Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Angola, 340 km apart

Huambo vs Lubango Air quality index (AQI) today

Huambo has cleaner air than Lubango right now: AQI 27 (Good) against 54 (Moderate).

That puts them in different EPA bands, so the health advice differs today. But over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Lubango averaged AQI 47 against 50, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. Huambo has more tree cover.

Huambo

Angola

AQI 27

Good

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
4.4 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 10, 10:00 local
Lubango

Angola

AQI 54

Moderate

PM2.5
10.5 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Ground station
Reading
Nov 11, 19:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Huambo vs Lubango at a glance

Huambo is ahead on 4 of 5 measures, and Lubango on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

Huambo and Lubango compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
HuamboLubango
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.27 (better)54
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.4.4 (better)10.5
Past week's averageUS AQI, 7 days.5047 (better)
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.12.1% (better)6.8%
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.56.2K (better)72.9K

Air quality today

What is the air like in Huambo and Lubango right now?

Huambo has cleaner air than Lubango right now: AQI 27 (Good) against 54 (Moderate). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Lubango is read from a nearby ground station and Huambo is a model estimate, so the two are not quite like for like.

HuamboLubango

4.4PM2.5, µg/m³10.5

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Huambo: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

Lubango: Ground station · Centro Lubango, 600 m away. Data: OpenAQ · AirGradient, Evanilton Pires.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 7 days?

But over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Lubango averaged AQI 47 against 50, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Huambo2Lubango4
Average AQI
Huambo50Lubango47
Worst day, AQI
Huambo66Lubango52
HuamboLubango
50Nov 4Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10
The daily numbers (7 days)
Daily air quality index for Huambo and Lubango
DayHuamboLubango
Nov 45549
Nov 56652
Nov 65151
Nov 73541
Nov 85350
Nov 94445
Nov 104539

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Huambo and Lubango today?

Huambo (AQI 27, Good): Air quality is satisfactory for everyone.

Lubango (AQI 54, Moderate): Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.

Exercise outdoors

Huambo
A good day to be active outside.
Lubango
Fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier.

Windows

Huambo
Open them to air the house.
Lubango
Fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution.

Masks

Huambo
Not needed.
Lubango
Not needed for most people.

Air purifier

Huambo
Not needed.
Lubango
Worth running if you are sensitive.

Against everywhere else

How do Huambo and Lubango compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Huambo's air is cleaner than 83% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Lubango's is cleaner than 55%. Within Angola, that is 100% and 21% of its 35 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Huambo
Beats 83%
Lubango
Beats 55%

More tree cover than…

Huambo
Beats 27%
Lubango
Beats 14%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Huambo

Satellite image of the area around Huambo, August 2017

2017: satellite photo from August 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Lubango

Satellite image of the area around Lubango, August 2017

2017: satellite photo from August 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Huambo or Lubango?

Huambo has more tree cover: 12.1% of the land within 2 km of its center against 6.8% around Lubango, or about 38,013 trees against 21,363.

Huambo12.1% of a 30% target
Lubango6.8% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Huambo and Lubango
HuamboLubango
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.38.0K (better)21.4K
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.56.2K (better)72.9K
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.836K kg (better)470K kg

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Huambo12.1% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Oct 20, 2026
Lubango6.8% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Oct 18, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Huambo vs Lubango: your questions answered

Is Huambo cleaner than Lubango?

On air quality, yes, right now: Huambo reads AQI 27 against 54, a gap of 27 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. But over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Lubango averaged AQI 47 against 50, and it was the cleaner of the two on 4 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Huambo and Lubango today?

In Huambo, at AQI 27: Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. In Lubango, at AQI 54: Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion.

Which has more trees, Huambo or Lubango?

Huambo has more tree cover: 12.1% of the land within 2 km of its center against 6.8% around Lubango, or about 38,013 trees against 21,363. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Huambo and Lubango need?

Huambo needs about 56,235 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Lubango about 72,885 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Huambo and Lubango measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Lubango is read from a nearby ground station and Huambo is a model estimate, so the two are not quite like for like. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Huambo vs Lubango comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Oct 20, 2026 and Oct 18, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Huambo with somewhere else

This place

Huambo