Skip to content
Airleaf

Centurion vs Hammanskraal

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Centurion has more tree cover — 24.4% against 11.4%.

Hammanskraal has cleaner air right now — AQI 50 against 101.

Tree cover gap
13.0 points
Centurion is ahead.
Air quality gap
51 AQI
Hammanskraal is cleaner.
Trees between them
40.8K
Centurion has more standing.
Centurion

South Africa

Hammanskraal

South Africa

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

24.4%

11.4%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

101 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups

50 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

76.6K

35.8K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

33.3K

58.4K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

1.7M kg

787K kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Centurion is read from nearby ground stations and Hammanskraal is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

35.5 µg/m³

12 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

CenturionHammanskraal· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
06312522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Centurion and Hammanskraal
DayCenturionHammanskraal
22 Sept9149
23 Sept6967
24 Sept8574
25 Sept10375
26 Sept7463
27 Sept7255
28 Sept6663

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Centurion leads here at 24.4%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Centurion reads 101 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Hammanskraal reads 50 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Centurion and Hammanskraal, answered

Which has more trees, Centurion or Hammanskraal?

Centurion, with roughly 76,578 trees inside its 2 km radius against 35,778. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Centurion has the denser canopy at 24.4%.

Which has better air quality, Centurion or Hammanskraal?

Hammanskraal right now, at AQI 50 against 101 — a gap of 51 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Centurion needs about 33,268 more to reach its canopy target, and Hammanskraal about 58,375. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Centurion with somewhere else

This place

Centurion

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.