Skip to content
Airleaf

Bihār Sharīf vs Darbhanga

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Darbhanga has more tree cover — 27.5% against 24.2%.

Bihār Sharīf has cleaner air right now — AQI 100 against 122.

Tree cover gap
3.3 points
Darbhanga is ahead.
Air quality gap
22 AQI
Bihār Sharīf is cleaner.
Trees between them
7.2K
Darbhanga has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

24.2%

27.5%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

100 · Moderate

122 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

75.9K

83.0K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

18.2K

22.6K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

1.7M kg

1.8M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

35.4 µg/m³

44 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

43.1 µg/m³

54.4 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

1.9 µg/m³

2.7 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

138 µg/m³

162 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Bihār SharīfDarbhanga· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
08817522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Bihār Sharīf and Darbhanga
DayBihār SharīfDarbhanga
22 Sept105103
23 Sept4551
24 Sept3541
25 Sept3145
26 Sept4448
27 Sept9683
28 Sept154144

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Darbhanga leads here at 27.5%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Bihār Sharīf reads 100 (moderate) and Darbhanga reads 122 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) right now.

Frequently asked

Bihār Sharīf and Darbhanga, answered

Which has more trees, Bihār Sharīf or Darbhanga?

Darbhanga, with roughly 83,024 trees inside its 2 km radius against 75,874. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Darbhanga has the denser canopy at 27.5%.

Which has better air quality, Bihār Sharīf or Darbhanga?

Bihār Sharīf right now, at AQI 100 against 122 — a gap of 22 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Bihār Sharīf needs about 18,185 more to reach its canopy target, and Darbhanga about 22,643. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Bihār Sharīf with somewhere else

This place

Bihār Sharīf

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.