Kaunas vs Kohtla-Järve
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Kohtla-Järve has more tree cover — 71.7% against 49.2%.
Kohtla-Järve has cleaner air right now — AQI 20 against 62.
- Tree cover gap
- 22.5 points
- Kohtla-Järve is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 42 AQI
- Kohtla-Järve is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 79.2K
- Kohtla-Järve has more standing.
Lithuania
Estonia
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
49.2%
71.7%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
62 · Moderate
20 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
146K
225K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
0
0
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
3.2M kg
5.0M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Kaunas is read from nearby ground stations and Kohtla-Järve is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
17.5 µg/m³
2.3 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Kohtla-Järve leads here at 71.7%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Kaunas reads 62 (moderate) and Kohtla-Järve reads 20 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Kaunas and Kohtla-Järve, answered
Which has more trees, Kaunas or Kohtla-Järve?
Kohtla-Järve, with roughly 225,252 trees inside its 2 km radius against 146,065. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Kohtla-Järve has the denser canopy at 71.7%.
Which has better air quality, Kaunas or Kohtla-Järve?
Kohtla-Järve right now, at AQI 20 against 62 — a gap of 42 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Kaunas needs about 0 more to reach its canopy target, and Kohtla-Järve about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
Build your own
Compare Kaunas with somewhere else
This place
Kaunas
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.