Belgrade vs Pristina
Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.
Pristina has more tree cover — 18.7% against 18.5%.
Pristina has cleaner air right now — AQI 60 against 88.
- Tree cover gap
- 0.2 points
- Pristina is ahead.
- Air quality gap
- 28 AQI
- Pristina is cleaner.
- Trees between them
- 3.1K
- Pristina has more standing.
Tree cover
Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.
18.5%
18.7%
Air quality index
US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.
88 · Moderate
60 · Moderate
Trees standing
Estimated from the measured canopy area.
55.7K
58.7K
Trees still needed
To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.
34.6K
35.5K
CO₂ absorbed each year
By the trees already standing.
1.2M kg
1.3M kg
Air quality in detail
What each city is breathing
Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are read from nearby ground stations.
PM2.5
Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.
29.9 µg/m³
16.3 µg/m³
The last week, day by day
A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.
| Day | Belgrade | Pristina |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sept | 28 | 31 |
| 23 Sept | 35 | 35 |
| 24 Sept | 48 | 57 |
| 25 Sept | 48 | 48 |
| 26 Sept | 65 | 38 |
| 27 Sept | 61 | 34 |
| 28 Sept | 66 | 48 |
Reading these numbers
What is actually being measured
Tree cover
The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Pristina leads here at 18.7%.
Air quality index
The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Belgrade reads 88 (moderate) and Pristina reads 60 (moderate) right now.
Frequently asked
Belgrade and Pristina, answered
Which has more trees, Belgrade or Pristina?
Pristina, with roughly 58,748 trees inside its 2 km radius against 55,678. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Pristina has the denser canopy at 18.7%.
Which has better air quality, Belgrade or Pristina?
Pristina right now, at AQI 60 against 88 — a gap of 28 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.
How many more trees does each city need?
Belgrade needs about 34,611 more to reach its canopy target, and Pristina about 35,500. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.
Are these two measured the same way?
Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.
Keep going
Other comparisons nearby
- Belgrade vs Novi Sad22% tree cover · AQI 67Compare
- Belgrade vs Kragujevac26% tree cover · AQI 62Compare
- Belgrade vs Čačak30% tree cover · AQI 55Compare
- Belgrade vs Timişoara32% tree cover · AQI 32Compare
- Belgrade vs Ferizaj25% tree cover · AQI 30Compare
- Belgrade vs Mitrovicë26% tree cover · AQI 26Compare
Build your own
Compare Belgrade with somewhere else
This place
Belgrade
Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.