Charsadda vs Kabul
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Charsadda has more tree cover — 30.0% against 8.3%.
Kabul has cleaner air right now — AQI 36 against 109.
- Tree cover gap
- 21.7 points
- Charsadda is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 73 AQI
- Kabul is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 68.2K
- Charsadda has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
30.0%
8.3%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
109 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups
36 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
94.2K
26.1K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
15.7K
68.2K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
2.1M kg
574K kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Charsadda is read from nearby ground stations and Kabul is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
38.6 µg/m³
5.8 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Charsadda | Kabul |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 141 | 58 |
| 23 Sept | 139 | 53 |
| 24 Sept | 136 | 58 |
| 25 Sept | 127 | 62 |
| 26 Sept | 112 | 51 |
| 27 Sept | 78 | 51 |
| 28 Sept | 89 | 37 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Charsadda leads here at 30.0%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Charsadda reads 109 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Kabul reads 36 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Charsadda and Kabul, answered
Which has more trees, Charsadda or Kabul?
Charsadda, with roughly 94,248 trees inside its 2 km radius against 26,075. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Charsadda has the denser canopy at 30.0%.
Which has better air quality, Charsadda or Kabul?
Kabul right now, at AQI 36 against 109 — a gap of 73 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Charsadda needs about 15,708 more to reach its canopy target, and Kabul about 68,173. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Charsadda vs Shabqadar39% tree cover · AQI 107Compare
- Charsadda vs Peshawar12% tree cover · AQI 102Compare
- Charsadda vs Mardan22% tree cover · AQI 134Compare
- Charsadda vs Tordher40% tree cover · AQI 118Compare
- Charsadda vs Bagrām14% tree cover · AQI 24Compare
- Charsadda vs Gardez13% tree cover · AQI 43Compare
Build your own
Compare Charsadda with somewhere else
This place
Charsadda
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.