Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Canada, 76 km apart

Kitchener vs London Air quality index (AQI) today

Kitchener has cleaner air than London right now: AQI 55 (Moderate) against 62 (Moderate).

Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. But over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, London averaged AQI 18 against 21, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. London has lost more forest since 2001. Kitchener has more tree cover.

Kitchener

Canada

AQI 55

Moderate

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
11.4 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Ground station
Reading
Nov 11, 11:00 local
London

Canada

AQI 62

Moderate

PM2.5
15 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Ground station
Reading
Nov 11, 10:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Kitchener vs London at a glance

Kitchener is ahead on 4 of 6 measures, and London on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

Kitchener and London compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
KitchenerLondon
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.55 (better)62
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.11.4 (better)15
Past week's averageUS AQI, 6 days.2118 (better)
Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center.58 ha (better)153 ha
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.38.7% (better)31.4%
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.00

Air quality today

What is the air like in Kitchener and London right now?

Kitchener has cleaner air than London right now: AQI 55 (Moderate) against 62 (Moderate). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Both readings come from nearby ground stations.

KitchenerLondon

11.4PM2.5, µg/m³15
3.9Ozone, µg/m³2

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Kitchener: Ground station · Midtown Kitchener, 3.2 km away · median of 5 stations. Data: OpenAQ · AirGradient, AirNow, FarmerAndy, Flaelin, octal.

London: Ground station · London, 2.8 km away. Data: OpenAQ · AirNow.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 6 days?

But over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, London averaged AQI 18 against 21, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Kitchener2London4
Average AQI
Kitchener21London18
Worst day, AQI
Kitchener34London38
KitchenerLondon
50Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10
The daily numbers (6 days)
Daily air quality index for Kitchener and London
DayKitchenerLondon
Nov 52119
Nov 61613
Nov 72515
Nov 83438
Nov 9911
Nov 101814

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Kitchener and London today?

Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. Both are in the same EPA band today (Moderate), so the advice is the same.

Exercise outdoors

Fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier.

Windows

Fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution.

Masks

Not needed for most people.

Air purifier

Worth running if you are sensitive.

Against everywhere else

How do Kitchener and London compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Kitchener's air is cleaner than 54% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and London's is cleaner than 46%. Within Canada, that is 12% and 7% of its 59 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Kitchener
Beats 54%
London
Beats 46%

More tree cover than…

Kitchener
Beats 82%
London
Beats 71%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which has lost more forest, Kitchener or London?

London has lost more: about 153 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 58 ha around Kitchener. 136 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Kitchener
20012025

Worst year: 2017, with 7 ha lost.

London
20012025

Worst year: 2017, with 17 ha lost.

Forest loss around Kitchener and London, 2001 to 2025
KitchenerLondon
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.58 ha (better)153 ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.1.4% (better)3.8%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.36 ha (better)136 ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Too little to callToo little to call
Main known causeTowns and roads (52%)Towns and roads (79%)

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Kitchener

Satellite image of the area around Kitchener, September 2017

2017: satellite photo from September 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

London

Satellite image of the area around London, June 2017

2017: satellite photo from June 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Kitchener or London?

Kitchener has more tree cover: 38.7% of the land within 2 km of its center against 31.4% around London, or about 121,580 trees against 98,646.

Kitchener38.7% of a 30% target
London31.4% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Kitchener and London
KitchenerLondon
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.122K (better)98.6K
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.00
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.2.7M kg (better)2.2M kg

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Kitchener38.7% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 14, 2026
London31.4% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 10, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Kitchener vs London: your questions answered

Is Kitchener cleaner than London?

On air quality, yes, right now: Kitchener reads AQI 55 against 62, a gap of 7 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. But over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, London averaged AQI 18 against 21, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Kitchener and London today?

The advice is the same for both today. Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. Kitchener reads AQI 55 and London reads AQI 62.

Which has lost more forest, Kitchener or London?

London has lost more: about 153 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 58 ha around Kitchener. 136 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Which has more trees, Kitchener or London?

Kitchener has more tree cover: 38.7% of the land within 2 km of its center against 31.4% around London, or about 121,580 trees against 98,646. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Kitchener and London need?

Kitchener needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and London about 0 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Kitchener and London measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings come from nearby ground stations. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Kitchener vs London comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 14, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Kitchener with somewhere else

This place

Kitchener