Skip to content
Airleaf

Accra vs Porto-Novo

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

Porto-Novo has more tree cover — 16.2% against 7.9%.

Porto-Novo has cleaner air right now — AQI 38 against 74.

Tree cover gap
8.3 points
Porto-Novo is ahead.
Air quality gap
36 AQI
Porto-Novo is cleaner.
Trees between them
28.4K
Porto-Novo has more standing.
Accra

Ghana

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

7.9%

16.2%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

74 · Moderate

38 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

22.5K

50.9K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

63.0K

43.4K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

496K kg

1.1M kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Accra is read from nearby ground stations and Porto-Novo is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

23 µg/m³

9.1 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

AccraPorto-Novo· daily US EPA index, last 6 days
0387522 Sept25 Sept27 Sept
Daily air quality index for Accra and Porto-Novo
DayAccraPorto-Novo
22 Sept3141
23 Sept2839
24 Sept4153
25 Sept3852
26 Sept3748
27 Sept3339

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. Porto-Novo leads here at 16.2%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: Accra reads 74 (moderate) and Porto-Novo reads 38 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

Accra and Porto-Novo, answered

Which has more trees, Accra or Porto-Novo?

Porto-Novo, with roughly 50,894 trees inside its 2 km radius against 22,535. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: Porto-Novo has the denser canopy at 16.2%.

Which has better air quality, Accra or Porto-Novo?

Porto-Novo right now, at AQI 38 against 74 — a gap of 36 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

Accra needs about 63,042 more to reach its canopy target, and Porto-Novo about 43,354. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare Accra with somewhere else

This place

Accra

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.