Skip to content
Airleaf

San Salvador de Jujuy vs Sucre

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

San Salvador de Jujuy has more tree cover — 9.4% against 2.1%.

Sucre has cleaner air right now — AQI 28 against 73.

Tree cover gap
7.3 points
San Salvador de Jujuy is ahead.
Air quality gap
45 AQI
Sucre is cleaner.
Trees between them
22.9K
San Salvador de Jujuy has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

9.4%

2.1%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

73 · Moderate

28 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

29.5K

6.6K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

64.7K

87.7K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

650K kg

145K kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. San Salvador de Jujuy is read from nearby ground stations and Sucre is modelled — worth knowing, since the two are not quite like for like.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

22.4 µg/m³

3.9 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

23 µg/m³

4.1 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

San Salvador de JujuySucre· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for San Salvador de Jujuy and Sucre
DaySan Salvador de JujuySucre
22 Sept4028
23 Sept4336
24 Sept4633
25 Sept3732
26 Sept6631
27 Sept7028
28 Sept5329

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. San Salvador de Jujuy leads here at 9.4%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: San Salvador de Jujuy reads 73 (moderate) and Sucre reads 28 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

San Salvador de Jujuy and Sucre, answered

Which has more trees, San Salvador de Jujuy or Sucre?

San Salvador de Jujuy, with roughly 29,531 trees inside its 2 km radius against 6,597. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: San Salvador de Jujuy has the denser canopy at 9.4%.

Which has better air quality, San Salvador de Jujuy or Sucre?

Sucre right now, at AQI 28 against 73 — a gap of 45 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

San Salvador de Jujuy needs about 64,717 more to reach its canopy target, and Sucre about 87,650. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare San Salvador de Jujuy with somewhere else

This place

San Salvador de Jujuy

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.