Skip to content
Airleaf

San Miguel de Tucumán vs Sucre

Tree cover and air quality for both, measured the same way: Sentinel-2 imagery at 10 m detail over a 2 km radius from each city centre, and the live US EPA air quality index. Same radius and same index, so the two numbers compare directly.

San Miguel de Tucumán has more tree cover — 11.7% against 2.1%.

Sucre has cleaner air right now — AQI 24 against 45.

Tree cover gap
9.6 points
San Miguel de Tucumán is ahead.
Air quality gap
21 AQI
Sucre is cleaner.
Trees between them
30.2K
San Miguel de Tucumán has more standing.

Tree cover

Share of the 2 km radius under canopy.

11.7%

2.1%

Air quality index

US EPA index, live, with its band. Lower is better.

45 · Good

24 · Good

Trees standing

Estimated from the measured canopy area.

36.8K

6.6K

Trees still needed

To reach the same canopy target. Fewer is better.

57.5K

87.7K

CO₂ absorbed each year

By the trees already standing.

809K kg

145K kg

Air quality in detail

What each city is breathing

Concentrations in µg/m³, measured at the same moment as the index above. Lower is better in every row. Both are modelled, with no ground station close enough to either.

PM2.5

Fine particles, the pollutant that usually sets the index.

10.7 µg/m³

4.2 µg/m³

PM10

Coarser particles — dust, pollen, road grit.

11 µg/m³

4.5 µg/m³

Nitrogen dioxide

Mostly traffic and combustion.

9.1 µg/m³

7.4 µg/m³

Ozone

Forms in sunlight; peaks on hot, still afternoons.

55 µg/m³

43 µg/m³

The last week, day by day

A single reading can catch a city on a bad afternoon. The week says whether it was the weather or the place.

San Miguel de TucumánSucre· daily US EPA index, last 7 days
0387522 Sept25 Sept28 Sept
Daily air quality index for San Miguel de Tucumán and Sucre
DaySan Miguel de TucumánSucre
22 Sept4228
23 Sept3436
24 Sept4533
25 Sept5732
26 Sept5831
27 Sept6428
28 Sept4827

Reading these numbers

What is actually being measured

Tree cover

The share of ground under canopy inside a 2 km radius of each city centre, read from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at 10 m detail. It is a measurement of that circle, not of the whole municipality — which is exactly what makes the two comparable, since city boundaries are drawn to wildly different rules around the world. San Miguel de Tucumán leads here at 11.7%.

Air quality index

The live US EPA index, computed from current pollutant concentrations — ground stations where a city has them nearby, and a model everywhere else. It moves hour to hour, so this is a snapshot rather than a verdict on either place: San Miguel de Tucumán reads 45 (good) and Sucre reads 24 (good) right now.

Frequently asked

San Miguel de Tucumán and Sucre, answered

Which has more trees, San Miguel de Tucumán or Sucre?

San Miguel de Tucumán, with roughly 36,757 trees inside its 2 km radius against 6,597. Tree cover tells a slightly different story from raw count: San Miguel de Tucumán has the denser canopy at 11.7%.

Which has better air quality, San Miguel de Tucumán or Sucre?

Sucre right now, at AQI 24 against 45 — a gap of 21 points. This is a live reading rather than an annual average, so it can reverse within a day.

How many more trees does each city need?

San Miguel de Tucumán needs about 57,491 more to reach its canopy target, and Sucre about 87,650. The target is the same share of ground for both, so the figures are directly comparable.

Are these two measured the same way?

Yes — that is the point of the page. Identical radius, identical satellite source at 10 m detail, and the same US EPA index for air. Nothing here is adjusted for population, city limits or climate, so the numbers describe the same-sized circle of ground in each place.

Keep going

Other comparisons nearby

Build your own

Compare San Miguel de Tucumán with somewhere else

This place

San Miguel de Tucumán

Want a different pair? Browse comparisons or measure any address.