Punta Cana vs San Pedro de Macorís
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Punta Cana has more tree cover — 55.1% against 22.2%.
Punta Cana has cleaner air right now — AQI 35 against 38.
- Tree cover gap
- 32.9 points
- Punta Cana is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 3 AQI
- Punta Cana is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 114K
- Punta Cana has more standing.
Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
55.1%
22.2%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
35 · Good
38 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
173K
59.3K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
20.8K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
3.8M kg
1.3M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
8.4 µg/m³
9.1 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
13.7 µg/m³
12.8 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
1 µg/m³
7.4 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
44 µg/m³
23 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Punta Cana | San Pedro de Macorís |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Sept | 21 | 24 |
| 22 Sept | 24 | 30 |
| 23 Sept | 22 | 26 |
| 24 Sept | 21 | 22 |
| 25 Sept | 32 | 31 |
| 26 Sept | 65 | 58 |
| 27 Sept | 50 | 52 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Punta Cana leads here at 55.1%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Punta Cana reads 35 (good) and San Pedro de Macorís reads 38 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Punta Cana and San Pedro de Macorís, answered
Which has more trees, Punta Cana or San Pedro de Macorís?
Punta Cana, with roughly 173,102 trees inside its 2 km radius against 59,282. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Punta Cana has the denser canopy at 55.1%.
Which has better air quality, Punta Cana or San Pedro de Macorís?
Punta Cana right now, at AQI 35 against 38 — a gap of 3 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Punta Cana needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and San Pedro de Macorís about 20,829. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
Build your own
Compare Punta Cana with somewhere else
This place
Punta Cana
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.