Skip to content
Airleaf

Punta Cana vs San Francisco de Macorís

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Punta Cana has more tree cover — 55.1% against 30.4%.

Punta Cana has cleaner air right now — AQI 35 against 76.

Tree cover gap
24.7 points
Punta Cana is ahead.
Air quality gap
41 AQI
Punta Cana is cleaner.
Trees between them
77.6K
Punta Cana has more standing.
Punta Cana

Dominican Republic

San Francisco de Macorís

Dominican Republic

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

55.1%

30.4%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

35 · Good

76 · Moderate

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

173K

95.5K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

0

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

3.8M kg

2.1M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

8.4 µg/m³

23.9 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

13.7 µg/m³

27.7 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

1 µg/m³

24.3 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

44 µg/m³

13 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Punta CanaSan Francisco de Macorís· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387521 Sept24 Sept27 Sept
Daily air quality index for Punta Cana and San Francisco de Macorís
DayPunta CanaSan Francisco de Macorís
21 Sept2142
22 Sept2444
23 Sept2243
24 Sept2144
25 Sept3244
26 Sept6554
27 Sept5066

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Punta Cana leads here at 55.1%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Punta Cana reads 35 (good) and San Francisco de Macorís reads 76 (moderate) right now.

Frequently asked

Punta Cana and San Francisco de Macorís, answered

Which has more trees, Punta Cana or San Francisco de Macorís?

Punta Cana, with roughly 173,102 trees inside its 2 km radius against 95,504. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Punta Cana has the denser canopy at 55.1%.

Which has better air quality, Punta Cana or San Francisco de Macorís?

Punta Cana right now, at AQI 35 against 76 — a gap of 41 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Punta Cana needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and San Francisco de Macorís about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Punta Cana with somewhere else

This place

Punta Cana

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.