Centurion vs Standerton
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Standerton has more tree cover — 29.1% against 24.4%.
Standerton has cleaner air right now — AQI 33 against 101.
- Tree cover gap
- 4.7 points
- Standerton is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 68 AQI
- Standerton is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 14.8K
- Standerton has more standing.
South Africa
South Africa
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
24.4%
29.1%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
101 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups
33 · Good
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
76.6K
91.4K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
33.3K
2.8K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
1.7M kg
2.0M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Centurion is read from nearby ground stations and Standerton is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
35.5 µg/m³
1.6 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Centurion | Standerton |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 91 | 61 |
| 23 Sept | 69 | 75 |
| 24 Sept | 85 | 72 |
| 25 Sept | 103 | 75 |
| 26 Sept | 74 | 76 |
| 27 Sept | 72 | 62 |
| 28 Sept | 66 | 35 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Standerton leads here at 29.1%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Centurion reads 101 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Standerton reads 33 (good) right now.
Frequently asked
Centurion and Standerton, answered
Which has more trees, Centurion or Standerton?
Standerton, with roughly 91,420 trees inside its 2 km radius against 76,578. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Standerton has the denser canopy at 29.1%.
Which has better air quality, Centurion or Standerton?
Standerton right now, at AQI 33 against 101 — a gap of 68 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Centurion needs about 33,268 more to reach its canopy target, and Standerton about 2,827. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Centurion vs Pretoria10% tree cover · AQI 101Compare
- Centurion vs Thembisa5% tree cover · AQI 53Compare
- Centurion vs Randburg40% tree cover · AQI 111Compare
- Centurion vs Benoni15% tree cover · AQI 53Compare
- Centurion vs eMbalenhle24% tree cover · AQI 32Compare
- Centurion vs Ermelo41% tree cover · AQI 34Compare
Build your own
Compare Centurion with somewhere else
This place
Centurion
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.