Skip to content
Airleaf

Air quality comparison · Kyrgyzstan, 252 km apart

Bishkek vs Manas Air quality index (AQI) today

Bishkek has cleaner air than Manas right now: AQI 6 (Good) against 13 (Good).

Both sit in the same EPA band, so the health advice is the same for each today. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Bishkek averaged AQI 51 against 73, and it was the cleaner of the two on 7 of those days. Bishkek has lost more forest since 2001. Bishkek has more tree cover.

Bishkek

Kyrgyzstan

AQI 6

Good

Cleaner right now

PM2.5
0.8 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 11, 06:00 local
Manas

Kyrgyzstan

AQI 13

Good

PM2.5
2.7 µg/m³
Main pollutant
PM2.5
Source
Model estimate
Reading
Nov 11, 16:00 local

Updated . Lower is better on the US EPA index: 0–50 is Good, above 300 is Hazardous. Measured by Airleaf.

Head to head

Bishkek vs Manas at a glance

Bishkek is ahead on 5 of 6 measures, and Manas on 1. The better figure in each row is marked.

Bishkek and Manas compared on air quality, forest loss and tree cover
BishkekManas
Air quality nowUS AQI. Lower is better.6 (better)13
PM2.5Fine particles, µg/m³.0.8 (better)2.7
Past week's averageUS AQI, 7 days.51 (better)73
Forest lost since 2001Within 10 km of the center.11 haunder 1 ha (better)
Tree coverWithin 2 km of the center.21.6% (better)7.2%
Trees still neededTo reach a healthy canopy.26.4K (better)71.6K

Air quality today

What is the air like in Bishkek and Manas right now?

Bishkek has cleaner air than Manas right now: AQI 6 (Good) against 13 (Good). PM2.5 is setting the index in both.

Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either.

BishkekManas

0.8PM2.5, µg/m³2.7
0.8PM10, µg/m³3.2
1.6Nitrogen dioxide, µg/m³2.9
59Ozone, µg/m³68

Concentrations at the same moment as the index above, for the pollutants both places report. Lower is better. The dark marks on the PM2.5 and PM10 rows show the WHO's 24-hour guidelines (15 and 45 µg/m³).

Bishkek: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

Manas: Model estimate · no ground station nearby. Data: Open-Meteo / CAMS, US EPA index.

The past week

Which had cleaner air over the past 7 days?

Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Bishkek averaged AQI 51 against 73, and it was the cleaner of the two on 7 of those days. A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon; the week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Cleaner days
Bishkek7Manas0
Average AQI
Bishkek51Manas73
Worst day, AQI
Bishkek69Manas112
BishkekManas
50100Nov 5Nov 6Nov 7Nov 8Nov 9Nov 10Nov 11
The daily numbers (7 days)
Daily air quality index for Bishkek and Manas
DayBishkekManas
Nov 553112
Nov 64471
Nov 75769
Nov 85263
Nov 95971
Nov 106988
Nov 112540

Daily averages from the CAMS atmospheric model for both places, so the week compares like with like. They can differ from today's reading at the top of the page wherever that comes from a ground station.

What it means today

Is it safe to go outside in Bishkek and Manas today?

Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Both are in the same EPA band today (Good), so the advice is the same.

Exercise outdoors

A good day to be active outside.

Windows

Open them to air the house.

Masks

Not needed.

Air purifier

Not needed.

Against everywhere else

How do Bishkek and Manas compare with the rest of the world?

Right now Bishkek's air is cleaner than 98% of the 5,420 places Airleaf tracks, and Manas's is cleaner than 94%. Within Kyrgyzstan, that is 100% and 25% of its 5 measured places.

Cleaner air than…

Bishkek
Beats 98%
Manas
Beats 94%

More tree cover than…

Bishkek
Beats 50%
Manas
Beats 15%

Includes model estimates as well as station readings, so it can differ from our most polluted and cleanest air rankings, which use station readings only.

Deforestation · 2001–2025

Which has lost more forest, Bishkek or Manas?

Bishkek has lost more: about 11 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against under 1 ha around Manas. 4 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Measured within 10 km of each center, from the yearly satellite maps of forest loss: a wider circle than the one for tree cover, because forest is usually lost at a city's edges.

Bishkek
20012025

Worst year: 2002, with 2 ha lost.

Manas
20012025

Worst year: 2001, with under 1 ha lost.

Forest loss around Bishkek and Manas, 2001 to 2025
BishkekManas
Forest lost since 2001Cleared, burned or logged.11 haunder 1 ha (better)
Cleared for goodTurned into farms, mines or towns.4 haunder 1 ha (better)
Recent trend2021–2025 against the five years before.Too little to callToo little to call
Main known causeTowns and roads (30%)Farms, pasture and plantations (50%)

Satellite timelapses

Watch both change, year by year

A clear satellite photo a year of the land around each city. Press play, turn on the forest cleared since the first year, or drag the before and after.

Bishkek

Satellite image of the area around Bishkek, August 2017

2017: satellite photo from August 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Manas

Satellite image of the area around Manas, June 2017

2017: satellite photo from June 2017 of a 5 × 5 km area in the city center.

Trees

Which has more trees, Bishkek or Manas?

Bishkek has more tree cover: 21.6% of the land within 2 km of its center against 7.2% around Manas, or about 67,858 trees against 22,619.

Bishkek21.6% of a 30% target
Manas7.2% of a 30% target

The dark mark is each place's canopy target: 30% of the land, raised where air quality is poor.

Tree figures for Bishkek and Manas
BishkekManas
Trees standingEstimated from the canopy area.67.9K (better)22.6K
Trees still neededTo reach the target. Fewer is better.26.4K (better)71.6K
CO₂ absorbed each yearBy the trees already standing.1.5M kg (better)498K kg

Tree cover on the satellite image

The same 2 km radius around each center, with the tree cover the satellite found marked on it.

Bishkek21.6% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 19, 2026
Manas7.2% tree cover · Sentinel-2 L2A (ESA Copernicus) via Earth Search, Sep 19, 2026

Reading these numbers

How this comparison is made

Air quality index

The US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations: ground stations where a place has them nearby, and the CAMS atmospheric model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so it is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place. The guideline marks are from the WHO's 2021 air quality guidelines.

Trees and forest

Tree cover is the share of ground under canopy within 2 km of each center, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It measures that circle, not the whole municipality, which is what makes the two comparable. Forest loss comes from the University of Maryland's Global Forest Change maps.

More on the method on the About Airleaf page.

Frequently asked

Bishkek vs Manas: your questions answered

Is Bishkek cleaner than Manas?

On air quality, yes, right now: Bishkek reads AQI 6 against 13, a gap of 7 points on the US EPA index. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day. Over the past 7 days, on modeled daily averages, Bishkek averaged AQI 51 against 73, and it was the cleaner of the two on 7 of those days.

Is it safe to exercise outdoors in Bishkek and Manas today?

The advice is the same for both today. Air quality is satisfactory for everyone. Bishkek reads AQI 6 and Manas reads AQI 13.

Which has lost more forest, Bishkek or Manas?

Bishkek has lost more: about 11 ha of forest within 10 km of its center from 2001 to 2025, against under 1 ha around Manas. 4 ha of that was cleared for good, for farms, mines or towns.

Which has more trees, Bishkek or Manas?

Bishkek has more tree cover: 21.6% of the land within 2 km of its center against 7.2% around Manas, or about 67,858 trees against 22,619. Both figures describe the same-sized circle of ground around each center, not the whole municipality.

How many more trees do Bishkek and Manas need?

Bishkek needs about 26,389 more to reach its canopy target of 30%, and Manas about 71,628 to reach 30%. The target starts at 30% of the land and rises where air quality is poor.

Are Bishkek and Manas measured the same way?

The method is the same: the US EPA index for air, and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail over an identical radius for trees. Both readings are model estimates, with no ground station close enough to either. Nothing is adjusted for population, city limits or climate.

How often does the Bishkek vs Manas comparison update?

The air readings refresh about once an hour, and each reading's local time is shown at the top of the page. Tree cover comes from the latest clear satellite image of each area (Sep 19, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026), and the forest figures are published yearly.

Keep going

Build your own

Compare Bishkek with somewhere else

This place

Bishkek