Skip to content
Airleaf

Al Maḩallah al Kubrá vs Damanhur

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Damanhur has more tree cover — 10.6% against 3.0%.

Al Maḩallah al Kubrá has cleaner air right now — AQI 24 against 28.

Tree cover gap
7.6 points
Damanhur is ahead.
Air quality gap
4 AQI
Al Maḩallah al Kubrá is cleaner.
Trees between them
23.9K
Damanhur has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

3.0%

10.6%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

24 · Good

28 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

9.4K

33.3K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

84.8K

60.9K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

207K kg

733K kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

5.8 µg/m³

6.3 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

13.7 µg/m³

10.6 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

6.8 µg/m³

3.4 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

70 µg/m³

101 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Al Maḩallah al KubráDamanhur· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Al Maḩallah al Kubrá and Damanhur
DayAl Maḩallah al KubráDamanhur
22 Sept5757
23 Sept5558
24 Sept4747
25 Sept3737
26 Sept4039
27 Sept5147
28 Sept4637

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Damanhur leads here at 10.6%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Al Maḩallah al Kubrá reads 24 (good) and Damanhur reads 28 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Al Maḩallah al Kubrá and Damanhur, answered

Which has more trees, Al Maḩallah al Kubrá or Damanhur?

Damanhur, with roughly 33,301 trees inside its 2 km radius against 9,425. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Damanhur has the denser canopy at 10.6%.

Which has better air quality, Al Maḩallah al Kubrá or Damanhur?

Al Maḩallah al Kubrá right now, at AQI 24 against 28 — a gap of 4 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Al Maḩallah al Kubrá needs about 84,823 more to reach its canopy target, and Damanhur about 60,947. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Al Maḩallah al Kubrá with somewhere else

This place

Al Maḩallah al Kubrá

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.