Skip to content
Airleaf

Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān vs Al Ḩawāmidīyah

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Al Ḩawāmidīyah has more tree cover — 40.9% against 2.6%.

Al Ḩawāmidīyah has cleaner air right now — AQI 56 against 153.

Tree cover gap
38.3 points
Al Ḩawāmidīyah is ahead.
Air quality gap
97 AQI
Al Ḩawāmidīyah is cleaner.
Trees between them
120K
Al Ḩawāmidīyah has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

2.6%

40.9%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

153 · Unhealthy

56 · Moderate

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

8.2K

128K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

117K

0

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

180K kg

2.8M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān is read from nearby ground stations and Al Ḩawāmidīyah is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

59.4 µg/m³

14.4 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

Al ‘Āshir min RamaḑānAl Ḩawāmidīyah· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān and Al Ḩawāmidīyah
DayAl ‘Āshir min RamaḑānAl Ḩawāmidīyah
22 Sept5666
23 Sept6164
24 Sept5157
25 Sept4356
26 Sept4756
27 Sept4759
28 Sept6364

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Al Ḩawāmidīyah leads here at 40.9%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān reads 153 (unhealthy) and Al Ḩawāmidīyah reads 56 (moderate) right now.

Frequently asked

Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān and Al Ḩawāmidīyah, answered

Which has more trees, Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān or Al Ḩawāmidīyah?

Al Ḩawāmidīyah, with roughly 128,491 trees inside its 2 km radius against 8,168. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Al Ḩawāmidīyah has the denser canopy at 40.9%.

Which has better air quality, Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān or Al Ḩawāmidīyah?

Al Ḩawāmidīyah right now, at AQI 56 against 153 — a gap of 97 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān needs about 117,496 more to reach its canopy target, and Al Ḩawāmidīyah about 0. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān with somewhere else

This place

Al ‘Āshir min Ramaḑān

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.