Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Belarus, 247 km apart

Hrodna vs Minsk Air quality index (AQI) today

Minsk has cleaner air than Hrodna right now: AQI 51 (Moderate) against 58 (Moderate).

Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Minsk averaged AQI 36 against 63, and it was the cleaner of the two on 7 of those days. Minsk has lost more forest since 2001. Hrodna has more tree cover.

Hrodna

Belarus

AQI 58

Moderate

PM2.5
13 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 10, 16:00 local
Minsk

Belarus

AQI 51

Moderate

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
9.9 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 10, 16:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Hrodna vs Minsk at a glance

Hrodna and Minsk are level, each ahead on 3 of 6 measures. The better figure in each row is marked.

Hrodna and Minsk compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
HrodnaMinsk
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.5851 (better)
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.139.9 (better)
Past week's averageUS AQI, 7 days.6336 (better)
Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center.292 ha (better)296 ha
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.32.1% (better)26.7%
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.0 (better)10.3K

Air quality today

What is the air like in Hrodna and Minsk right now?

Minsk has cleaner air than Hrodna right now: AQI 51 (Moderate) against 58 (Moderate). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either.

HrodnaMinsk

13PM2.5, µg/m³9.9
19.9PM10, µg/m³12
9.5Nitrogen dioxide, µg/m³9.5
38Ozone, µg/m³53

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Hrodna: Estimate · model corrected with 5 station cities within 250 km, e.g. Białystok and Kaunas. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, corrected with 5 ground-station cities within 250 km, US EPA index.

Minsk: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 7 days?

Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Minsk averaged AQI 36 against 63, and it was the cleaner of the two on 7 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Hrodna0Minsk7
Average AQI
Hrodna63Minsk36
Worst day, AQI
Hrodna86Minsk55
HrodnaMinsk
50Nov 4Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10
The daily numbers (7 days)
Daily air quality index for Hrodna and Minsk
DayHrodnaMinsk
Nov 45829
Nov 55530
Nov 64420
Nov 75631
Nov 87137
Nov 98649
Nov 106855

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Hrodna and Minsk today?

Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. Both are in the same EPA band today (Moderate), so the advice is the same.

Exercise outdoors

Fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier.

Windows

Fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution.

Masks

Not needed for most people.

Air purifier

Worth running if you are sensitive.

Against everywhere else

How do Hrodna and Minsk compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Hrodna's air is cleaner than 50% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Minsk's is cleaner than 61%. Within Belarus, that is 17% and 33% of its 13 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Hrodna
Beats 50%
Minsk
Beats 61%

More tree cover than…

Hrodna
Beats 72%
Minsk
Beats 62%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which has lost more forest, Hrodna or Minsk?

Minsk has lost more: about 296 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 292 ha around Hrodna. 228 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Hrodna
20012025

Worst year: 2007, with 52 ha lost.

Minsk
20012025

Worst year: 2025, with 34 ha lost.

Forest loss around Hrodna and Minsk, 2001 to 2025
HrodnaMinsk
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.292 ha (better)296 ha
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.4% (better)6%
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.146 ha (better)228 ha
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Too little to callToo little to call
Main known causeTowns and roads (48%)Towns and roads (77%)

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Hrodna

Satellite image of the area around Hrodna, August 2017

2017: satellite photo from August 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 7 km north of the city center.

Minsk

Satellite image of the area around Minsk, September 2017

2017: satellite photo from September 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 7 km northeast of the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Hrodna or Minsk?

Hrodna has more tree cover: 32.1% of the land within 2 km of its center against 26.7% around Minsk, or about 99,736 trees against 83,209.

Hrodna32.1% of a 30% target
Minsk26.7% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Hrodna and Minsk
HrodnaMinsk
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.99.7K (better)83.2K
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.0 (better)10.3K
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.2.2M kg (better)1.8M kg

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Hrodna32.1% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Aug 31, 2026
Minsk26.7% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 9, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Hrodna vs Minsk: your questions answered

Is Minsk cleaner than Hrodna?

On air quality, yes, right now: Minsk reads AQI 51 against 58, a gap of 7 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Minsk averaged AQI 36 against 63, and it was the cleaner of the two on 7 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Hrodna and Minsk today?

The advice is the same for both today. Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. Hrodna reads AQI 58 and Minsk reads AQI 51.

Which has lost more forest, Hrodna or Minsk?

Minsk has lost more: about 296 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 292 ha around Hrodna. 228 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Which has more trees, Hrodna or Minsk?

Hrodna has more tree cover: 32.1% of the land within 2 km of its center against 26.7% around Minsk, or about 99,736 trees against 83,209. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Hrodna and Minsk need?

Hrodna needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Minsk about 10,284 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Hrodna and Minsk measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Hrodna vs Minsk comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 9, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Hrodna with somewhere else

This place

Hrodna