Skip to content
Airleaf

Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān vs Al Khuşūş

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān has more tree cover — 2.6% against 1.0%.

Al Khuşūş has cleaner air right now — AQI 75 against 130.

Tree cover gap
1.6 points
Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān is ahead.
Air quality gap
55 AQI
Al Khuşūş is cleaner.
Trees between them
5.0K
Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

2.6%

1.0%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

130 · Unhealthy for sensitive groups

75 · Moderate

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

8.2K

3.1K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

102K

90.9K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

180K kg

69.0K kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān is read from nearby ground stations and Al Khuşūş is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

47.4 µg/m³

23.6 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Al ‘Āshir min RamaḑānAl Khuşūş· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān and Al Khuşūş
DayAl ‘Āshir min RamaḑānAl Khuşūş
22 Sept5663
23 Sept6168
24 Sept5154
25 Sept4348
26 Sept4749
27 Sept4755
28 Sept6271

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān leads here at 2.6%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān reads 130 (unhealthy for sensitive groups) and Al Khuşūş reads 75 (moderate) right now.

Frequently asked

Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān and Al Khuşūş, answered

Which has more trees, Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān or Al Khuşūş?

Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān, with roughly 8,168 trees inside its 2 km radius against 3,135. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān has the denser canopy at 2.6%.

Which has better air quality, Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān or Al Khuşūş?

Al Khuşūş right now, at AQI 75 against 130 — a gap of 55 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān needs about 101,788 more to reach its canopy target, and Al Khuşūş about 90,924. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān with somewhere else

This place

Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.