Skip to content
Airleaf

Al Maḩallah al Kubrá vs Mīt Ghamr

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Mīt Ghamr has more tree cover — 13.6% against 3.0%.

Al Maḩallah al Kubrá has cleaner air right now — AQI 24 against 25.

Tree cover gap
10.6 points
Mīt Ghamr is ahead.
Air quality gap
1 AQI
Al Maḩallah al Kubrá is cleaner.
Trees between them
29.8K
Mīt Ghamr has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

3.0%

13.6%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

24 · Good

25 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

9.4K

39.2K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

84.8K

47.2K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

207K kg

862K kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

5.8 µg/m³

6 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

13.7 µg/m³

12.4 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

6.8 µg/m³

4.3 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

70 µg/m³

81 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Al Maḩallah al KubráMīt Ghamr· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Al Maḩallah al Kubrá and Mīt Ghamr
DayAl Maḩallah al KubráMīt Ghamr
22 Sept5761
23 Sept5559
24 Sept4753
25 Sept3741
26 Sept4042
27 Sept5154
28 Sept4653

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Mīt Ghamr leads here at 13.6%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Al Maḩallah al Kubrá reads 24 (good) and Mīt Ghamr reads 25 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Al Maḩallah al Kubrá and Mīt Ghamr, answered

Which has more trees, Al Maḩallah al Kubrá or Mīt Ghamr?

Mīt Ghamr, with roughly 39,179 trees inside its 2 km radius against 9,425. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Mīt Ghamr has the denser canopy at 13.6%.

Which has better air quality, Al Maḩallah al Kubrá or Mīt Ghamr?

Al Maḩallah al Kubrá right now, at AQI 24 against 25 — a gap of 1 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Al Maḩallah al Kubrá needs about 84,823 more to reach its canopy target, and Mīt Ghamr about 47,246. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Al Maḩallah al Kubrá with somewhere else

This place

Al Maḩallah al Kubrá

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.