the same size, at about 9,430 hectares: new forest grew on about 290 hectares, and about 249 hectares were lost.
These 2000 and 2020 maps, from the University of Maryland, count any land with trees taller than 5 m as forest, including plantations and orchards. Forest that was cut or burned and had grown back by 2020 counts in both years, so the loss here is smaller than the yearly figures.
Causes
What is causing deforestation around Wellington?
- 37%cleared for good (deforestation)
- 61%can grow back (fire, logging, storms)
- 1.8%cause unknown
- Logging43% · 299 ha
Can grow back. Trees cut for timber or paper. The land usually stays forest and grows back.
- Towns and roads17% · 114 ha
Cleared for good. Forest replaced by houses, buildings and roads.
- Wildfires16% · 113 ha
Can grow back. Forest burned. It often grows back, though fire is sometimes used to clear land for good.
- Mining and energy13% · 91 ha
Cleared for good. Forest cleared for mines, oil and gas, power lines and dams.
- Farms, pasture and plantations7.1% · 49 ha
Cleared for good. Forest cleared for crops, cattle pasture or tree plantations: the biggest cause of deforestation in the world.
- Storms, floods and other natural causes1.6% · 11 ha
Can grow back. Trees killed by storms, floods, landslides, pests or disease.
- Unknown causes1.8% · 12 ha
Cause unknown. The satellites saw the trees go, but not why.
Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.
Use this data
Put Wellington's forest loss on your site
Free to embed, with a link back to the full figures.
Frequently asked
Questions about deforestation around Wellington
How much forest has Wellington lost since 2001?
Since 2001, the area within 10 km of Wellington has lost about 689 hectares of forest (about 970 football pitches): 6.6% of the forest it had in 2000. The biggest cause was logging (43%), after which forest can grow back. About 255 hectares (37%) was deforestation: forest cleared for good for farms, mines or towns.
What is causing deforestation around Wellington?
The main causes of forest loss since 2001 are logging (43%), towns and roads (17%), wildfires (16%). About 255 hectares was deforestation, meaning forest cleared for good for farms, mines or towns. Causes for 2025 are estimates, based on what caused forest loss in the same places up to 2024.
What was the worst year for forest loss around Wellington?
The worst year was 2018, when about 92 hectares of forest were lost, mostly to wildfires.
Is the forest around Wellington growing or shrinking?
Comparing satellite maps from 2000 and 2020, the forest around Wellington stayed about the same size, at about 9,430 hectares: new forest grew on about 290 hectares, and about 249 hectares were lost. These 2000 and 2020 maps, from the University of Maryland, count any land with trees taller than 5 m as forest, including plantations and orchards. Forest that was cut or burned and had grown back by 2020 counts in both years, so the loss here is smaller than the yearly figures.
Can I see satellite images of Wellington over the years?
Yes. The timelapse at the top of this page has a satellite photo for every year from 2018 to 2026 of a 5 × 5 km area near Wellington, where the most forest was lost. Press play to watch it change, or turn on "Show cleared forest" to see exactly where trees were lost.
How is forest loss measured?
We use satellite maps from the University of Maryland (Hansen and colleagues) that show, for every 30 × 30 m patch of land on Earth, the year its trees were cut down, burned or died, from 2001 to 2025. We add up those patches within 10 km of the centre of Wellington, counting only places that were at least 30% covered by trees in 2000. The cause of each loss comes from a map made by the World Resources Institute and Google DeepMind. All figures are estimates.