Air quality comparison · Sudan, 183 km apart
El Fasher vs Nyala Air quality index (AQI) today
El Fasher has cleaner air than Nyala right now: AQI 61 (Moderate) against 80 (Moderate).
Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, El Fasher averaged AQI 71 against 85, and it was the cleaner of the two on 5 of those days. Nyala has more tree cover.
Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.
El Fasher61Nyala80
Head to head
El Fasher vs Nyala at a glance
El Fasher is ahead on 3 of 5 measures, and Nyala on 2. The better figure in each row is marked.
| El Fasher | Nyala | |
|---|---|---|
| Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better. | 61 (better) | 80 |
| PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³. | 15 (better) | 22.6 |
| Past week's averageUS AQI, 6 days. | 71 (better) | 85 |
| Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center. | 1.9% | 7.4% (better) |
| Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy. | 88.3K | 71.0K (better) |
Air quality today
What is the air like in El Fasher and Nyala right now?
El Fasher has cleaner air than Nyala right now: AQI 61 (Moderate) against 80 (Moderate). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.
Nyala's PM2.5 is about 1.5× the WHO's 24-hour guideline of 15 µg/m³.
Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either.
El FasherNyala
Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).
El Fasher: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.
Nyala: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.
The past week
Which had cleaner air over the past 6 days?
Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, El Fasher averaged AQI 71 against 85, and it was the cleaner of the two on 5 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.
- Cleaner days
- El Fasher5Nyala0
- Average AQI
- El Fasher71Nyala85
- Worst day, AQI
- El Fasher79Nyala100
The daily numbers (6 days)
| Day | El Fasher | Nyala |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | 66 | 74 |
| Nov 6 | 73 | 73 |
| Nov 7 | 79 | 100 |
| Nov 8 | 71 | 95 |
| Nov 9 | 68 | 90 |
| Nov 10 | 70 | 76 |
Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.
What it means today
Is it safe to go outside in El Fasher and Nyala today?
Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. Both are in the same EPA band today (Moderate), so the advice is the same.
Exercise outdoors
Fine for most people; unusually sensitive people should take long or hard exercise easier.
Windows
Fine to open; close them if you are sensitive to pollution.
Masks
Not needed for most people.
Air purifier
Worth running if you are sensitive.
Against everywhere else
How do El Fasher and Nyala compare with the rest of the world?
Right now El Fasher's air is cleaner than 47% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Nyala's is cleaner than 31%. Within Sudan, that is 85% and 50% of its 21 measured places.
Cleaner air than…
- El Fasher
- Beats 47%
- Nyala
- Beats 31%
More tree cover than…
- El Fasher
- Beats 4%
- Nyala
- Beats 15%
Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.
Satellite timelapses
Watch both change, year by year
A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.
El Fasher
2017: satellite photo from February 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.
Nyala
2017: satellite photo from January 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.
Trees
Which has more trees, El Fasher or Nyala?
Nyala has more tree cover: 7.4% of the land within 2 km of its center against 1.9% around El Fasher, or about 23,248 trees against 5,969.
The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.
| El Fasher | Nyala | |
|---|---|---|
| Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area. | 6.0K | 23.2K (better) |
| Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better. | 88.3K | 71.0K (better) |
| CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing. | 131K kg | 511K kg (better) |
Tree cover on the satellite image
The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.
Reading these numbers
How this comparison is made
Air quality index
The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.
Trees and forest
Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.
More on the method on the About Airleaf page.
Frequently asked
El Fasher vs Nyala: your questions answered
Is El Fasher cleaner than Nyala?
On air quality, yes, right now: El Fasher reads AQI 61 against 80, a gap of 19 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 6 days, on modeled daily averages, El Fasher averaged AQI 71 against 85, and it was the cleaner of the two on 5 of those days.
Is it safe to exercise outdoors in El Fasher and Nyala today?
The advice is the same for both today. Unusually sensitive people should consider limiting long outdoor exertion. El Fasher reads AQI 61 and Nyala reads AQI 80.
Which has more trees, El Fasher or Nyala?
Nyala has more tree cover: 7.4% of the land within 2 km of its center against 1.9% around El Fasher, or about 23,248 trees against 5,969. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.
How many more trees do El Fasher and Nyala need?
El Fasher needs about 88,279 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Nyala about 71,000 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.
Are El Fasher and Nyala measured the same way?
The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.
How often does the El Fasher vs Nyala comparison update?
The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 19, 2026 and Sep 7, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.
Keep going
Compare them with somewhere else
Build your own
Compare El Fasher with somewhere else
This place
El Fasher