Chapecó vs Porto Alegre
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Porto Alegre has more tree cover — 24.4% against 22.2%.
Porto Alegre has cleaner air right now — AQI 23 against 28.
- Tree cover gap
- 2.2 points
- Porto Alegre is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 5 AQI
- Porto Alegre is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 21.8K
- Chapecó has more standing.
Brazil
Brazil
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
22.2%
24.4%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
28 · Good
23 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
69.7K
48.0K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
24.5K
11.0K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
1.5M kg
1.1M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
6.8 µg/m³
2.3 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
7 µg/m³
2.4 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
5 µg/m³
3.7 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
51 µg/m³
49 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Chapecó | Porto Alegre |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 27 | 24 |
| 23 Sept | 33 | 35 |
| 24 Sept | 79 | 59 |
| 25 Sept | 59 | 57 |
| 26 Sept | 60 | 73 |
| 27 Sept | 46 | 28 |
| 28 Sept | 39 | 23 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Porto Alegre leads here at 24.4%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Chapecó reads 28 (good) and Porto Alegre reads 23 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Chapecó and Porto Alegre, answered
Which has more trees, Chapecó or Porto Alegre?
Chapecó, with roughly 69,743 trees inside its 2 km radius against 47,986. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Porto Alegre has the denser canopy at 24.4%.
Which has better air quality, Chapecó or Porto Alegre?
Porto Alegre right now, at AQI 23 against 28 — a gap of 5 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Chapecó needs about 24,504 more to reach its canopy target, and Porto Alegre about 11,013. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Chapecó vs Francisco Beltrão42% tree cover · AQI 29Compare
- Chapecó vs Passo Fundo29% tree cover · AQI 49Compare
- Chapecó vs Guarapuava27% tree cover · AQI 28Compare
- Chapecó vs Lages19% tree cover · AQI 54Compare
- Chapecó vs Canoas27% tree cover · AQI 23Compare
- Chapecó vs Alvorada27% tree cover · AQI 23Compare
Build your own
Compare Chapecó with somewhere else
This place
Chapecó
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.