Chapecó vs Passo Fundo
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Passo Fundo has more tree cover — 29.1% against 22.2%.
Passo Fundo has cleaner air right now — AQI 49 against 54.
- Tree cover gap
- 6.9 points
- Passo Fundo is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 5 AQI
- Passo Fundo is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 21.7K
- Passo Fundo has more standing.
Brazil
Brazil
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
22.2%
29.1%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
54 · Moderate
49 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
69.7K
91.4K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
24.5K
2.8K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
1.5M kg
2.0M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
13.3 µg/m³
11.7 µg/m³
PM10
Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.
13.6 µg/m³
11.7 µg/m³
Nitrogen dioxide
Mostly traffic and combustion.
11.8 µg/m³
4.5 µg/m³
Ozone
Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.
35 µg/m³
61 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Chapecó | Passo Fundo |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 27 | 26 |
| 23 Sept | 33 | 30 |
| 24 Sept | 79 | 58 |
| 25 Sept | 59 | 50 |
| 26 Sept | 60 | 61 |
| 27 Sept | 46 | 38 |
| 28 Sept | 54 | 50 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Passo Fundo leads here at 29.1%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Chapecó reads 54 (moderate) and Passo Fundo reads 49 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Chapecó and Passo Fundo, answered
Which has more trees, Chapecó or Passo Fundo?
Passo Fundo, with roughly 91,420 trees inside its 2 km radius against 69,743. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Passo Fundo has the denser canopy at 29.1%.
Which has better air quality, Chapecó or Passo Fundo?
Passo Fundo right now, at AQI 49 against 54 — a gap of 5 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Chapecó needs about 24,504 more to reach its canopy target, and Passo Fundo about 2,827. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Chapecó vs Francisco Beltrão42% tree cover · AQI 31Compare
- Chapecó vs Guarapuava27% tree cover · AQI 29Compare
- Chapecó vs Lages19% tree cover · AQI 54Compare
- Chapecó vs Bento Gonçalves42% tree cover · AQI 50Compare
- Chapecó vs Caxias do Sul20% tree cover · AQI 51Compare
- Chapecó vs Santa Cruz do Sul49% tree cover · AQI 25Compare
Build your own
Compare Chapecó with somewhere else
This place
Chapecó
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.