Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Ecuador, 126 km apart

Cuenca vs Guayaquil Air quality index (AQI) today

Guayaquil has cleaner air than Cuenca right now: AQI 16 (Good) against 24 (Good).

Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, both averaged AQI 30. Cuenca has lost more forest since 2001. Guayaquil has more tree cover.

Cuenca

Ecuador

AQI 24

Good

PM2.5
4.1 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 10, 13:00 local
Guayaquil

Ecuador

AQI 16

Good

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
3.3 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 10, 10:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Cuenca vs Guayaquil at a glance

Guayaquil is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Cuenca on 0. The better figure in each row is marked.

Cuenca and Guayaquil compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
CuencaGuayaquil
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.2416 (better)
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.4.13.3 (better)
Past week's averageUS AQI, 7 days.3030
Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center.625 ha30 ha (better)
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.4.8%6.6% (better)
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.79.2K52.0K (better)

Air quality today

What is the air like in Cuenca and Guayaquil right now?

Guayaquil has cleaner air than Cuenca right now: AQI 16 (Good) against 24 (Good). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either.

CuencaGuayaquil

4.1PM2.5, µg/m³3.3
4.2PM10, µg/m³3.9
0.8Nitrogen dioxide, µg/m³9
66Ozone, µg/m³51

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Cuenca: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

Guayaquil: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 7 days?

Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, both averaged AQI 30. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Cuenca3Guayaquil3
Average AQI
Cuenca30Guayaquil30
Worst day, AQI
Cuenca36Guayaquil41
CuencaGuayaquil
50Nov 4Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10
The daily numbers (7 days)
Daily air quality index for Cuenca and Guayaquil
DayCuencaGuayaquil
Nov 43229
Nov 53419
Nov 62640
Nov 72225
Nov 83641
Nov 93024
Nov 102929

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Cuenca and Guayaquil today?

Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Both are in the same EPA band today (Good), so the advice is the same.

Exercise outdoors

A good day to be active outside.

Windows

Open them to air the house.

Masks

Not needed.

Air purifier

Not needed.

Against everywhere else

How do Cuenca and Guayaquil compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Cuenca's air is cleaner than 85% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Guayaquil's is cleaner than 92%. Within Ecuador, that is 27% and 73% of its 16 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Cuenca
Beats 85%
Guayaquil
Beats 92%

More tree cover than…

Cuenca
Beats 10%
Guayaquil
Beats 13%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which has lost more forest, Cuenca or Guayaquil?

Cuenca has lost more: about 625 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 30 ha around Guayaquil. 448 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Cuenca
20012025

Worst year: 2009, with 109 ha lost.

Guayaquil
20012025

Worst year: 2005, with 8 ha lost.

Forest loss around Cuenca and Guayaquil, 2001 to 2025
CuencaGuayaquil
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.625 ha30 ha (better)
Share of its forestOf what it had in 2000.7.9%under 1% (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.448 ha21 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Too little to callToo little to call
Main known causeFarms, pasture and plantations (43%)Towns and roads (60%)

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Cuenca

Satellite image of the area around Cuenca, November 2017

2017: satellite photo from November 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area about 7 km northwest of the city center.

Guayaquil

Satellite image of the area around Guayaquil, April 2017

2017: satellite photo from April 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Cuenca or Guayaquil?

Guayaquil has more tree cover: 6.6% of the land within 2 km of its center against 4.8% around Cuenca, or about 14,680 trees against 15,080.

Cuenca4.8% of a 30% target
Guayaquil6.6% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Cuenca and Guayaquil
CuencaGuayaquil
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.15.1K (better)14.7K
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.79.2K52.0K (better)
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.332K kg (better)323K kg

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Cuenca4.8% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Oct 7, 2026
Guayaquil6.6% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Jan 5, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Cuenca vs Guayaquil: your questions answered

Is Guayaquil cleaner than Cuenca?

On air quality, yes, right now: Guayaquil reads AQI 16 against 24, a gap of 8 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, both averaged AQI 30.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Cuenca and Guayaquil today?

The advice is the same for both today. Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Cuenca reads AQI 24 and Guayaquil reads AQI 16.

Which has lost more forest, Cuenca or Guayaquil?

Cuenca has lost more: about 625 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against 30 ha around Guayaquil. 448 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Which has more trees, Cuenca or Guayaquil?

Guayaquil has more tree cover: 6.6% of the land within 2 km of its center against 4.8% around Cuenca, or about 14,680 trees against 15,080. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Cuenca and Guayaquil need?

Cuenca needs about 79,168 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Guayaquil about 52,047 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Cuenca and Guayaquil measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Cuenca vs Guayaquil comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Oct 7, 2026 and Jan 5, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Cuenca with somewhere else

This place

Cuenca